profile image
Point 6 is essential! Without absolute values, the portfolio hovers in a gray area and cannot be evaluated at all.
4
profile image
@NiMe I clearly disagree. Of course, a portfolio analysis can also be carried out without absolute figures. Then on the basis of weighting. By the way, the total number has nothing to say, except "I show how fat my balls are"... especially with regard to other assets that are not maintained at Getguin or are maintainable, this is absolutely irrelevant... Whether e.g. a strategy is too risky, also shows a pure percentage, anonymized publication. Because on total numbers you can neither say that 1 million is risky or 50€ is risky, if you don't know the other life or income of the person.
1
profile image
@InvestmentPapa but what's the point if not to show how fat my balls are?
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor Like haari.... wait! Uuuuuuulff. 🤢
profile image
@InvestmentPapa Ulf ? Wasn't that @Lorena? Or was that Uwe? 🤔🧐
1
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor That was Uwe. Uwe THE anonymous trucker chick. 😅
1
profile image
@InvestmentPapa thank you, @Lorena is so inactive at the moment. It's no wonder that I forget her real name
2
profile image
@InvestmentPapa 5% per single share is generally ok. But not with e.g. 100€ deposit volume! It is not about comparing eggs but to be realistic. Because not every relative valuation fits to every absolute portfolio.
2
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor I am also a vacationer 😎
2
profile image
@Lorena then forgive my disturbance on vacation. But next time please sign off with official vacation post. Thank you.
1
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor how could such a faux pas happen to me!
1