1Wk·

Why $BTC (-0.05%) cannot be copied and why Bitcoin is fundamentally different from altcoins (870619)


Since the invention of Bitcoin in 2009, there have been countless imitators - from Bitcoin Cash to Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Diamond, Bitcoin SV and many more. But despite all these copies, Bitcoin itself remains the undisputed original and dominates the market capitalization of the entire crypto market.


The questions many may be asking themselves are:

  • Why has no other project yet managed to replace or even seriously threaten Bitcoin?
  • How can it be claimed that Bitcoin is absolutely limited when it could be copied an infinite number of times?


I will try to give you the answer to this question in today's article.


Bitcoin has often been copied, but never replaced

Bitcoin is an open source project - anyone can copy the source code, adapt it and create their own cryptocurrency. And that is exactly what has happened - countless times. The number of Bitcoin forks (spin-offs) is enormous. Especially in 2017, during the crypto boom, numerous "Bitcoin versions" emerged, including


  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Bitcoin Gold
  • Bitcoin Diamond
  • Bitcoin Pizza (yes, this really exists😂)
  • etc.


Nevertheless, these projects never took off. The reason? It is not enough to copy the code of Bitcoin - the essence of Bitcoin lies much deeper - not just in the code.


What makes Bitcoin unique

(1) Decentralization

Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency that is actually completely decentralized. There is no entity, no company and no leading personality that controls Bitcoin. Other projects, even the imitators, often fail because of their dependence on central developers or organizations.


(2) Network effects

Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency and has built up by far the largest ecosystem of users, nodes and miners over the years. New projects have no chance of catching up.


Example: If you want to communicate with a friend, you use a widespread network such as WhatsApp or Telegram. There's no point in developing your own app if nobody uses it. It's the same with Bitcoin - the network effect cannot be copied.


(3) The hashrate as an energy shield

The security of Bitcoin is based on the computing power (hashrate) that protects the network. Bitcoin is the most secure computer network in the world - stronger than any other blockchain project. No altcoin can mobilize nearly as much energy to secure the network against attacks. The more energy flows into the network, the more difficult it becomes to attack Bitcoin.

An attacker alone would have to mobilize more energy than the rest of the world to compromise the network - which is practically impossible.


Physics instead of just computer science: why Bitcoin cannot be copied

A common misconception is that Bitcoin is just a technical project. In reality, its strength lies not only in computer sciencebut also in physics - more precisely in the energy generated by mining.


As a result, Bitcoin has an anchor in the real world, which also ensures that the network continues to decentralize. Energy is only ever available to a limited extent in one place, which is why mining is automatically distributed around the world. Wherever energy is generated that cannot be used in any other way, it can be mined and monetized - a possibility that did not exist before Bitcoin.


As the Proof of Work consensus mechanism is a "winner takes it all" mechanism and other projects cannot compete with Bitcoin in this respect, more and more projects are switching to other consensus mechanisms such as Proof of Stake, which are not physically secured and are therefore only on information technology based only on information technology.

However, these consensus mechanisms are not comparable to Bitcoin in terms of security.


Proof of Stake, for example, rewards those who already own large quantities of coins, which leads to a concentration of assets and a centralized decision-making structure in the long term. An example of this is the concentration of control over validators in Ethereum after the switch to Proof of Stake.


Bitcoin is therefore practically invulnerable and uncopyable thanks to its "energy shield" - in stark contrast to altcoins, which are based purely on IT.


Other cryptocurrencies such as $ETH (+0.2%) for example, are coming under increasing competitive pressure from other, sometimes faster or cheaper coins such as $SOL (+0.39%)

In this case, one non-decentralized project faces competition from another, even less decentralized project.


The altcoins are therefore competing with each other. However, nothing comes close to Bitcoin because none of these other projects can even come close to the security and decentralization of Bitcoin. And security is the most important feature of a monetary network, which is what gives the whole thing trust - and therefore value.


What I simply want to say is:

-> Computer science can be copied, physics cannot.


The "mindblow": Bitcoin can copy, but cannot be copied

Bitcoin has an amazing ability: it can adopt good features of other cryptocurrencies, but cannot be copied itself.


While it is not possible for other projects to copy Bitcoin, as the physical layer cannot be copied, Bitcoin itself can very well adopt properties of other coins that are based purely on information technology based purely on computer science.


Taproot and SegWit show how Bitcoin integrates new technologies. While other coins advertise new functions such as smart contracts or fast payments as a unique selling point, Bitcoin integrates these features via soft forks or 2nd layer technologies such as the Lightning Network while remaining built on its solid foundation.


Bitcoin can therefore adopt future altcoin use cases - if they are found - which makes altcoins virtually obsolete.


Conclusion

Bitcoin is more than just code. It is a unique interplay of technology, energy and global acceptance that no other project can replicate.


There may be many copies, but only one true Bitcoin. And that's not just because of the computer science, but because of the fundamental principles and ecosystem that make Bitcoin a distinctive, uncopyable network.


Have a nice day!✌️🧡

attachment

#bitcoin

67
36 Comments

profile image
6
profile image
Awesome contribution! Thank you🧡
4
profile image
Nice article, but your conclusion has a flaw: global acceptance only exists among Bitcoin fans, but not in real economic life.
As long as states do not introduce Bitcoin as a binding currency, for example, the utility value is only theoretical. But no state will do this, as it is then effectively relinquishing control over its economic sovereignty.
In this respect, Bitcoin remains in my opinion a (admittedly) highly sophisticated IT project - nothing more.
2
Show answer
profile image
Thank you. Here again 21 gq coins that you can redistribute. @Kundenservice that would be a contribution to the best of, wouldn't it?
3
profile image
2
profile image
2
profile image
Good contribution 👍🏼 But where I would at least like to initiate a discussion is your reasoning as to why Proof Of Work is better than Proof Of Stake. You write that Proof of Stake is worse because it has the risk of a centralized decision structure. My problem with these thoughts is that I think there are the same risks with proof of work. The limited energy required to mine bitcoins or validate transactions comes at a high cost, and thus offers the same risk of centralization in my eyes. In particular, if the barrier to entry continues to rise due to the high energy requirements, there will probably be fewer miners in the long term. And those that do exist will have more power in the network. So we have the same correlation between wealth and decision-making power here too. Or am I missing something with this thought?
2
View all 2 further answers
profile image
🍀🫶🏻🙏🏻
2
profile image
Bitcoin is simply not a currency and never will be, while other projects such as $ETH or $SOL can at least theoretically be considered as a currency - a means of payment. A very important point here is the lack of inflation with BTC, or worse deflation due to the possibility of losing coins forever. It is therefore theoretically conceivable that at some point BTC will no longer be accessible. A scenario that is unacceptable for currencies.
BTC may be secure, unique etc. but without any real use (means of payment can be ruled out) the date of death is already fixed.
1
View all 11 further answers
profile image
Re 1: Many aspects are fairly centralized. Each individual aspect also entails risks.

A) The hashpower: The two largest mining pools control 53% of the hashpower. The top five mining pools control 82% of the hashpower. Source: mempool.space

B) Bitcoin trading: A few exchanges control the majority of global trading volume. Source: coinmarketcap.com

C) Ownership: Satoshi has about 5% of the BTC supply. Institutional Bitcoin holding is growing. The top 100 addresses control approx. 9% of the available BTC. Source: coinlore.com richlist

D) Mining hardware: There are only 3-4 relevant Bitcoin mining hardware manufacturers, of which Bitmain is by far the leader. Most large pools are probably used by Antminer. I could not find any reliable figures on this.
1
Show answer
Join the conversation