Sometimes I can't shake the suspicion that one or the other user here gets money for promoting junk stocks like a gold treasure.......... Just a feeling, of course!
•
1717
•
@Cato_Bamboo why are you following this junk story then? Nobody is forcing you to read my posts.
I'm just trying to pass on the knowledge I've gained myself in order to offer added value to people who are interested. ✌️
Everyone can draw their own conclusions, make decisions and form their own opinion.
I'm just trying to pass on the knowledge I've gained myself in order to offer added value to people who are interested. ✌️
Everyone can draw their own conclusions, make decisions and form their own opinion.
•
1212
•@Cato_Bamboo What exactly do you think is garbage about $NU? Do you have any arguments for it ?
•
11
•
1Wk
@Cato_Bamboo $NU is far from a junk stock…what are you on about?
•
22
•1Wk
@Cato_Bamboo And it’s the world’s largest neo bank…
•
22
•@BamBamInvest......and I try to interpret your findings from my point of view so that precisely these people can get a second opinion as added value. This is fair......... with a 27.2% price loss in the last 4 weeks, I believe it is completely legitimate. Everyone can draw their own conclusions.
•
33
•@TAHT It's -27,2% in the last 4 weeks!
•
22
•@Cato_Bamboo You are not interpreting and arguing, but rather labeling something as a junk stock without any corresponding arguments. And I have pointed out the fall in the share price and the reasons for it in the last few posts.
Apart from that, anyone who looks at the chart will probably recognize that 😄
You probably know that shares also fall and don't always rise. 😁
But thanks for your interpretation and the warning 🙏😉
Apart from that, anyone who looks at the chart will probably recognize that 😄
You probably know that shares also fall and don't always rise. 😁
But thanks for your interpretation and the warning 🙏😉
•
1313
•
@Cato_Bamboo I always think it makes sense to read second opinions. However, they should also be supported by conclusive arguments. The share price performance of the last four weeks alone is not a sufficient argument. For one thing, the period under review is far too short. Secondly, it is far too superficial if you don't look at the background.
Two examples. To illustrate why the short-term share price performance is not a sufficient argument (before anyone accuses me of equating $NU with the following companies 😉).
1. $GOOG also plummeted in the short term when Chat-GPT was published. If I had only decided to invest based on the four-week chart back then, I would have missed out on a lot of returns.
2. $UNH: Performance of the last four weeks somewhere around -16%. Does that make it a junk stock?
Two examples. To illustrate why the short-term share price performance is not a sufficient argument (before anyone accuses me of equating $NU with the following companies 😉).
1. $GOOG also plummeted in the short term when Chat-GPT was published. If I had only decided to invest based on the four-week chart back then, I would have missed out on a lot of returns.
2. $UNH: Performance of the last four weeks somewhere around -16%. Does that make it a junk stock?
•
22
•
@Cato_Bamboo So in your eyes $NOVO B is also a junk stock? It even lost 20% in one week
•
11
•@Hotte1909 Nonsense, I bought them after the crash.....🙄
•
11
•