9Mon·

Who can resist such courses?


I have increased my position from $AFX (-1.31%) once again.


For me, this is a clear case of "quality companies should be bought cheaply". And so I buy in tranches when I can get the Zeiss share at a lower price.


I'd love to hear your opinions. I am curious!

04.09
Carl Zeiss Meditec logo
Bought x5 at €60.95
€304.75
17
32 Comments

profile image
But they are already too heavily weighted for a small cap in my portfolio
2
View all 18 further answers
profile image
Super company! Both as a supplier to ASML and their high-resolution microscopes. Loved them during my time in the lab 👍🏻
2
profile image
@Tojasoku Isn't ASML's business with the other Carl Zeiss divisions?
3
profile image
@topicswithhead My mistake, you may be right. I haven't dealt much with Zeiss shares.
profile image
@topicswithhead correct, ASML has a stake in Optik GmbH, which is majority-owned by the Carl Zeiss Foundation, I believe. Not listed on the stock exchange😉. It also has a significant stake in Trumpf Laser, so it is already very well positioned with the most important suppliers.
2
profile image
@All-in-or-nothing interesting, makes ASML even more exciting, as there are fewer dependencies 👍🏻
2
profile image
Why is the share performing so badly at the moment?
1
profile image
I think that the market has neither German shares nor small caps on its radar.
Qualitatively, however, the company is doing well. You have to observe whether profits remain stable and whether medical institutions, for example, continue to invest in Zeiss products.
In addition, a large part of the healthcare sector is currently unpopular.

These could be possible reasons for this. 👍🤔
1
profile image
@Rendite_Fux okay thanks for the info :)
profile image
Its on my blacklist actually
1
profile image
@user_not_found blacklist means Watchlist?
profile image
@Rendite_Fux it means i avoid it far away. Have worked there many years, loved it but I had bad experience with how they manage their finances and what decisions they keep making. They will definitely be here for the next 50 years but their current track is painful to watch. Since my investment horizon is less than 50 years I cant wait out a major change in their management. Decisions (that make at least sense) weight more in leading a company than quality (yes their stuffs are top-noch).
1
profile image
5 shares... hardly worth it
1
profile image
@Hugo312 surely depends on the position size and its weighting, doesn't it?
Join the conversation