10Mon
However, I think that the result should be taken into account when evaluating a decision. For example, you can have done a great job analyzing a stock and still make a loss. But it's just wrong to base everything on the result. This text should actually be sent to everyone who thinks they're a genius because they played with Gamestop and achieved a good result. Most people have lost with Gamestop.
•
11
•
10Mon
@FinanzFell Hi, thank you very much, as I am writing to you on my cell phone, my answer will be a bit shorter. Sorry, but have a look at the two previous posts. Market anomalies and the ownership effect. A lot of things flow into us when we analyze, buy or sell shares. A lot of things are not entirely comprehensible. e.g. the ECB raises interest rates, the market rises, a week later the Fed does not raise interest rates and the market collapses. So the question would be, would the market have risen if the Fed had raised interest rates? Or would they have stayed the same or fallen as well? Everyone has their expectations. Because thinking purely rationally, if interest rates are the same, then nothing has really changed and the market should have seen this as "normal", right? Addendum: But you are always measured by results!
••