LoginSignup
immagine del profilo
Dominic
@BregisMoon
1Anno·
2
6 Commenti
immagine del profilo
Nico Uhlig@RealMichaelScott
1Anno
It may be true that they are valued much more favorably. The question that should always be asked is: why? One answer could be the high debts that weigh on the company. EBIT of about $900 million is offset by net debt of almost $6 billion. On top of that, it is the smallest player in the industrial gas oligopoly. The risks are simply greater than for the other three companies.
•
6
•
Utente eliminato
1Anno
Il commento è stato cancellato
immagine del profilo
Nico Uhlig@RealMichaelScott
1Anno
@Boarkeinname Firstly, who else do they want to take over in a market that is virtually controlled by four companies? Secondly, they would probably have to take on new debt and that would not be so advantageous at the current level of debt.
••
Visualizza un'altra risposta
immagine del profilo
Dominic@BregisMoon
1Anno
Just wanted to say: 72% YtD performance 😜
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Hannes@Hannes_SK
1Anno
Valued much more favorably as they are de facto irrelevant. Even in the Far East, Linde and Air Liquide dominate. The company's only notable achievement was the acquisition of Praxair's production facilities in the merger. 😅
••
immagine del profilo
CD@Carpe-Diem
1Anno
.I prefer to think of local or regional big players in the energy sector rather than global ones.
••
Partecipa alla conversazione
IscrivitiAccesso