7Mes·

The Fidelity Emerging Markets Quality Income UCITS ETF $FYEM (+0,09%) unfortunately has to go.

attachment

The Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Market $PEH (-0,25%) better reflects the quality factor in the emerging markets in my opinion.

I just never had it on my radar because it has such a meaningless name.

No bullshit @InvescoDACH What am I supposed to do with "RAFI"?

Rarely attractive financial instrument?

However, it has another shortcoming: with a fund size of ~ 35 million, it's really small... you can laugh at me if it's liquidated soon. 😘

07.06
10
8 Commenti

immagine del profilo
https://www.boerse.de/boersenlexikon/RAFI-Index#:~:text=Beim%20eigenen%20Typus%20der%20RAFI,einem%20%C3%9Cbergewicht%20%C3%BCberbewerteter%20Aktien%20vorgebeugt.
2
immagine del profilo
@Stullen-Portfolio I just wanted to annoy the Invesco people. ... who are probably no longer on getquin 😅
1
Visualizza un'altra risposta
immagine del profilo
35 million is really not much for a fund that was launched back in 2007. On the other hand, however, it is plausible to assume that Invesco has staying power and will continue to operate the ETF, otherwise it would have been closed long ago 👍
1
immagine del profilo
what is the weighting? China 40% ?
immagine del profilo
@Testo-Investor see what @Stullen-Portfolio has posted:
RAFI indices (Research Affiliates Fundamental Indexing) determine fundamental metrics such as sales, cash flow, dividends, book value and number of employees rather than pure market capitalization weighting.

China has 31% at the moment
1
immagine del profilo
Interesting, what are the differences between the two ETFs?
immagine del profilo
@mhu The invesco takes greater account of market capitalization and still has a value screening. The composition is therefore completely different:
https://extraetf.com/de/etf-comparison?products=IE00B23D9570-etf,IE00BYSX4739-etf
immagine del profilo
I've been looking for a good EM ETF that pays out dividends for a while now. I think this one is quite nice, only 2 things bother me here.
Firstly, the low fund volume mentioned by you despite the duration of the fund.
Secondly, I don't like the fact that South Korea is considered an industrialized country due to its FTSE classification and is therefore completely absent here. As my other ETFs are geared towards MSCI, I would miss South Korea completely.
Partecipa alla conversazione