6G·

Traditional brand Knorr is about to be sold to the USA

$ULVR (+0,54%)

$MKC (+1,05%)

The British consumer goods giant Unilever is considering a sale worth billions. This would also affect the traditional German brand Knorr.


The traditional German brand Knorr could soon change hands. The British consumer goods group Unilever is negotiating the sale of its food division to the US spice manufacturer McCormick & Company. Unilever announced on Friday that it had received a corresponding purchase offer from its smaller rival. The division also includes brands such as Hellmann's, Colman's and Marmite.


However, it remains to be seen whether an agreement will actually be reached. Both companies emphasized in separate announcements that there is no certainty that the talks will be concluded. They did not provide any financial details. Last year, the division accounted for around a quarter of Unilever's turnover and generated sales of more than 12.9 billion euros.


The talks are in line with Unilever CEO Fernando Fernandez's strategy of focusing the group more strongly on higher-margin areas such as beauty and personal care following the spin-off of the ice cream business. The portfolio there includes brands such as Axe, Rexona and Dove. The processed food business, on the other hand, is under pressure across the industry.


Pure share transaction planned


The companies confirmed the negotiations after the Wall Street Journal reported on them on Thursday evening. According to the report, it could be a pure share transaction that could take place in the coming weeks. The Financial Times had already reported in March that Unilever had previously unsuccessfully considered merging its food division with Kraft Heinz's sauces business.


Unilever shares rose around one percent on the stock exchange at the start of trading. However, Tineke Frikkee, portfolio manager at Unilever investor W1M, was skeptical. McCormick is significantly smaller than Unilever's food division, which generates around three times the profit of the US company. It is therefore unclear what added value a joint venture could create.


https://www.t-online.de/finanzen/aktuelles/wirtschaft/id_101179818/knorr-traditions-marke-steht-vor-moeglichem-verkauf-an-us-konzern.html

previw image
14
8 Commenti

immagine del profilo
That's actually absurd. Unilever IS a food company and is constantly selling off its entire food business because it imagines it wants to be a mini-Procter&Gamble.
3
immagine del profilo
@Soprano As far as I have seen, there is a very high margin on Knorr products. Of course, the trend is towards healthy food. But on the other hand, things always have to be quicker. But it's still strange what's happening at Unilever. To get rid of traditional brands like Knorr and Langnese.
immagine del profilo
@Tenbagger2024 They've been doing it this way for years. Before the ice cream business, they got out of spreads. Before that, the tea business. Before that, the fish business. I'd like to hear them explain their model, because from the outside it just looks like they're always selling off their silverware, but then they don't do anything worth mentioning with the billions.
immagine del profilo
@Soprano But that's the case with many of the consumer goods giants. The CEOs are constantly changing and with them the strategy. Everyone wants to reinvent the wheel. At Nestlé, the silverware Galderma was sold off. And now Loreal is happy. That's why I'm not invested in the giants. Driven by high raw material prices, which can no longer be passed on 1:1 to the beleaguered consumer. Consumers are also increasingly turning to the discounters' own brands. How do you think Nestlé and Unilever will be affected by oil prices and fertilizer prices? That's why I'm rather cautious about the consumer giants
1
immagine del profilo
@Soprano I worked for Unilever for a long time until the ice cream separation. It is no secret internally and externally that Unilever has wanted to become a drugstore group for years. With the appointment of CEO Fernando Fernandez, it was clear in which direction it was going. He is an absolute drugstore enthusiast and immediately started with the spin-off from ice cream - it was only a matter of time before it was food's turn.
1
immagine del profilo
@Nuqqx That was also my assumption. Thanks for confirming it. The only question is why. The drugstore segment certainly has higher margins, but are you really so well positioned there? In the cosmetics sector in particular, you can only go for mass-produced goods and can't really play in the interesting "luxury segment".

The detergent segment seems to be solid, but I don't know whether it's enough to be a good washing powder company.

In the food sector, I have always seen Unilever at the top together with Nestle. In the drugstore sector, I think there's a lot of competition and it's stronger. The sector is much more competitive with Procter & Gamble, Loreal, Henkel, Beiersdorf etc. etc.
immagine del profilo
@Soprano I think you overestimate the food segment and underestimate the drugstore segment.

Margins in food were always under pressure. Just take "Kartoffel mal Anders" as an example, it sold like hot cakes everywhere, but the margin was so damn bad that Unilever simply sold it and the Unox brand at the same time. Wet sauces were exactly the same, first Hollandaise (except for Lukull, because that's another "premium" variant) and then the pasta sauces.

Especially in the drugstore sector, premiumization in recent years has made it clear that you can sell items more expensively and pack less in - win / win. That year, I think Dove was named cheat pack of the year and people still bought it.
At least 3 price categories were introduced in almost every brand and enormous margins were achieved as a result.
Unilever also owns some luxury brands in skincare, makeup and haircare.
1
immagine del profilo
@Nuqqx Hm, yes, I don't know. As I said, the margin thing makes sense. But that's why competition is much tougher in the drugstore sector.

I just somehow have the feeling that the expertise and brand portfolio speak more in favor of food.

The fact that you can just raise prices doesn't necessarily show market power, but rather the low level of consumer competence. The fact that there was no outcry may have been less because people are still convinced by the product than because they simply didn't notice it.

I think the really good brand visibility in the drugstore sector is positive. The products are well-known and have a strong presence on the shelves. That's on the plus side.

On the other hand, if you take a closer look at the brands, they often don't have such strong customer loyalty. The best example is duschdas. With their "3 in 1", they appeal to a target group that says it doesn't matter what you wash yourself with, the main thing is clean. People for whom hair care is important buy shampoo, conditioner and hair mask and swear by brand XY. I think Axe is still a good cash flow machine, but also more for people who say "the main thing is to smell good" with the Chocolate fragrance, which last had a lot of hype 15 years ago and has since lost a lot of market share to Old Spice.
Partecipa alla conversazione