LoginSignup
immagine del profilo
Fortunus
@Quiny
2Mes¡

$WINC vs. $JEGP

I'm interested to know why many $JEGP (-0,36%) in the portfolio, although there is also the $WINC (-0,2%) which pursues a similar strategy but has a higher return and higher distribution so far.

3
18 Commenti
immagine del profilo
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
2Mes
The two have very different profiles. One is strongly oriented towards the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index (JEPG). The other is based instead on the classic MSCI World with its usual composition (WINC). I don't need that in my portfolio, for example. It would be too redundant for me. That's why JPM's active approach is more interesting for me.
•
9
•
immagine del profilo
GeldGenie@GeldGenie
2Mes
Benchmarking function needed? 👍 The ETFs are practically the same, but differ in performance depending on the section, logically due to the reference value. Soooo I can't quite understand your point.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Fortunus@Quiny
2Mes
@GeldGenie Equal is definitely something else for me.
+10,4% != +4,3%
••
immagine del profilo
GeldGenie@GeldGenie
2Mes
@Quiny Sooo in CHF at least it was the difference I quoted. If there was a PN I could show it 😅
••
immagine del profilo
Banana M.@Banana_Millionaire
2Mes
I honestly believe that most people are only interested in the monthly payout 😂
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Fortunus@Quiny
2Mes
@Banana_Millionaire This is even higher at $WINC.
••
immagine del profilo
Banana M.@Banana_Millionaire
2Mes
@Quiny I mean the frequency. The $WINC distributes in January, April, July and October. The $JEGP every month.
It's completely banal, but many people have developed a fetish for it.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
2Mes
@Banana_Millionaire you will probably be right
••
immagine del profilo
Patrick@PaFl
2Mes
The $WINC is "relatively" just under 18 months, I think. The volume of the ETF has been rising well since then $JEGP has been around for longer and is also better known. If you are purely interested in the distribution and less in the composition, I would give $WINC a chance.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
CieloAzul@Cieloazul
2Mes
The Winc is the same as the Bali in the USA, isn't it?
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
SanSebastian@WarrenamBuffet
2Mes
@Cieloazul sure? But yes, it looks very similar...
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
2Mes
Not quite. $INCU corresponds $BALI
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
Stefan@Da_Fischi
2Mes
Because of the volatility, you can see the difference between the two very well in April.
••
immagine del profilo
Oleg@ScorpionfromBW
2Mes
Perhaps because of the TER, which is more than twice as low, and the fund volume, which is more than 10 times higher? In addition, the values and the breakdown are already different
••
immagine del profilo
SanSebastian@WarrenamBuffet
2Mes
@ScorpionfromBW the display here is not correct, both have TER 0.35
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Oleg@ScorpionfromBW
2Mes
@WarrenamBuffet ok, I didn't know that.
••
immagine del profilo
SanSebastian@WarrenamBuffet
2Mes
@ScorpionfromBW yes that annoys me about getquin, some of the data is old or simply not correct
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
Beleggen M.@fund_whisperer_1682
2Mes
I agree, but better safe then sorry, got them both in my portfolio
••
Partecipa alla conversazione
IscrivitiAccesso