5GĀ·

How much do you trust your AI queries?

I wanted to do a little AI research today on $ZPRG (+0,55%) . The AI simply failed several times to give me the right ETF. I was surprised and called it out on it. šŸ˜…

Its response:

attachment

Now my question to you: How much do you actually trust your AI’s recommendations? I mean, it’s really bad if it spits out the wrong stock analysis and you end up buying based on it.

5
32 Commenti

immagine del profilo
The quality of the input determines the quality of the output.šŸ¤·šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø So far, I've been getting more than acceptable responses from every AI for my 12k-character prompt.
•
13
•
immagine del profilo
@Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin I hope you had that generated by AI
••
immagine del profilo
@Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin yes that is true, but sometimes they have really the wrong ETF I don’t know why
••
immagine del profilo
@DonkeyInvestor With AI support, of course. I set the parameters and fine-tuned the model countless times until every AI I've used so far delivers consistent results.
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
@SquarePants if you feed them with correct data and name the accepted sources it never happened to me.
••
Get_Rich_or_Die_Typin
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
@Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin What sources did you list that should or must be used?
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@capital_captain_2693 To check portfolio allocation, including ETFs: official provider websites, as they are required under UCITS regulations to provide information on the full holdings (ā€œactual underlying assetsā€ā€”not just index components, which is relevant for synthetic ETFs); no third-party sources.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin For individual stocks: the company's official website, the most recent quarterly and annual reports, then information from my preferred screener, and only after that third-party sources
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin You could try sharing your prompt somewhere
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@capstone That wouldn't help you guys.šŸ¤·šŸ¼ā€ā™‚ļø My prompt is tailored exactly to what I'm looking for in my portfolio.šŸ˜‰ So it would probably be completely useless for most people here. My prompt helps me build my portfolio, evaluate my asset allocation, and filter suitable companies based on my exact criteria. These criteria don’t have to be the same as anyone else’s—in my view, a prompt for your own portfolio is just as individual as your risk tolerance, investment goals, and so on. But I’m happy to help with questions about creating prompts, troubleshooting issues, and so on.😊
•
2
•
@Aktienhauptmeister or @Raketentoni can give you a good answer to that. They're really advanced with their prompts! I'm really excited 😬
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
So I've configured my AI in the "Basic Settings" so that I only want verifiable statements and no assumptions or guesses. I also specified that I don’t want to read any sugarcoating, flowery language, or other such nonsense, but rather rational statements with justifications and source references. And if something is ambiguous, it should ask for clarification. And if something can’t be found or verified, it should say so clearly.

Admittedly, I haven’t used it much for financial matters yet, but when it comes to self-hosting various tools across a wide range of applications, I get along great with the AI.
It’s important, though, to state very clearly what you need, what you want, and—in my case—which versions of programs and applications you’re using, so that the AI can extract the correct information from the right guides and sources.
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
I only believe what my crystal ball tells me šŸ”®
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
AI has some trouble with ETF ticker symbols. ZPRG is not the universal name for this ETF. On the Deutsche Bƶrse/Xetra, the ticker symbol is ZPRG. However, the same fund with the same ISIN, IE00B9CQXS71, is traded, for example, in London as GBDV (GBP) or GLDV (USD) and in Italy also as GLDV. The better the input, the better the result. In your case, a clear match could not be made, and therefore your question could not be answered satisfactorily.
•
1
•
@Dividendenopi I asked using A1T8GD šŸ˜‰ Here's the link
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@Aktienliebe77 OK, but I still generally recommend asking using the ISIN. That way, the match is clear from the start. Did you repost your question using the ISIN, and what was the result?
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@Aktienliebe77 And my AI always asks for clarification when it can't clearly classify something and wants confirmation or a correction.
•
2
•
@Dividendenopi Yeah, it worked out in the end—though it’s possible I trained her to respond that way with that question... Still, it’s weird—the way she acted; she insisted on her rights three times...šŸ˜…
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@Aktienliebe77 She's got her own feelings, too šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‡
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
On average, about 30% of the answers are said to be incorrect or made up (the error rate varies widely depending on the topic). Just ask your AI about it—it’s pretty interesting ā˜ŗļø
•
1
•
@Da_Fischi šŸ˜…šŸ«” Just wrote this:
"For complex or specialized topics (finance, ETFs, law, niche products): significantly higher, sometimes in the double digits" 🫣
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
I only believe the AI. No one else. I'm sure you're wrong, not the AI.
••
@DonkeyInvestor šŸ˜…šŸ˜…šŸ«”
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@DonkeyInvestor You're making it easy on yourself with Donkthropic—we're dealing with human AI and their emotions here
••
immagine del profilo
@Dividendenopi So, natural stupidity?
••
immagine del profilo
Gemini is much more polite.
••
immagine del profilo
Aren't we all MKI?
••
immagine del profilo
Yes true, also got this sometimes. I only use Claude for this. What do you use?
••
immagine del profilo
What did you find out about $ZPRG?
••
@Bein-Godik AI was constantly spouting nonsense... I actually wanted a comparison between another ETF
••
immagine del profilo
I think the answers generated by my prompt are very accurate. But I’m not even sure how long I spent tinkering with it to create my ā€œmanual.ā€ It involved quite a few revisions and evolved over the course of several months. Now, though, I have a useful additional tool for evaluating my portfolio.
••
Partecipa alla conversazione