9Mes·

Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF - debate on position.

Hi all, I'm keen to understand your thoughts on the following. When would you consider $FGEQ (-0,4%) instead of $VWRL (-0,42%) as the core of a portfolio? What would be the benefit of one above the other? I used to have $VWRL (-0,42%) as core, but have switched over to $FGEQ (-0,4%) with $TDIV (+0,18%) on the side and a little of $IAPD (+0,02%) .


I know they track different indexes, as $FGEQ (-0,4%) track high quality companies from developed markets, while $VWRL (-0,42%) tracks stocks from both developed and emerging countries.

$FGEQ (-0,4%) while lacking emerging countries, still has decent growth.


Would you consider $FGEQ (-0,4%) vs $GGRP (-0,28%) or go for a more quality oriented ETF such as $IS3R (-0,66%) to try to grab a little more return?


I'm reconsidering my positions and wondering if I should move some of them around and/or back to where they came from. I've done some DYOR, which has for now lead me to the conclusion to keep $FGEQ (-0,4%) as the main position and expand a bit into $IS3R (-0,66%) on the side.


Wondering what your thoughts are :)

8
3 Commenti

immagine del profilo
I‘m having both. Even added further ETF to get a monthly dividend and still get nice growth
5
Visualizza tutti 2 ulteriori risposte
Partecipa alla conversazione