11Mes·

"Ethical disaster": Big Tech finances Trump's ballroom. 🍊 And the oligarchs

Booz Allen Hamilton share: plunge after figures shock

https://www.ad-hoc-news.de/boerse/ueberblick/booz-allen-hamilton-aktie-absturz-nach-zahlen-schock/68296852

My dears, $BAH (+0,09%) have not yet been able to profit as one of the donors.

I am missing from the donor list $TSLA (+4,57%) .


Google, Apple, Microsoft: they're all opening their pockets for Trump's ceremonial hall. Naturally, they are hoping for something in return


The excavators are already rolling: on Monday, demolition work began on the East Wing of the White House to make way for a gigantic ballroom. The 8360 square meter showpiece will seat up to 1000 guests in the future - and will be completely privately financed. After much procrastination, the White House has published the list of donors. In addition to the entire squad of tech giants, it also includes half the crypto world as well as arms companies and, of course, Peter Thiel's Palantir.


Tech companies as major sponsors


Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta and Microsoft - the world's most powerful technology companies are among the list of sponsors. Alphabet, Google's parent company, is contributing 22 million dollars alone - around seven percent of the estimated total costs, as reported by CNBC. However, this amount comes from a settlement payment: Trump had sued YouTube after the platform blocked his account following the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021.


The crypto industry has also been generous: Coinbase, Ripple, Tether America and the Winklevoss twins Cameron and Tyler are among the sponsors of the project.


Change in Silicon Valley


While Silicon Valley was still distant during Trump's first term in office in 2016, it is now demonstratively close. Meta, for example, did not donate a cent for the inauguration - this time it was one million dollars. Amazon increased its contributions from 58,000 to one million dollars.


The donors are


Altria Group Inc.

Amazon

Apple

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

Coinbase

Comcast Corporation

J. Pepe and Emilia Fanjul

Hard Rock International

Google Inc.

HP Inc.

Lockheed Martin

Meta Platforms

Micron Technology

Microsoft

NextEra Energy Inc.

Palantir Technologies Inc.

Ripple

Reynolds American

T-Mobile

Tether America

Union Pacific Railroad

Adelson Family Foundation

Stefan E. Brodie

Betty Wold Johnson Foundation

Charles and Marissa Cascarilla

Edward and Shari Glazer

Harold Hamm

Benjamin Leon Jr.

The Lutnick Family

The Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Foundation

Stephen A. Schwarzmann

Konstantin Sokolov

Kelly Loeffler and Jeff Sprecher

Paolo Tiramani

Cameron Winklevoss

Tyler Winklevoss


The reasons for this change of heart are obvious: many tech giants are under pressure from antitrust law. However, Trump's administration is pursuing a much less aggressive competition policy than the Biden administration. Under Trump, the FTC has already announced that it will look less closely.


Trump: "I'll take it"


Critics see the fundraiser as a clear case of "pay-to-play", buying access to power, according to the BBC. "I see this huge ballroom as an ethical disaster," says Richard Painter, former White House ethics adviser under President George W. Bush. "These corporations all want something from the government."


Potential major donors were already invited to a fundraising gala dinner at the White House in mid-October - including representatives from Microsoft, Amazon and Google. According to leaked documents, donors are to receive "recognition", possibly in the form of engraved names in the building. Trump himself joked at the event that some guests had asked whether 25 million dollars would be an appropriate donation. His answer: "I'll take it."


Political calculation


The White House rejects all accusations: the ballroom will also serve future governments and taxpayers will not pay a cent. In fact, the government plans to handle the donations through the Trust for the National Mall, a non-profit organization that works with the National Park Service.


There will be little legal proof of wrongdoing. "You can't prove quid pro quo," Painter says. "But the Trump administration is clearly testing boundaries here."


The construction costs for the State Hall have already risen from the original 200 to 300 million dollars. The White House will announce later how much Trump himself will contribute. (pez, 24.10.2025)


https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000293484/ethisches-desaster-big-tech-finanziert-trumps-ballsaal

previw image
11
14 Commenti

immagine del profilo
11Mes
Big, Beautiful, Banana Republic.
•
12
•
immagine del profilo
@Epi A never-ending wet dream for those involved.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
11Mes
@Ash More like a wet dream. In the long term, they are destroying the very thing that made them great.
•
4
•
immagine del profilo
@Epi I just realized that we are paying for this... So we as shareholders ... I would like Black Rock Invesco and Fidelity to bring this up at the next AGMs... 🥲
••
immagine del profilo
11Mes
@TotallyLost In what way do you think we have to pay for the banana republic?
At the moment, the corporations are trying to bribe Trump to keep their monopolies.
••
immagine del profilo
@Epi Well, this building was paid for by donations from companies... as a shareholder, that's your money. 😅
It's always so abstract when you read company X spends X billion on Z investments. But in the end, X is the property of the investors.
And a ballroom probably has an ROI of ~0.
••
My dear. But something like that!
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
"You can't prove anything in return" - but you can run smear campaigns - wonderful 😂
••
immagine del profilo
@PaulPK What I always find impressive is that she has her own side with many bird freedom.

If "the others" did the same, it would be a scandal, even the suspicion is enough. But their own team is allowed to rot in the penalty area. 🙄

If different rules apply to different teams, you should consider that you're in some kind of cult.
••
immagine del profilo
@TotallyLost Well, the White House has provided a plausible explanation here... That should be the end of the matter.
••
immagine del profilo
@PaulPK So you don't see a conflict of interest?
Scholz also had a good explanation... He forgot ...

I once worked in a bank and not even the janitor was allowed to accept gifts > €15. It's called "compliance". (Not even the bank as an institution)

This is done to minimize conflicts of interest, but it looks like different rules apply for those up there... And no one cares anymore.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
@TotallyLost Yes. But he's not building it for himself privately, and everything is completely transparent. Probably not comparable with Scholz, Nancy etc.
••
immagine del profilo
Unfortunately, It has always been like this… even with worse agendas
••
Partecipa alla conversazione