3Mes·

CATL boss: Musk has no idea about batteries, 4680 cell will fail.

$TSLA (-4,32%)
$300750


Summary

CATL boss Robin Zeng criticizes Tesla's new 4680 battery cells

Zeng: Elon Musk knows nothing about battery manufacturing

Tesla struggles with cost and production problems for new cells

CATL is the world's largest manufacturer of e-car batteries

Zeng criticizes Musk's unrealistic timetables for developments

Despite criticism: Zeng respects Musk's innovative spirit in other areas

Whether Tesla's 4680 cells will be successful remains to be seen


Tesla's new battery cells will "fail and never succeed". This is the opinion of Robin Zeng, founder of the Chinese battery manufacturer CATL, who strongly criticizes Elon Musk's latest technology decision.


Musk puts Tesla team under pressure

According to the company, the "tabless" 4680 cell developed by Tesla should offer five times more energy capacity than conventional batteries. Tesla announced in September that it had already produced 100 million of these cells, but according to a report by The Information, the company is still struggling with cost and production problems. However, Musk is said to have given his team a deadline of the end of the year to solve these challenges.


Zeng told Reuters that he and Musk had an in-depth discussion about the technology during a meeting in China in April. "I showed him and he was quiet," Zeng said. In his opinion, Musk does not know how to make batteries. Nevertheless, he admitted that the Tesla boss was talented in other areas such as software, hardware and mechanics.


CATL, the world's largest manufacturer of batteries for electric vehicles, supplies batteries for Teslas in China and for Ford models such as the Mustang Mach-E and the F-150 Lightning in North America, among others. CATL specializes in lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which offer less range but are cheaper and more durable.


Tight time frame

Zeng also commented on Musk's handling of schedules. He criticized the Tesla boss for regularly setting unrealistic deadlines - a problem that is also evident in the development of full self-driving technology, for example. "Maybe it takes five years, but he says two years," said Zeng. When asked why Musk was proceeding in this way, he replied that he wanted to put pressure on his employees.


Despite the differences, Zeng seems to respect Musk's innovative spirit, but sees clear weaknesses in his battery knowledge. It remains to be seen whether the controversial 4680 cells will actually bring about a breakthrough - the competition from CATL certainly seems convinced that the approach is doomed to failure.


https://m.winfuture.de/news/146796

previw image
13
4 Commenti

Utente eliminato
3Mes
Il commento è stato cancellato
immagine del profilo
@Michael-official
E-mobility remains an exciting topic.
3
@Michael-official The last sentence of the report summarizes everything perfectly:

"In any case, the competition seems convinced that the approach is doomed to failure" and CATL is specialized in a different battery cell. Perhaps there is a fear of losing a customer/order. 🤷

I think you always boil this with too hot water, because if you look back, not every type of combustion engine was a breakthrough, some were just rubbish and were discontinued after development and testing.

E-mobility is still at the beginning of the whole development, although it has already made a lot of progress.
A lot will happen in the next few years and we will see whether other drive technologies will/can catch on alongside e-technology.

But without a spirit of innovation, nothing will ever happen and we will realize in x years:
Oh shit, we're out of oil. How will we get from A to B?

And to be honest:
As if CATL doesn't set equally tight and strict deadlines for their employees. 🤣 I immediately (don't) believe that they always have realistic and comfortable schedules...
immagine del profilo
@MoneyISnotREAL
In my personal opinion, the disadvantages of e-mobility are still relatively high and therefore it is not the ideal solution and should only be considered as a transition.
2
Partecipa alla conversazione