Jarvan IV
@profit_mogul_522
2Anno¡
9Posizioni
3,24%
5
7 Commenti
immagine del profilo
beardonfire@beardonfire
2Anno
It doesn’t show the % allocation. Another thing why just not invest in 1 like $SPYI?
•
1
•
Jarvan IV@profit_mogul_522
2Anno
@beardonfire thanks for letting me know! I have just edited the post to give the info

I considered this option indeed but I would feel less comfortable having only 1 ETF because it would have less flexibility to rebalance the portfolio ;

because they have different growth profiles but my goal is to keep a balanced split among geographies and sectors (it’s currently 60% exposed to the US and would like to bring it down to 50% and also keep technology at 20% instead of 25% currently)
••
immagine del profilo
SarkasmusSchlumpf@SchlaubiSchlumpf
2Anno
I would throw out the high div, the last 3 too, scale the rest up accordingly and then throw it into a backtest.
The Japan share is already quite high. But if you like it... that's just my view of things. You can also throw this combination into a backtest for comparison (if they are possible far enough back) and compare the results. (Attention: the period under consideration should be the same), less than 15 years makes little sense) could therefore be difficult in your case.
•
1
•
Jarvan IV@profit_mogul_522
2Anno
@SchlaubiSchlumpf thanks for the input!
••
immagine del profilo
SarkasmusSchlumpf@SchlaubiSchlumpf
2Anno
@profit_mogul_522 oh you asked in English. Sorry forgot. I hope the translation of getquin worked fine?
•
2
•
Jarvan IV@profit_mogul_522
2Anno
@SchlaubiSchlumpf It’s automatically translated so no worries :)
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Harris K.@Kiakotos81
1Anno
I have quite the same. One S&P, the Euro Stoxx, the Vanguard High Divident but I add also the Msci ex Us (for diversification). I didn’t want to split into many etfs. I believe 4-5 are enough.

On the contrary who am I to tell you anything, Better stick to few etfs.
••
Partecipa alla conversazione
IscrivitiAccesso