4H·

Trump's new tariffs, rising inflation and a trade war on the horizon?

In the following post, I would like to discuss the new US tariffs and their potential economic consequences. The background and possible effects on inflation and companies, as well as the winners and losers on the stock market, will be discussed.


Again, of course, the stocks mentioned do not constitute investment advice, but merely serve as examples of possible beneficiaries or losers of tightening trade restrictions. Historical developments are no guarantee of future returns.

__________


In this post:


  • Influence on inflation
  • New tariffs in force
  • Reaction of the countries
  • Consequences for the global economy
  • Winners & losers
  • Investment opportunities

__________


The topic of "tariffs" is currently not only very present in the media, but the term "tariffs" has also been discussed with a strong increase in the past earnings calls of companies in the S&P 500, as the following chart shows [1].

attachment

The chart shows that the discussion about tariffs has intensified in recent months and is having an ever greater impact on the outlook in companies' annual reports.


The data is presented as a three-month average and broken down into various sectors, including e.g. industry, healthcare, consumer goods, information technology, etc.


I am curious to see how the stock markets will behave in the coming week. In addition to the current reporting season, the topic of "tariffs" will certainly dominate.

After the tough tariffs announced after Trump took office were not immediately enforced and there was a "slight" sigh of relief, there could now be a new reaction on the markets, as there was on Friday evening. slightly was already slightly noticeable on Friday evening when the markets turned towards the evening.


A looming trade conflict could not only affect individual companies, but also further fuel inflation in the US:


💰 Influence on inflation


On January 31, Deutsche Bank published a forecast on the potential impact of tariffs on the inflation rate [2]:

attachment

The chart compares the current forecast with the forecast before the "Trump" era and takes into account various scenarios for the passing on of tariffs (pass-through) by Canada and Mexico.


Two scenarios are considered: one with a 50% pass-through of tariffs (additional increase shown in dark green) and one with a 75% pass-through (light green). It is clear that the inflation rate could rise sharply again this year and fall again by 2027.


🛃 New tariffs in force & further measures planned


As of today, February 1, 2025, the US government and Donald Trump have imposed new import tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China:


  • 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada
  • 10% on imports from China


According to the White House spokesperson, these measures are, among other things, a response to the failure of these countries to stop the influx of fentanyl and illegal immigrants into the USA. [3]


But this is just the beginning:


From mid-February, the USA will also impose tariffs on strategic goods [4], including:


  • computer chips
  • pharmaceuticals
  • Steel, aluminum and copper
  • Oil and gas imports (but only from February 18 with reduced 10% tariffs so as not to burden US petrol prices immediately).



🚨 Trump relies on escalation - Canada announces retaliation


Yesterday, Canadian government representatives, including Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly, tried to prevent the tariffs in Washington, but to no avail.


Trump made it clear before his departure to Mar-a-Lago [5]:


"We have a 200 billion dollar trade deficit with Canada. Why should we subsidize Canada?"


The EU could also soon be targeted, as Trump hinted:


"Absolutely! The European Union has treated us so terribly!"


🔄 Canada's reaction:


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that Canada will not back down and will respond with "swift and robust countermeasures".

The government is planning a three-stage retaliation strategy [5]:


  • 1️⃣ Targeted punitive tariffs on US products coming from Republican states (e.g. orange juice, whiskey, ketchup, peanut butter and motorcycles).


  • 2️⃣ Tariffs on steel products and machine parts from the USA.


  • 3️⃣ Escalation: halting US exports of oil, gas and electricity to Canada.


However, this last step in particular would be a double-edged sword, as Canada is heavily dependent on energy cooperation with the US.


Economic experts in the US are already warning of the consequences of a trade war [5]:


  • The new tariffs could increase the cost of living for an average US household by 800 dollars per year.
  • The oil and gas tariffs could increase the price of petrol in the USA by up to 20 cents per liter.


But Trump remains firm:


"Maybe there will be short-term disruption, but in the long run the tariffs will make us very rich and very strong."


🌎 Possible consequences for the global economy


(a) Rising prices in the USA


  • Technology & electronicsHigher chip prices are hitting companies such as Apple $AAPL (+0,87%) , Dell $DELL and HP $HPQ (-0,13%) as many of their components come from China.


  • Healthcare costs: Pharmaceutical companies such as CVS Health $CVS (+0,33%) and Walgreens Boots Alliance $WBA (-3,23%) are facing higher purchasing costs.



(b) Retaliation & new trade wars?




(c) Effects on the stock market


  • Volatility is increasing as there is uncertainty about the consequences for various industries.


  • Particularly affected: Technology and automotive stocks with global supply chains.



🏆 Winners & losers - which companies will benefit, which will suffer?


Possible beneficiaries of the tariffs


US manufacturers of steel, aluminum & copper



Domestic pharmaceutical and biotech companies



Energy companies with US production



Chip manufacturers with US production




😥 Companies that could suffer from the tariffs


Chip manufacturers with global supply chains



Car manufacturers with global suppliers



Companies with strong export business



US retailers with a high import share




🧠 Possible investment strategies

Favor defensive sectors:



Exploit long-term opportunities in "reshoring":




Conclusion: Will the trade conflict escalate further?


With the new tariffs, Trump is taking a confrontational stance and Canada, Mexico and China are preparing for retaliatory measures. If further tariffs on European goods follow, the situation could worsen.


❓Which stocks do you think could be most affected? Which beneficiaries do you see?


Thanks for reading! 🤝


__________


Sources:


[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/yahoo-finance-chartbook-44-charts-that-tell-the-story-of-markets-and-the-economy-to-start-2025-105856766.html


[2] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/2-charts-show-why-markets-are-skittish-about-trumps-tariff-policy-144318249.html


[3] https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/usa-unter-trump/trumps-verhaengt-zoelle-gegen-kanada-mexiko-und-china-110269990.html?

[4]

https://www.finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2025-01/64440108-trump-usa-werden-ab-mitte-februar-zoelle-auf-computerchips-stahl-sowie-oel-und-gasimporte-erheben-015.htm


[5] https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/amerika/usa-trump-strafzoelle-100.html

21
28 Commenti

immagine del profilo
Foreign trade deficit = subsidies...
Yes, of course, Donald, and now please inject yourself with disinfectant. 🫠
4
@PowerWordChill don't seem to know much about the subject?
1
immagine del profilo
@PowerWordChill What makes you think that?
Do you have a different opinion? If so, please explain, I'm very curious to know how you intend to reconcile these two things.
1
@PowerWordChill damn you are factually interested, just wanted to troll but: High subsidies for domestic producers can make imports less attractive and increase exports, which can reduce a trade deficit. So understand that Trump intends to subsidize the domestic industry to reduce the trade deficit with Canada
immagine del profilo
EDIT: since 2021, the trade deficit is probably actually -244 bn $.

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c1220.html

@stocker_328 @PowerWordChill..

Trump's logic: If the USA imports more from Canada than it exports (trade deficit), then it is indirectly "subsidizing" Canada because Canada benefits more from this trade.

EDIT see above.

USA-Canada trade balance
According to official statistics: the USA has not had a trade deficit of USD 200 billion with Canada in recent years.

In fact, trade between the two countries is relatively balanced:
The US exports approximately USD 300 billion worth of goods and services to Canada each year.

The USA imports a similar amount of goods and services from Canada.

Depending on the method of calculation, there is sometimes a small deficit or a surplus.

It suggests that the USA is being economically "exploited" by Canada.

He used this to justify tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum imports as well as the renegotiation.

In terms of classification:

Trade is not a "subsidy": a trade deficit does not mean that one country is financing the other.

Canada is one of the largest buyers of US products: So punitive tariffs also hurt US companies.

Conclusion:

Trump's statement was a simplification of trade relations with Canada, presumably to underpin his "America First" policy. In reality, trade flows between the US and Canada are balanced and both countries benefit from each other.
1
@VPT sorry, but the source is more than questionable.
immagine del profilo
@stocker_328 the figures seem to be correct:
https://www.ceicdata.com/de/indicator/canada/total-exports-to-usa#:~:text=Kanadas%20Gesamtexporte%20nach%20USA%20belief,Durchschnitt%20von%2023%2C331.015%20USD%20Mio.

Or if you'd like it from a government site:
https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/americas/canada

Have you found other figures?
immagine del profilo
@VPT @stocker_328 better fact check official US government site: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c1220.html
Edit: over the last 4 years you get 200+ billion dollars
3
immagine del profilo
@intelligent_invest_99 thanks for the addition. But the export sums are really not insignificant for the USA 🥲
1
immagine del profilo
@PowerWordChill I see the whole thing basically like this: Why do I subsidize something or try to protect it with tariffs?
Because it is obviously not competitive on its own. Does eliminating the competition make it more robust?

I always think of the example of American cotton, which was or continues to be subsidized so much (I'm not up to date on this) that it depresses the price of African cotton to such an extent that African producers could/can barely survive from growing it, even though it is/was grown much more sustainably. In the end, this is a completely inefficient approach in which everyone involved loses in the long term.

Or England in the 19th century, which imposed high tariffs on German products and also passed a trademark law which stipulated that products from Germany had to bear the words "Made in Germany" from then on. This was triggered by British producers' concerns about German competition.

We all know the outcome of the story: "Made in Germany" went from being a warning sign to a seal of quality. In the long term, the British domestic market was not strengthened but weakened.

In the end, as in nature, the most innovative and resilient always prevail. I doubt whether I am promoting these characteristics by creating an artificial biotope through relatively high tariffs.
But hey, Donald only has four more years. Until the consequences of his actions are felt in full force, he is no longer POTUS - at least I hope so, otherwise we have completely different problems, I'll just say this much: at the end of last year a movie with Wagner Moura was shown in the cinemas - and can - as usual with him - blame it on others.
2
immagine del profilo
Thanks for the analysis. I can see the next 4 years are going to be fun. 🫨
1
immagine del profilo
@Semos25 the 4 years are getting wild 🙂
immagine del profilo
Great contribution. Not even 20 minutes to read this time 😁
1
immagine del profilo
@DonkeyInvestor thank you 🤩!
Now I feel knighted ⚔️
immagine del profilo
@VPT Lucky for you. I usually slay knights
immagine del profilo
@DonkeyInvestor then the day can hardly get any better 🍀
1
immagine del profilo
I am very curious to see how the markets will react on Monday, thanks for the article!
1
immagine del profilo
2
immagine del profilo
immagine del profilo
Great! That's why I'm here. Many thanks ✌🏻
1
immagine del profilo
@Anderle You are welcome to ✌️
immagine del profilo
I think if it goes down next week it will be short term and a good opportunity to buy. I try to have as much cash available as possible
1
immagine del profilo
@Tobi60 that's how I see it too. 📈
immagine del profilo
This is getting wild
1
Thanks!
1
immagine del profilo
@FinaceSF Thank you! 🤝
immagine del profilo
You mentioned Chesapeake Energy $CHK in your list. They have since changed their name to Expand Energy.

PS: you are welcome to delete my comment
immagine del profilo
@7Trader thanks for the tip, that's right, but the abbreviation should still fit. 👍
Partecipa alla conversazione