Utente eliminato
11Mes
Il commento è stato cancellato
@Thommy98 yes, I also believe that he had a problem with the COVID procedures and therefore has mistrust. mRNA has an increased probability of rejection (compared to vectors) and the autoimmune diseases are tested individually. I haven't read anywhere about the payments, at least that you still have to pay them back. I've already mentioned the rest.
••
Utente eliminato
11Mes
Il commento è stato cancellato
@Thommy98 I had the subjects during the Corona period and am simply referring to the lecturer and the reading. He may well be talking nonsense, but I trust him (also DR. Pharmzeut) more than the founder of curevac.
••
11Mes
@Thommy98 1. ignorance: The information comes from BusinessInsider from 2020. also the information with the share launch of BioNTech in Oct 2019. I think the share launch without products and without market exposure is bullshit. 5 months later it was clear to me where the journey was going. Everyone can decide for themselves what they think. The state made payments to BioNTech and Curavac and whether you believe it or not, I don't really care.
2. the RSV vaccination is nothing more than a virus vaccination like the COVID-19 vaccination. We were talking about cancer or poison. The options there are simply better. For a virus vaccination, mrna is not recommended, see statements by Prof. Dr. Hockertz etc. 3. gravity: You cannot patent gravity, but you can patent products that create gravity or make systems inherently safe, such as heat exchangers. Your statement is therefore bullshit. There are indeed patents for heat exchangers for gravity circulation, for example. Mrna is only a transportation method, the know-how is given by the change of state or the transported goods in connection with the antivirus and is therefore patentable. 4. you clearly say no, I have to disagree with you: 2.3 Printed matter 18/16664 Bavarian State Parliament: The hazard assessment "... cannot be answered for lipid nanoparticles in general." Allergic reactions are possible.
5. look at the development of the BioNTech share. Outlooks, trends, profit expectations and price targets are constantly being revised downwards by analysts. I like to invest in the company. I am a realist. The hype is over and I really don't see a new upward trend.
2. the RSV vaccination is nothing more than a virus vaccination like the COVID-19 vaccination. We were talking about cancer or poison. The options there are simply better. For a virus vaccination, mrna is not recommended, see statements by Prof. Dr. Hockertz etc. 3. gravity: You cannot patent gravity, but you can patent products that create gravity or make systems inherently safe, such as heat exchangers. Your statement is therefore bullshit. There are indeed patents for heat exchangers for gravity circulation, for example. Mrna is only a transportation method, the know-how is given by the change of state or the transported goods in connection with the antivirus and is therefore patentable. 4. you clearly say no, I have to disagree with you: 2.3 Printed matter 18/16664 Bavarian State Parliament: The hazard assessment "... cannot be answered for lipid nanoparticles in general." Allergic reactions are possible.
5. look at the development of the BioNTech share. Outlooks, trends, profit expectations and price targets are constantly being revised downwards by analysts. I like to invest in the company. I am a realist. The hype is over and I really don't see a new upward trend.
••