Non trovato

~ Michael 💎 🏅 · 2024-10-05T07:08:31.559711Z

Die Ubisoft $UBI-Aktie steigt aufgrund von Übernahmegerüchten, da der chinesische 🇨🇳Technologiekonzern Tencent $700 Interesse am französischen 🇫🇷 Spieleentwickler zeigt. Tencent und die Guillemot-Familie prüfen Optionen zur Stabilisierung des Unternehmens, dessen Wert in diesem Jahr um über 50 Prozent gesunken ist. Tencent hält bereits 9,2 Prozent der Stimmrechte, die Guillemot-Familie etwa 20,5 Prozent. Obwohl die Aktien in Paris um bis zu 33 Prozent zulegten, hat die Aktie im Jahresverlauf rund 40 Prozent verloren. Ubisoft kämpft mit schwacher Geschäftsentwicklung, insbesondere durch verzögerte Spieleveröffentlichungen.

~ Michael 💎 🏅

@Michael-official

3Mes·

The Ubisoft
$UBI (-1,84%)-share price rises on takeover rumors as Chinese 🇨🇳Technologiekonzern Tencent
$700 (-0,22%) shows interest in the French 🇫🇷 game developer. Tencent and the Guillemot family are examining options to stabilize the company, whose value has fallen by over 50 percent this year.

Tencent already holds 9,2 percent of the voting rights, which Guillemot-family holds around 20,5 percent.

Although the shares in Paris by up to 33 percent, the share price fell by around 40 percent over the course of the year.

Ubisoft is struggling with weak
business developmentespecially due to delayed game releases.

11 Commenti

Schweizer_Investor@Alumdria

3Mes

I would prefer Ubisoft to be taken over by Sony. Then good games will finally be made again. Ubisoft used to be my favorite game developer. Too bad what happened to it😪

•

PowerWordChill@PowerWordChill

3Mes

And above all, they are struggling to deliver monotonous, standardized mash. They rank alongside EA and Activision Blizzard when it comes to creativity... plain vanilla as fuck...

You're not Anno 1800, you're coll 😘

•

Enrique@Dividenden_Monteur

3Mes

@PowerWordChill I would also classify the two South Park games as a good thing from Ubisoft.
But of course there's nothing like Anno

•

Patrick Schäfer@Hotte1909

3Mes

You just rely on your top sellers like Far Cry or Assassin's Creed and the Tom Clancy series. There's not much new to it and at some point it just gets stale. In addition, the development costs are significantly lower than for games like EAFC compared to the profit. Thanks to Ultimate Team, they have a huge community that regularly brings in money. You buy Far Cry more to play through it. You might buy the odd DLC, but that's it.

••

Staatsmann@Staatsmann

3Mes

@Hotte1909 FIFA has felt more like a SaaS product than a game for years anyway.

Few innovations, but lots of potential for upsells.

••

Patrick Schäfer@Hotte1909

3Mes

@Staatsmann yay. Ea did a good job with that. In my opinion, the changes in the actual game are so minimal that they are more like an update than a new game. In addition, the single player gameplay is hardly improved so that everything is actually designed for online. And every year you pay 70€ for the game plus what is put into Ultimate. Sometimes when I hear what people put into it, it's sick.
Blizzard does a similar thing with wow. I can't think of any Ubisoft titles that are structured like that. But I'm also not that into the games industry. There's actually only one game running on my PS5 and that's Farming Simulator, which I don't play myself very often, but mostly the kid.

•

Staatsmann@Staatsmann

3Mes

@Hotte1909 The difference is that Blizzard also delivers real content with the major expansions, unlike EA.

••

Patrick Schäfer@Hotte1909

3Mes

@Staatsmann as I said, I'm not really into that. Do you have to buy the new versions of WOW? Wasn't it somehow done via memberships that you can play?

••

Staatsmann@Staatsmann

3Mes

@Hotte1909 Partly in part.
You just pay the monthly subscription and if you always want the latest add-ons, you have a one-off purchase.
If you wait a little longer, the older add-ons are also included.

There is also an optional real money store for skins, mounts etc.

••

Patrick Schäfer@Hotte1909

3Mes

@Staatsmann definitely a profitable business. As far as I know, Ubisoft simply doesn't have anything like that. I think something like that was supposed to be introduced with Settlers, but it feels like 100 years ago. I think it was only about being able to play online. Must have been something like that with Settlers 4

••

Staatsmann@Staatsmann

3Mes

@Hotte1909 Settlers is also already online-compulsory.
The "optional" purchases have been patched out for the most part.

••