$DEFI did not receive a warning from Nasdaq for falling below the minimum bid price until March 10, 2026. The warning (also known as a "deficiency notice") does not mean immediate delisting. It is more of an official wake-up call from the stock exchange. If the 180-day period (plus any extensions) elapses without the price rising above USD 1.00, the share usually moves to the OTC markets. What happens if the price does not rise?
If the price is still below USD 1 after 180 days, the share is not automatically gone. There are two typical paths:
Second extension: if the company meets certain other criteria, Nasdaq may grant a second extension for another 180 days.
Reverse stock split (reverse stock split): This is the most common means. For example, if the share price is hovering at USD 0.50, the company carries out a 1:5 split. Suddenly a share is visually worth USD 2.50, but you only have a fifth of the number of shares in your portfolio. The total value remains the same, but the Nasdaq condition is fulfilled. A case for @Tenbagger2024:-) What do you think? Better to get out now at a loss, or is there still a chance of recovery? Of course, it also depends on the cryptos, doesn't it?
If the price is still below USD 1 after 180 days, the share is not automatically gone. There are two typical paths:
Second extension: if the company meets certain other criteria, Nasdaq may grant a second extension for another 180 days.
Reverse stock split (reverse stock split): This is the most common means. For example, if the share price is hovering at USD 0.50, the company carries out a 1:5 split. Suddenly a share is visually worth USD 2.50, but you only have a fifth of the number of shares in your portfolio. The total value remains the same, but the Nasdaq condition is fulfilled. A case for @Tenbagger2024:-) What do you think? Better to get out now at a loss, or is there still a chance of recovery? Of course, it also depends on the cryptos, doesn't it?
•
33
•@schlimmschlimm Reverse splits often cause the price to fall again.
•
11
•@jkb92 Sure, that's not a positive signal. :-(
••
@schlimmschlimm yes, and probably sometimes also due to still active limiters that are not adapted to the new course, right?
•
11
•@jkb92 That's right! That too....
••
