4Settimana·

(ALMOST) EVERYTHING you need to know about options, covered calls and covered call ETFs (written WITHOUT AI):

What are options?

Options are forward transactions. You buy the right to buy an underlying asset from or sell it to the other contracting party at a fixed price.


-> Differentiation between options


European options: The right of the option can only be exercised on the maturity date.


American options: The right through the option can be exercised during the entire period up to the maturity date.


-> What terms should you know about options?


Strike price: The price that the underlying asset must have reached on the maturity date to prevent the option from expiring worthless.


Premium: The price that buyers of the option pay for the option. It is guaranteed to flow into the pocket of the seller of the option.


"in-the-money": Exercise price < price of the underlying asset

"at-the-money": strike price = price of the underlying asset

"out-of-the-money": strike price > price of the underlying asset


Maturity: The day on which the option expires.


Strike ratio: For example, a ratio of 0.1 means that for each option you may buy/sell 0.1 of the underlying if the option is in-the-money on the expiration date.


Spread: Difference between the bid and ask price. The option is bought at the ask price and sold at the bid price. The ask price is therefore always higher than the bid price. This term is universal on the stock exchange.


Liquidity: How easily and quickly the security can be sold. It is said that the smaller the spread (difference between bid and ask price), the more liquid the security is.


Intrinsic value:

For a call option: price of the underlying asset - strike price.

In the case of a put option: strike price - price of the underlying asset.

However, the value cannot be not become negative so that out-of-the-money options have an intrinsic value of 0. For "at-the-money" options, the formula for put and call options also results in 0, as the price of the underlying asset = strike price.


-> "The Greeks"


Delta: How much the price of the option changes if the price of the underlying asset changes by USD 1. This value is often also understood as the probability of the option being "at-the-money" or "in-the-money" on the expiry date.


Gamma: How the delta changes if the price of the underlying changes by USD 1.


Theta: The theta represents the expiration of the option value. How much does the price decrease the closer today's date gets to the expiration date? This value is higher for out-of-the-money options, as there is a risk of a total loss on the expiry date.


Vega: How the price of the option changes if the volatility of the underlying asset changes by 1%.


Rho: How much does the price of the option change if the risk-free interest rate rises or falls by one percentage point.


-> 4 variants of options


Long call (bullish): You are buyer of a call option. You have the right to buy an underlying asset (e.g. an Apple share) on a certain date at a certain price if the underlying asset is above or at the strike price on the expiry date.

Long put (bearish): You are buyer of a put option. You have the right to sell an underlying asset (e.g. an Apple share) on a certain day at a certain price if the underlying asset is above or at the strike price on the expiry date.

Short call (bearish): You are seller of a call option. When the buyer exercises the option, you are obliged to sell him the shares at the strike price if the option is "at-the-money" or "in-the-money" on the expiration date.

Short put (bullish): You are seller of a put option. When the buyer exercises the option, you are obliged to buy the shares from him at the strike price if the option is "at-the-money" or "in-the-money" on the expiration date.


Loss potential of these options


Long call/put: If the option is "out-of-the-money" on the expiration date, it expires and the buyer suffers a total loss equal to the purchase price of his options. This is no longer the case as soon as there is an intrinsic value.

Loss potential: Total loss of the stake


Short call: The receipt of the premium is guaranteed. The seller holds the shares in the securities account for the term or not. If the shares are not held by the seller, a theoretically unlimited loss is possible. unlimited loss is possible. This is because the seller must deliver the shares to the buyer for purchase at any price when the option is exercised.

Loss potential: Lost price gains or unlimited loss


Short put: The receipt of the premium is guaranteed. When the buyer exercises the option, the seller needs a certain amount of money to buy the buyer's shares in the underlying asset on the maturity date.

Loss potential: The seller buys the shares at a higher price than on the market


-> Explanation of covered calls


A covered call is the sale of a call option (short call) where the seller has the shares physically in the securities account in case the options are exercised by the buyer .


-> What is a covered call ETF?


A covered call ETF sells "at-the-money" call options on the shares of an index and collects the premiums by selling these options to the buyers. These are distributed to shareholders in the case of distributing ETFs or retained and reinvested in the case of accumulating ETFs.


-> What happens if the shares and thus the index rise/fall?


If the shares rise, the index takes the premiums, but does not take the full profits of the shares, as the selling price of the shares is fixed when the call options are issued. If the index falls, the options issued expire worthless and the shares are kept with the premiums.

In the event of a bull market, we therefore miss out on price gains and in a bear market we take the entire fall, but our losses are cushioned by the premiums.


-> Can a covered call ETF ever rise?


In principle, if a covered call ETF never holds shares without being tied to a sold call option, it should never rise in the long term. In other words, the ETF does not increase in price with covered calls. Using the example of a Nasdaq-100 covered call ETF, in order to rise in price, it would have to partly track the long-term growth of the Nasdaq-100 and partly issue covered calls on the shares so that the ETF participates in the price increases of the Nasdaq-100. Otherwise, the only trend is likely to be sideways or down while it pays out the premiums.


-> What determines the return on covered call ETFs?


The higher the volatility of the shares in the underlying index, the higher the premiums for the options and therefore the higher the income. Traders pay more for higher potential returns. Therefore, a Nasdaq-100 covered call ETF has a higher payout than a covered call ETF on the S&P 500.


-> What makes a good covered call ETF in my opinion?


  • No large price losses or even long-term gains and acceptable monthly distributions.
  • No complete commitment of all shares to options at any time.


-> Which covered call ETFs are there (incomplete list)?


$QYLE (-1,13%) Global X Nasdaq-100 Covered Call ETF

$QYLG Global X Nasdaq-100 Covered Call & Growth ETF

$QYLD Global X Nasdaq-100 Covered Call ETF

$XYLP (-0,86%) Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

$RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF


My opinion on these covered call ETFs:


$QYLG issues options on only 50% of its shares and holds the other 50% to profit from price increases of the Nasdaq-100. Nevertheless, it offers a dividend yield of approx. 5% p.a. and would therefore be my personal favorite.

$QYLD This ETF has not offered any price appreciation since 2015 and has even made price losses, so it is out of the question for me.

$QYLE (-1,13%) The best-known variant. It offers a fabulous dividend yield of over 10% and has also offered price gains so far. However, it has not yet given me any insight into the extent to which the "TRS CBOE NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite v2 USD" index also holds shares to prevent price losses due to price increases in the Nasdaq-100.


In conclusion, I find this type of passive income very interesting and sustainable, as the distributions are premiums and not company profits, which are dependent on the economic situation.


Thank you for reading :)

94
29 Commenti

immagine del profilo
Thanks for the description
6
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@DividendenWaschbaer Gladly. Took me a few hours :)
1
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
What is your opinion on $JEPQ? It is very popular and now also available in Germany. ( <security:n/a:IE000U9J8HX9> )
2
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@Chandra It says it is not yet tradable in Germany. I have not yet dealt with equity-linked notes.
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@robiin $JEPQ itself is not tradable here either. The German counterpart has been available since November and is the one I linked to in brackets. Where it is tradable is partly described in the comments below.
@robiin I have had the local JEPQ and the QYLE in my portfolio since this year, each with a small position, and am letting them run for 1-2 years as an experiment. The JEPQ is due to pay for the first time in January. With the QYLE I even have a price gain of almost 10%.
immagine del profilo
Very good contribution
2
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@MarketNewsUpdate Thank you very much!
1
immagine del profilo
Thanks!
1
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@Lumimyrsky Thank you!
immagine del profilo
Danke!
1
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@christian With pleasure. Thank you too!
immagine del profilo
3Settimana
Great description I have two in the depot and they are currently doing what they should 🙃
1
immagine del profilo
Please mention above if written with AI, this seems very incomplete to me. (+ Some headings were used twice etc.?)
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@leveragegrinding I wrote everything myself. I didn't use AI. I did some research in a few places and I wanted to structure it uniformly and sort it according to knowledge, so AI wouldn't have helped anyway. So the knowledge about the strike price comes before "in-the-money" etc. and the Greeks according to the known key figures. LG
immagine del profilo
@robiin Why the same headings? Why no section on risks, losses, etc.?
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@leveragegrinding Thanks for the tip. I will add the loss potential to the long/short call/put.
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@leveragegrinding I have written a section on risk. Is it sufficient in your opinion? :)
immagine del profilo
@robiin thank you, I think it's much better with the amount of new ones here :)
1
immagine del profilo
But you can't buy the $QYLG in Germany, can you? I can't find anything. If the value of a pure covered call ETF is not allowed to rise, will the dividends not rise either?
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@Botrux The $QYLD has existed since 2015 and there has been (almost) no dividend increase since then. As far as I can see, it is the long-term experiment of this strategy without any additional aspects to prevent price losses. I have not yet been able to trade $QYLG either. It would also be too good to be true :(
1
immagine del profilo
How can I sell covered calls myself in Germany?
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@Alexander_Bitcoin It depends on the broker whether they offer this. Just do some research.
The only thing I don't understand about the whole thing is: why do people buy such ETFs? None of the ones you linked to have any kind of performance that would tempt me to invest. The basic investment (the actual ETF) brings much more money, with significantly higher security?
Or have I fundamentally misunderstood something?
immagine del profilo
4Settimana
@Gomerdoc Secure and high dividend
immagine del profilo
@Gomerdoc Stable income without draining the substance!
@Alexander_Bitcoin But I also get that if I invest in a much better-performing EDF that reinvests during the time when I don't need the money and then switches to a distributing one afterwards. That's the problem with the ETFs under discussion here: they don't have reasonable price gains, at least not yet.
That was my question. Have I misinterpreted something about these ETFs?
4Settimana
Yes you misinterpreted that we are in a permanent bullrun for 15 years, so indeed performance is lower. In a lot decade however you get dividends + premiums so gains instead of a net 0%. Buying etfs like this is building in security for lost decade or bearmarket, where you loose less, less max gains, more security in case of no bullrun
immagine del profilo
3Settimana
Nice report, I also have QYLD and QYLU in my portfolio and am very satisfied. Both have high dividends and at the same time achieved growth of 17.5% and 15.5% respectively last year. I can live with that 😀
According to the fact sheet, however, QYLD was only launched in 10/2022, so perhaps we're talking about different ETFs... I've linked the fact sheet:
https://docs.extraetf.com/download/IE00BM8R0J59/de/MR/
Here is also the link to the QYLU fact sheet:
https://docs.extraetf.com/download/IE0002L5QB31/en/MR/

I have both ETFs running with a savings plan, growth >15% and a dividend ~8-10% I think is not bad
Partecipa alla conversazione