3Settimana·

+++ Buy these shares +++

For fun, I took a textbook (risk/return) approach with an efficient frontier analysis. This would make you buy these stocks

$AMZN (+1,56%)
$AAPL (+1,23%)
$MSFT (+0,63%)
$GOOGL (+1,8%)
$ORCL (+1,12%) and $NVDA (+2,31%)

Do not buy the following shares:

$TSLA (-3,07%)
$NFLX (-1,61%)
$UBER (-0,67%) and with $META (+0,46%) you can argue!

I also think conservative approaches are good to strengthen his thesis - I have Amazon, Alphabet and Nvidia in my portfolio :)

15 Commenti

Chris@Multibagger

3Settimana

You must also be a copy trader. 😉 I have exactly the same 3😎😂

••

Aktienfox@Aktienfox

3Settimana

@Multibagger secret access to all your trades

•

Chandra@Chandra

3Settimana

Achsenbeschriftung?

••

Aktienfox@Aktienfox

3Settimana

@Chandra on the ordinate (y-axis) return and on the abscissa (x-axis) the risk :)

••

Sahnehäubchen 🦋.@Savvy_investor_2000

3Settimana

@Aktienfox
and the scaling is based on which time periods?

••

Sahnehäubchen 🦋.@Savvy_investor_2000

3Settimana

The frontier is based on portfolio combinations, not on individual stocks. Have you simply placed a trend line over the individual risks?

••

Sahnehäubchen 🦋.@Savvy_investor_2000

3Settimana

@Savvy_investor_2000
none of this fits together. Neither the scales nor the relationships between the values.

••

Epi@Epi

3Settimana

@Savvy_investor_2000 There also needs to be a serious estimate of the position of the AGs in 1 year's time. Otherwise you only have last year's (strange) figure - and who cares about that?

•

Sahnehäubchen 🦋.@Savvy_investor_2000

3Settimana

@Epi Right, a serious estimate is good, and actually even better if the market confirms it before the year is over.

•

Sahnehäubchen 🦋.@Savvy_investor_2000

3Settimana

@Savvy_investor_2000
Last year is indeed history, and what the market is currently making of it is much more exciting.

•

Aktienfox@Aktienfox

2Settimana

@Savvy_investor_2000 the scales and relations are correct based on the monthly returns of the last five years + I have also made the portfolio combination, but I have also left an approach that refers to individual stocks

••

Sahnehäubchen 🦋.@Savvy_investor_2000

2Settimana

@Aktienfox
An efficiency line based on individual risks makes no sense. The frontier thrives on diversification. By definition, individual stocks cannot represent it.

••

Aktienfox@Aktienfox

2Settimana

@Savvy_investor_2000 you put the portfolio in relation to the individual stocks, and this also shows how individual stocks perform, only this is missing here, I will add to it

••

Sahnehäubchen 🦋.@Savvy_investor_2000

2Settimana

@Aktienfox
You are welcome to add to this. However, the main point remains that a frontier depends on diversification and the interplay of stocks and that individual stocks cannot reflect this by definition. No matter how you put them in relation to each other.

•

Mihi@Mihi

3Settimana

For what period?

••