LoginSignup
Nobody
@Nobody_123
4Mes·

Why the 120 euros at Palantir?

$PLTR (+1,3%) why the big sell-off at 120? I mean, why not at 50, 75, 100 whatever!? Anyone have any useful ideas?

8
30 Commenti
immagine del profilo
Sansebastian@Sansebastian
4Mes
Remember one thing. The decisive factor is the dollar price. The euro doesn't matter at all. Because Palantir is traded in the USA
•
29
•
immagine del profilo
gui H.@useref748d772fc84f3e
4Mes
@Sansebastian Remember one thing: the question is still justified. Your comment is of little relevance.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Sansebastian@Sansebastian
4Mes
@useref748d772fc84f3e No, because the 120 EURO don't matter at all.
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
gui H.@useref748d772fc84f3e
4Mes
@Sansebastian 😁👌🏽
••
Rbbbbb@Rbbbbb
4Mes
Let me ask you how many of you are addicted to drugs
••
Rbbbbb@Rbbbbb
4Mes
@Sansebastian ki 🤖 is not aware of himself 🤣
••
immagine del profilo
TAHT@TAHT
4Mes
Because the valuation was absolutely absurd, and people decided to limit their risk and cash out.
•
7
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@TAHT i know, but the evaluation was already absurd before..
••
Null@Frei
4Mes
The trigger was probably defense spending to be cut in the USA
•
7
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@Frei 🤔 You're right, I hadn't thought of that. Possibly... I had something more like Fibonacci retracements in mind
••
immagine del profilo
MKR_@MKR_
4Mes
@Frei shouldn't the expenditure rather be partly "redirected"? in the direction of "specialization"? and palantir&co still has massive potential there - plus worldwide projects
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Ferto@feribum
4Mes
Yes, the Pentagon should reallocate money, i.e. cut somewhere and use it elsewhere
•
1
•
Mike1990@Mike1990
4Mes
The boss wants to sell shares
•
4
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@Mike1990 I cannot disagree
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Alexxela@Alexxela
4Mes
@Mike1990 yes, but he has actually corrected the sales plan so that he wants to sell less...
•
1
•
Mike1990@Mike1990
4Mes
@Alexxela yes, but he wants to sell, and the share has also performed very well
••
immagine del profilo
Alexxela@Alexxela
4Mes
@Mike1990 may be, but this is not news, as he already wanted to sell and was reported... the reason was in my opinion the Pentagon story and possibly short-seller in view of the valuation and the price increase in 2024 alone
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
V8-Bierturbo@V8-Bierturbo
4Mes
120>100>75>50 😘
Maximum profit taking and fear of a big drop
•
3
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@V8-Bierturbo sounds logical 👏😂
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Erdbeermaus@Lumimyrsky
4Mes
had only corrected 25% at the beginning of January
•
2
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@Lumimyrsky You're right, but I'm interested in how this magic limit of 120 comes about
••
immagine del profilo
Erdbeermaus@Lumimyrsky
4Mes
@Nobody_123 pure coincidence
••
PMMVD@PMMVD
4Mes
Because the Us Gov. revised its plans … those plans that would have seen a lot of money going towards palantir.
•
2
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@PMMVD Maybe
••
immagine del profilo
Mo@BigMo
4Mes
Because the monthly chart is practically a vertical line.
Everything corrects at some point.
•
2
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@BigMo That's right, I'm just wondering why at this point in particular
••
immagine del profilo
Mo@BigMo
4Mes
@Nobody_123 It is enough if a larger investor, like many others here, thinks: "I'll take some profits".

There doesn't necessarily have to be another reason.

There has been a lot of fantasy in the share price for some time.
•
1
•
Nobody@Nobody_123
4Mes
@BigMo 🤔 maybe you're right... and it wasn't the amount at all, but a concatenation
••
immagine del profilo
Gerry@gerry361
4Mes
The Pentagon is planning budget cuts at the US Department of Defense, which is why the share price is currently correcting downwards.
•
1
•
immagine del profilo
Joris@Joris
4Mes
•
1
•
Partecipa alla conversazione
IscrivitiAccesso