8Mes·

Faketoshi Craig Wright sues Bitcoin (again) Core👨‍⚖️🤦‍♂️

Of course, his own fork $BSV (-2,2%) is the only real Bitcoin, which is why $BTC (+0,56%) is not allowed to call itself BTC.

The lawsuit simply includes 911 BILLION POUNDS🤡

After years of claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto and suing countless people who said the opposite, the next round is probably about to begin.

He lost the previous legal dispute and the claim to be Satoshi in court, which is why he has now issued a statement on his official website retracting the allegations.

https://craigwright.net/

I actually thought that was the end of it, but apparently his ego is too gekränkt🤷‍♂️

27 Commenti

Pope Donkey XXI@DonkeyInvestor

8Mes

What a buffoon 🤦. But I think the statement on the website is great

•

Utente eliminato

8Mes

Il commento è stato cancellato

Soprano@Soprano

8Mes

@Angelrai Legal obligation

••

Visualizza un'altra risposta

Soprano@Soprano

8Mes

This is an interesting development on the subject of "Is the CIA behind Bitcoin?". Are there any other people who claim to be Nakamoto? This leads back to the starting point of why the person who did it doesn't want to or can't reveal it.

Would the real Satoshi please stand up?

••

Carsten@Carsten1970

8Mes

@Soprano Because he/she doesn't want to or can't for whatever reason. Unless it comes out by chance. Similar to Banksy. If he is not caught by chance on a fresh work of art, no one will ever find out who he is. Unless he reveals your identity himself. But there's no good reason for either of them to do that :-). After all, nobody knows who posed for the Mona Lisa. And sometimes it's a good thing that something can't be proven 100%. :-)

••

Stefan21@stefan_21

8Mes

@Soprano With this vehemence, Craig Wright is certainly the only one who claims this.
I think that Satoshi - if he is still alive - would do well never to expose himself to the public.

•

Soprano@Soprano

8Mes

@stefan_21 Why is he doing a good job? A currency must also be based on trust. For some people it is irrelevant who Satoshi is in order to trust Bitcoin, for others it is not.

••

Stefan21@stefan_21

8Mes

@Soprano Bitcoin is a decentralized network and is structured in such a way that it does not require trust in other people. You can make payments without trust. Nobody sits at the top and can change anything in the network like the central bank, which was able to create every third US dollar out of nothing during corona.
In preparation for the HBO documentary, for example, there were already voices saying that Satoshi should be prosecuted for all crimes committed in connection with Bitcoin. Legitimate, of course - but only if the central banks are also punished for crimes committed with their currency wurden🤦‍♂️😂
It is completely irrelevant who Satoshi is - also because he no longer has any power over the network. Bitcoin is a democratically regulated network in which every participant has the same rights and this would not change even if Satoshi's identity were known.

•

Soprano@Soprano

8Mes

@Carsten1970 But Banksy has a good reason to remain anonymous. His graffiti is only special because it is technically illegal, not because it is somehow aesthetically outstanding. He can't simply paint his motifs on a piece of paper. It is necessary for him to remain anonymous, otherwise the whole concept would no longer work.

••

Carsten@Carsten1970

8Mes

@Soprano No, not of outstanding aesthetics, but it gets to the heart of the matter. And quite critical of the mainstream.
Yes, he does! He paints them on paper and they are auctioned off. You can also apply to buy one directly from him or his team. And if you're lucky, you'll get an original. But not a snap, of course.

And if you're lucky, you might even find a Bitcoin block.

BTC is also illegal for some institutions because it cannot be controlled.

Two illegal ones from the mainstream.
Maybe there are parallel approaches.
Nobody knows. 🤷

Greetings
Carsten.

•

Soprano@Soprano

8Mes

@stefan_21 Yes, but how do you know that? I really know all the arguments. I've already had it explained to me "you don't need to trust the people you just need to trust the code" the problem with that is I can't assess the trustworthiness of code at all. And I am then forced to trust the people who explain Bitcoin to me, that they have dealt with it enough.

Theoretically, I couldn't download any software from the internet because I can't assess how the software works. I couldn't download the Trade Republic app either, because I have no idea whether there is a possibility in the source code to take away my assets without my consent. I would also not be able to use e-mail programs because I don't know whether the source code allows my communications to be read.

Ultimately, I can only use these apps and programs BECAUSE I know the publisher. In the end, I have to trust the people again and not the code. As a layman, I have no other choice.

••

Stefan21@stefan_21

8Mes

@Soprano I understand what you mean - the magic word here is "open source". The apps and programs from the Internet are usually not open source. With them, you have to trust the manufacturer completely. With Bitcoin, anyone can (but doesn't have to) look at the code and check it for themselves. Even if you don't understand the code yourself, you can be sure that it has already been checked by countless people. Of course, you could also ask someone you trust to review the code.
However, the important thing is that nobody is able to change the code, for example to put more Bitcoin into circulation or to increase the size of the blocks. If they do, then the Bitcoin users must all agree with their nodes and install the corresponding update - otherwise nothing will happen :)

•

Pope Donkey XXI@DonkeyInvestor

8Mes

@Soprano Here I am 👋

•

Pope Donkey XXI@DonkeyInvestor

8Mes

@Soprano Code can be checked. It is not necessary to trust a person. You can't trust people. There is always a residual risk. If you trust people because you can't read code, trust a person who can read code

•

Visualizza tutti 2 ulteriori risposte

Luca@Lugga2111_05

8Mes

Hello Stefan,
which hardware wallet can you recommend for Crypro?
Lg

••

Stefan21@stefan_21

8Mes

@Lugga2111_05 For Bitcoin, I can definitely recommend the BitBox02 :)
Otherwise, it depends on what kind of cryptocurrencies you want to buy and store. The BitBox is available, for example, in the Bitcoin Only Edition and the Multi Edition. I use the Bitcoin Only Edition because it has additional security advantages - less program code means less susceptibility to errors :)

•

Luca@Lugga2111_05

8Mes

@stefan_21 Thank you for your answer. What do you think of the Trezor hardware wallets?

••

Stefan21@stefan_21

8Mes

@Lugga2111_05 Trezor is also great and I had also considered.... but then decided in favor of BitBox because I got a Bitcoin Only version and because I have the option of setting up a multisig wallet with BitBox. Trezor, on the other hand, still doesn't support this as far as I know - although this will be absolutely irrelevant for the vast majority of people. Otherwise, I don't see anything that speaks against Trezor :)

•

Luca@Lugga2111_05

8Mes

@stefan_21 Thank you very much

•

Utente eliminato

8Mes

Il commento è stato cancellato

Stefan21@stefan_21

8Mes

@Angelrai no :)

••

Utente eliminato

8Mes

Il commento è stato cancellato

Stefan21@stefan_21

8Mes

@Angelrai Even if a court rules in his favor, this changes exactly nothing for Bitcoin. That is why, or even more so, why not all miners and Bitcoiners will suddenly switch to BSV😂
The lawsuit is also lächerlich🤷‍♂️

•

Utente eliminato

8Mes

Il commento è stato cancellato

Pope Donkey XXI@DonkeyInvestor

8Mes

@Angelrai nice hobby. I recently bought a couple of private jets for fun 👍

•

Visualizza un'altra risposta