$VWCE (+1,22%)
$ALLW (+1,82%)
$FWRG (+1,3%)
$FTAW (+1,92%)

Is the difference in performance only due to the tracking difference? If so, how long should this be monitored? I actually wanted to save the $ALLW (+1,82%) because of the 0.07 TER, but if it's like that in the long term, it's not worth it.

The Xtrackers FTSE All-World UCITS ETF $ALLW (+1,82%) (ISIN: IE000L6ZMMC4) will no longer cost 0.12 percent per year in TER as before, but only 0.07 percent as of June 1. only 0.07 percent.

This makes it the cheapest ETF on the FTSE All-World Index.

The asset management company DWS is thus once again aggressively attacking the competition from Vanguard and Invesco, which it had already undercut with a TER of 0.12 percent. DWS is also competing with very low-cost providers such as Amundi and its Prime All Country World ETF.

#ftseallworld
#ftse
#Xtrackers

Source: https://www.boerse-online.de/nachrichten/fonds/ftse-all-world-hammer-anbieter-senkt-gebuehren-fuer-beliebten-welt-etf-drastisch-20401985.html

M22 Working student at $AIG (-1,18%)

Currently 350€ savings rate with

• 180€ $ALLW (+1,82%)
• 120€ $XNAS (+2,78%)
• 50€ $BTC (+2,55%)

The other positions should continue to run for the time being. If necessary, take 10-20% profit and put it into the core. Otherwise actually quite satisfied, but at the moment everything is going up anyway.

Do you think the portfolio is too aggressive or would you change something in general? The aim is to accumulate enough equity in the next 5-10 years for the down payment on a home.

Thanks in advance and have a nice weekend :)

I just discovered the new FTSE All World with a TER of 0.12 from Xtrackers today and wanted to share it here, as it was only launched at the beginning of April and some of you may not have noticed it yet.

Here on getquin it is listed with 0.15. At justETF and in the KID with 0.12. The transaction costs are usually omitted as they are variable.

$IE000L6ZMMC4 (+1,82%)