9Mes·

Simplify your portfolio?


Hi, I have been moving my main ETF from the $XDWD (-0,91%) to the $VWCE (-0,84%) MSCI.

As the market wasn't doing so well at the time, I decided to hold the MSCI for the time being until I get a bit more return.


Do you think I should let both run or should I switch the $XDWD (-0,91%) into the $VWCE (-0,84%) put it in the


Greetings and have a nice WE ❄️

attachment
3
29 Commenti

I try to keep my portfolio as simple as possible. With the low profit in XDWD, I would simply switch to the VWCE. Then it is important not to change the strategy and simply continue to save in the VWCE. That way you have everything you need.
1
immagine del profilo
Everything into the $VWCE
Time in the market beats timing the market. The FTSE has even more smaller companies in its portfolio (mid cap definition differs between FTSE and MSCI) +10% EM.
1
immagine del profilo
Why ? 😱😱😱
immagine del profilo
@Reinecke so that it is clearer
immagine del profilo
@niemalsinsolvent but wouldn't it have been clearer to just keep the old ETF? Otherwise, get out of one and put the capital into the other. It should be a 1:1 number, as they both track similar values.
immagine del profilo
@Reinecke Exactly, I had put the value of the old one into the new one - as a redeployment - but kept the old one for the time being, as it wasn't doing so well at the time...
immagine del profilo
@niemalsinsolvent But this is not a good criterion. The worse the old one is doing, the more favorable the reallocation is from a tax perspective. And you are aware of the correlation, i.e. if the old one rises again, the new one will rise anyway.
1
immagine del profilo
In my opinion, you can run both. If you save with a savings plan, the price won't change.
immagine del profilo
Let them both run
Utente eliminato
9Mes
Il commento è stato cancellato
immagine del profilo
@Seebi Why counterproductive? I don't see a problem.
4
immagine del profilo
@Michi8 I don't see one either. It's latte
2
Utente eliminato
9Mes
Il commento è stato cancellato
@Seebi TER is a percentage.

Whether you have 2x €50,000 at 0.2% each or
1x €100,000 at 0.2% doesn't matter 😉.

There is nothing wrong with having both MSCI & FTSE.
3
Utente eliminato
9Mes
Il commento è stato cancellato
Utente eliminato
9Mes
Il commento è stato cancellato
immagine del profilo
@Seebi It is a shift from one to the other, they should not run in parallel.
@Seebi Actually, he did. He first saved in the FTSE, i.e. with emerging markets.
Due to the performance and his own requirements, he is no longer satisfied with this and is saving in the MSCI (i.e. without emerging markets).

Simply leave the old ETF where it is, otherwise #Steuern = less capital = destruction of interest.

In addition, he can avoid the FIFO principle (i.e. sell the most recent shares first => lowest profit => lowest tax burden) when deconsolidating later.

I have it the same way.

First saved in the FTSE, but have now switched to the MSCI. Let's see later, maybe everything, so ACWII. 😉
2
@Seebi If he also thinks that NASDAQ is doing better than the world ETF, then he can of course add that.

But then you have a higher cluster risk. With the world ETF, you are simply satisfied with the average market return.

He has to decide that for himself. I don't know the future either, which will be better in 30 years' time.
@niemalsinsolvent Then switch if you think you don't want any emerging markets.

There's no point in waiting until there's more return. Both will perform very similarly.

Just note: profits => tax => less capital than if you just leave the old ETF in place
Visualizza tutti 12 ulteriori risposte
Partecipa alla conversazione