11Mes
What makes you believe in them?
••
@fcsp the future. They earn enough money to pay divinde.
My strategy is to find undervalued companies and buy them at a good price and then take the divinde.
Think of it like this:
You buy an apartment, renovate it, but you don't know how long the tenant will stay in the apartment, but you collect the rent ;-)
My strategy is to find undervalued companies and buy them at a good price and then take the divinde.
Think of it like this:
You buy an apartment, renovate it, but you don't know how long the tenant will stay in the apartment, but you collect the rent ;-)
••
@SwissKnife You should not look at dividends separately from the share price:
Dividends are completely negligible, as they are value-neutral.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dividendirrelevance.asp
The money that is paid out to you is lost by the company and reduces the share price. (dividend discount)
Behavioral finance has established that many market participants believe they are getting something extra, associate dividends with security or similar.
Many market participants prefer dividends over share buybacks even if they are in a worse tax position.
This cognitive bias is also referred to in the specialist literature as The Dividend Fallacy.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4282061-dividend-fallacy
Dividends are completely negligible, as they are value-neutral.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dividendirrelevance.asp
The money that is paid out to you is lost by the company and reduces the share price. (dividend discount)
Behavioral finance has established that many market participants believe they are getting something extra, associate dividends with security or similar.
Many market participants prefer dividends over share buybacks even if they are in a worse tax position.
This cognitive bias is also referred to in the specialist literature as The Dividend Fallacy.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4282061-dividend-fallacy
••
@PowerWordChill I would like to start here again. I will hold the company for at least 5 years, nobody knows whether the company will exist by then.
I will achieve a good return on my investment in 5 years, even if the company does not grow or grows minimally.
I will achieve a good return on my investment in 5 years, even if the company does not grow or grows minimally.
••
11Mes
@SwissKnifethat doesn't answer my question. The course is a disaster. What makes you think that will change? They are (still) growing in the B2B sector - lack of specialists. But the B2C sector is shrinking because XING is dead. Many are canceling the Premium area and switching to LinkedIn. As the number of (Premium) users in the B2C sector will continue to fall (my prediction), XING will also become less and less attractive in the B2B sector. I see 0 long-term potential in this company. The dividends won't do you any good either. After all, investors have to believe in a company. I don't know anyone who thinks XING is better than LinkedIn.
••
@fcsp I agree with you, but it's growing ;-) I know some companies that only advertise on XING, because LinkedIn is just full of garbage. XING makes the candidates from the roof area attractive and is cheaper and more effective with the ad from my own experience from the Swiss market area.
We searched on XING and LinkedIn and found the right person on XING. There were a lot of people on LinkedIn, but not the right ones either ;-)
We searched on XING and LinkedIn and found the right person on XING. There were a lot of people on LinkedIn, but not the right ones either ;-)
•
11
•