LoginSignup
immagine del profilo
Kevin E.@KevinE
6Mes
It's best to link both, then you can compare them properly. First enter a dollar sign and then select the product $IWDA (e.g.).
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
Jamie-Lee R.@investmentmaus
6Mes
@KevinC done
•
2
•
immagine del profilo
Jamie-Lee R.@investmentmaus
6Mes
@KevinC Which etf would be suitable as a further etf for the first one (IE00B4L5Y983)? I read here that you should pay attention to the weighting (countries, sectors, etc.)
••
immagine del profilo
Kevin E.@KevinE
6Mes
@investmentmaus the replication method differs. With optimized sampling, not all companies are bought into the ETF. Instead of 1,600 that are in the "normal" MSCI World, some companies that would have a 0.0x% share are not bought. This saves the ETF transaction costs. It can pass these on to the ETF customer, for example, through a lower TER (not the case here, as both = 0.12%).

I would bet that the two ETFs will run in parallel 99.9% of the time. Maybe one will be 1-2% ahead after 20 years. But we don't know for sure which one -> hardly any difference.
•
1
•