4Anno·

@Kundenservice I think the country distribution is not quite right, is it?

2
9 Commenti

immagine del profilo
Yes, it looks a bit strange.😅 We'll pass it on to our colleagues for correction.
•
3
•
immagine del profilo
@Ch_ris I'm sorry to hear that :) I'll ask again and I think I can give you an answer by Monday :-) I'll have to find out exactly where the problem lies
••
Utente eliminato
3Anno
Il commento è stato cancellato
immagine del profilo
@California_Dreamin The data is corrected and apparently replaced again with the next database update, as it is assumed that our provider always has the most up-to-date data.

We'll have to see what we can do about this.
••
@Kundenservice hello getquin team. This ETF seems to be still pulling wrong data for you guys. Please correct this as this is also breaking our country allocation of our portfolios....
••
@Kundenservice So neither the country breakdown nor the top positions are displayed correctly (at least for me)...
••
immagine del profilo
@user64efa7b981de47e2 @Ilu92
We have overlooked something crucial:

Synthetic replication, so the swaps are mapped and not the theoretical index.
The issuer presents it in exactly the same way on its website.

After all, a synthetic ETF uses swaps to try to replicate the index return rather than buying the index itself.

https://www.amundietf.de/de/privatanleger/products/equity/amundi-msci-emerging-markets-ucits-etf-eur-c/lu1681045370
••
Visualizza un'altra risposta
Nevertheless, the items of the actual index must appear here - after all, the performance, risk and country distribution are based on this. Amundi, for example, also lists the top 10 on its website, starting with TSMC at 7.47%, Samsung at 3.93%, etc. - As an investor, I am more or less indifferent to how the fund reflects the return - what counts for me is the index.
••
Nothing happened, did it?
••
Partecipa alla conversazione