1Sem.·

Adjustment of share split

When is the share split expected to be adjusted at $8001 (+1,85 %) ? I am still 94% in the red because the entire portfolio is currently "no longer available".

8 Commentaires

Ella M.@DividendenWaschbaer

1Sem.

So everything works for me.
Go to your last purchase transaction, open it, don't change anything and save it again directly. This then updates the entire position again and retrieves the split from the database.
At the latest then it should fit.

However, I don't quite understand what is meant by "stock no longer available". You should have more shares due to the split.

•

Daniel@Animizio

1Sem.

The stock is displayed in my list with a 94% minus. If I go to the details, I no longer see any stock. As if I had no shares in my securities account.

••

Ella M.@DividendenWaschbaer

1Sem.

@Animizio then take a look at the transaction list. There must be something there. A sale or something.

••

Daniel@Animizio

1Sem.

Yes, sales is in there, purchasing too. But the data is completely wrong, although the automatic connection is set up.

••

Ella M.@DividendenWaschbaer

1Sem.

@Animizio Then you may have pressed Update too early. If getquin already has the split active in the system, but the broker does not, then it may be that both are running and then it doesn't fit.
I would simply delete the transactions from the last few days and import them again. If that doesn't help, then contact support with screenshots of the broker and getquin.

••

C_Montgomery_Burns@C_Montgomery_Burns

1Sem.

Everything is now correct for me: number, buy-in, etc. However, I also deleted the connection to the portfolio and read it in again after the data was initially completely wrong.

•

Julian@MoneyISnotREAL

1Sem.

Everything fits for me without having done anything.

•

Feuerteufel90@Feuerteufel90

1Sem.

I have the same problem. The value of the shares held is now correct. But I no longer see the "Portfolio" button for the share. Statistics at the end of the year and currently are also completely wrong. Was partly 180000% in the plus then again in the minus.

•