3J·

Tech weighting

The tech share here on Getquin is given as 34.23%. Other sources such as Vanguard , speak of 31% , justetf speaks of around 26.68% tech share. What is correct and why these differences? If Getquin is calculating with incorrect values, this is of little use to me for diversification. Does anyone know? lg Ghosty

10 Commentaires

Staatsmann@Staatsmann

You also have to keep in mind that not all tech is the same when different classification systems are used.

ICB, GICS, TRBC, RBICS etc. are all different standards that represent the same ETF differently, because there is not ONE standard for classification that everyone uses.

In other words, even if the fundamental securities in the ETF match the issuer, the allocation does not have to match the issuer.

That's why you should look for a "single source of truth" that classifies everything according to uniform systems.
If Amundi uses ICB, iShares GICS and Vangurd TRBC on its own website, then you have three different data standards to compare.

•

Ghosty7@Ghosty7

@Staatsmann Oh, thanks for the explanation.

••

K@TechNav

Getquin x-ray data is often not up-to-date

•

Global I.@gloinvest

Please bear in mind that the sector weighting of a marketcap etf changes with every price set. A daily updated evaluation is unrealistic.

•

Ghosty7@Ghosty7

@gloinvest My idea would be to rebalance my portfolio once a year in the event of major deviations in sectors and regions

••

Global I.@gloinvest

@Ghosty7 warum?

••

Ghosty7@Ghosty7

@gloinvest Because over the years my portfolio could move away from my target weighting/strategy

••

Global I.@gloinvest

@Ghosty7 then a market cap ETF is the completely wrong choice. It has a dynamic weighting - so you would permanently trigger tax-relevant events in order to achieve your "target weighting".

••

Ghosty7@Ghosty7

Do you know how much delay to expect? Days, weeks, months?

••

Ghosty7@Ghosty7

Or can Getquin not be used for annual rebalancing of individual ETFs by region, sector, etc.?

••