2J·

Zoetis—A Countercyclical Opportunity or a Crisis?

Hi, some of you have already drawn some attention to the stock of $ZTS (-0,46 %) .

attachment

Profile:

$ZTS (-0,46 %) is a global animal health company. In 2013, it was $PFE (-0,2 %) and has been independent ever since.

The company’s focus is entirely on the animal health sector—this is where it generates its revenue through the development, manufacture, and distribution of pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, vaccines, and genetic tests.

Strictly speaking, the Animal Health division is divided into the companion animal segment—such as dogs, cats, etc.—and the livestock segment—such as cattle, sheep, and similar animals.

Zoetis generates about 70% of its revenue from the companion animal market.

This is important because, unlike the livestock market, the pet market exhibits higher growth momentum due to the humanization of pets —Private individuals are more willing to buy medications here when their pet is unwell than a farmer who has more than 2,500 head of cattle and is struggling with regulations, meat prices, and so on.


Risk: But there is also a high risk here—due to the humanization of pets, a company and its products can lose customer trust more quickly and permanently if they do not help or, worse yet, lead to complications. And this is exactly what is alleged to have happened with Zoetis’s medications!


Zoetis has faced strong criticism for failing to provide sufficient warnings about the side effects of Librela and Solensia. These side effects reportedly led, in some cases, to severe side effects in the animals. Furthermore, shareholders have filed lawsuits because management communicated the loss of market share too late and not thoroughly enough. In addition, the world’s leading regulatory agencies (the FDA and EMA) have tightened their oversight—anyone familiar with the pharmaceutical sector knows that this signals trouble.


The consequences are clearly felt—veterinarians are prescribing the affected medications much more cautiously, which is hindering growth and benefiting competitors such as $ELAN (-2,81 %) , $MRK (-1,33 %) and Boehringer Ingelheim.

Compounding these problems is persistent inflation, which means that consumers can no longer afford—or are unwilling to pay for—expensive premium drugs and are turning to cheaper generics.


Opportunity/Risk:

Zoetis remains an absolute heavyweight in the animal health industry and the undisputed number one.

In the past, the company has not only outperformed the MSCI World but has even outperformed the Nasdaq at times.

In a long-term comparison, however, the stock price is currently even below the growth rate of the Euro Stoxx 50. This is also reflected in the P/E ratio—where a value of 30–35 used to be the norm for years, it now stands at 12, making it an absolute outlier. At the same time, Zoetis’s other business operations are actually very robust. Zoetis’s payout ratio currently stands at about 33%, which means the company still has more than enough cash available for research, dividend increases, and potential reserves for lost lawsuits.


One factor, however, weighs heavily—the loss of customer trust!

This is one of the most critical issues in the pharmaceutical sector that can become a long-term problem.

Consider, for instance, the stories surrounding Purdue Pharma (the OxyContin scandal), Mallinckrodt & Endo International, $BAYN (-1,01 %) (the glyphosate/Monsanto acquisition or the Lipobay scandal), $MRK (-1,33 %) (the Vioxx scandal), and worst of all: Thomae with its product Contergan.

Although these examples come from human medicine, I would like to remind you once again of the humanization of pets and the share of Zoetis’s revenue that this market represents.


Conclusion:

A current investment in Zoetis is weighed down by many potential future problems, but could also pay off due to the enormous discount if $ZTS (-0,46 %) it can ward off the lawsuits and manage to regain the trust of shareholders and, above all, customers. A turnaround bet, so to speak.


Note:

I am not personally invested in this stock and do not intend to be—but that’s more because I’m currently quite satisfied with how my portfolio looks than for any of the reasons mentioned above.


Yours, FinanzMechanik

10
9 Commentaires

image de profil
Well, I like these dividends just as much as our dog 🐕 likes Rimadyl.
I only have 100 shares, but I'm comfortable with that and am looking forward to a nice increase in the dividend…
6
image de profil
2
image de profil
I'm currently in the middle of a trade.
1
image de profil
@jkb92 I wish you the best of luck with that! 😊
1
image de profil
@FinanzMechaNikk Thanks. I'm optimistic in the short to medium term. Some U.S. politicians have also bought shares. Among them is someone who oversees the FDA.
1
image de profil
@jkb92 Well, you’re right about that—I’ve found FDA inspectors to be very professional so far. If you can’t immediately provide all the required documents or explain things, their friendliness quickly goes out the window. The FDA is one of the strictest regulatory agencies in the world, and an FDA license or approval is essentially the gateway to various other countries that trust the FDA’s judgment.

Of course, it always matters what the inspectors’ superiors have to say as well 😅—or to put it another way... There isn’t always consensus between science (the inspector) and politics (the agency’s appointed political overseer). As a rule, however, they follow the recommendations of their officials.

The future will essentially show how it all turns out 😄💰💥
1
image de profil
I sold in May at around €75 after having tried a few times before to take advantage of the falling prices to build up my position further, but the price wouldn’t bottom out, and the current price confirms my decision. Especially since metrics like the P/E ratio and dividend yield weren’t great back then either.
You don’t have to be in every trade, and a loss of nearly 50% (at the time) is enough for me to pull the plug when things aren’t going as hoped.
1
image de profil
@Droid Absolutely sound decision. I think your last paragraph really hits the nail on the head—it contains a lot of truth 😄👍

I’ve found myself often enough that you really have to be able to afford turnaround candidates like $ZTS, $NOVO B, $BAYN, $BAS, $NKE, and many more. My personal experience so far has often been that I’ve paid high opportunity costs, and the capital invested would have yielded better returns in, say, a global ETF 📈

Spoiler alert: I’m still invested in Nike and LVMH anyway 😆
image de profil
@FinanzMechaNikk I generally like turnaround stocks, too— $NOVO B, $BAS, and others are still in my portfolio and have managed to rebound slightly from their lows, or at least put the period of heavy losses behind them—but as long as the price keeps falling, it’s better off in someone else’s portfolio 🐵
1
Participez à la conversation