The more advertisers join and use Pixels, the more data $META can collect about its users, improving ad relevance and monetization. The platform's superior returns in turn drive more advertisers to use it and the cycle continues.
META currently trades at 22x forward earnings despite double-digit bottom-line growth expectations in 2024-2026.
𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬 (𝟏)
That will probably make a series about posts that upset me, have an emotional impact on the viewer, which means traffic among the posts for the content creator and false purchase prerequisites for the viewer.
Basically on emotional stats:
https://app.getquin.com/activity/GDlzIDdeHe?lang=de&utm_source=sharing
Post:
𝑨𝒃𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒛𝒆𝒍𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝑨𝒌𝒕𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝒛𝒖𝒎 𝑨𝑻𝑯 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒍𝒆𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒏
From a statistical point of view, this is then approximately the level of "physical pain"
When investing in individual stocks, the result, in whatever period, basically fluctuates between -100% and +X%. There are shares that have never returned to the price for which they were listed on the stock exchange. There are companies that do well for 10 years, then still go bust.
In addition, the valuation depends on macro events (e.g. the prime rate).
So what makes no sense at all? Expressing the difference to the ATH in percent and comparing it to other temporary losers. It suggests to the viewer which stocks are "cheap" at the moment, which then appeals to him emotionally ("That's actually a good company, if it's so cheap at the moment it's bound to go down again soon.").
One could compare companies from one industry based on many things. Perhaps the company was the focus of investors at the time of the ATH, but has not been able to present any growth since then? Perhaps the industry's future prospects have worsened? What is the valuation? Cash flow? Business model? Earnings revenue growth?
But no. BaYeR iS 60% oF AtH eNtFeRnT aNd VW nUr 45
Not even a substantive comparison with other companies from such different industries would make sense.
(Funnily enough, the same finfluencers still hold the opinion that buying individual stocks at the ATH makes total sense, which means that a buy recommendation based on distances from the ATH should be complete bullshit even according to their own interpretation).
🤡It is best to provide the whole thing with comments such as "bought", so that it really looks for every beginner as if you prefer these shares, because they have such a distance to the ATH. That these particular shares are bought for completely different reasons is logical, but does not arise from these posts.
🤡🤡Then of course write under it "No investment advice", may legally work halfway, but is moral trash. Stock market newcomers see the post, maybe even research the company, but can understand a valuation as good as not, HOWEVER.
[if you have seen trashposts put them in the comments]
