With the current minimum wage, the payout corresponds to around 28 working hours.
Such distributions help me to build up long-term wealth. The amount is reinvested in the S&P500 ETF.
Postes
27Technological advances and global challenges are opening up new opportunities in various sectors. In addition to well-known areas such as artificial intelligence and renewable energies, there are less recognized sectors with significant growth potential. Here are some areas where I see a lot of potential.
For each area, I have listed a few stocks that are considered pioneers or already established...
1. 💧 Water management - the blue gold of the future
Why is it exciting?
- Water scarcity is becoming a pressing problem worldwide.
- Investments in water treatment, desalination and efficient use are increasing.
Example company:
- Xylem Inc. $X1YL34 - Specialized in water technologies and solutions.
- Veolia Environnement $VIE (-0,59 %) - Leader in water and waste management.
2. 💻 Data processing & data centers - backbone of the digital era
Why is it exciting?
- Increasing data volumes require powerful infrastructures.
- Cloud computing, edge computing and quantum computing are revolutionizing the industry.
Example companies:
- Equinix $EQIX (+0,04 %) - The world's leading provider of data center services.
- Digital Realty $DLR (-0,42 %) - Specializes in data center solutions for companies.
3. 🚀 Space industry - The new economic space
Why is it exciting?
- Private companies are driving innovation and reducing costs.
- Applications range from satellite communication to space tourism.
Example companies:
- Virgin Galactic Holdings Inc. $SPCE (+6,72 %) (SPCE) - pioneer in the field of space tourism.
- Rocket Lab USA Inc. $RKLB (-0,23 %) (RKLB) - provider of low-cost rocket launches for small satellites.
- Airbus $AIR (+0,08 %) (AIR) - Leader in aerospace technologies.
- Boeing Co. $BA (-1,04 %) (BA) - Involved in manned space programs and satellite technology.
- Northrop Grumman Corp. $NOC (-1,15 %) (NOC) - Specializes in defense and space systems.
4. 🌍 Rare earths & raw materials - foundation of modern technologies
Why are they exciting?
- Electromobility, renewable energies and electronics rely on rare metals.
- Recycling and sustainable mining are becoming increasingly important.
Example company:
- MP Materials $MP (+4,84 %) - Largest producer of rare earths in the USA.
- Lynas Rare Earths $LYSDY (+2,26 %) - Leading supplier outside China.
5. 🌱 Vertical farming - the future of urban food production
Why is it exciting?
- Population growth and urbanization require new farming methods.
- Indoor farming enables year-round production with reduced water consumption.
Example company:
- AeroFarms (not found on getquin) - pioneer in vertical farming with innovative cultivation techniques.
- AppHarvest $APPHQ - Operates high-tech greenhouses for sustainable cultivation.
💡 Conclusion: These emerging sectors offer significant opportunities for investors and innovators. Early involvement could be advantageous in the long term.
🔥 Which of these future industries do you think are particularly promising? Share your opinion in the comments!
✅ I'll list the companies mentioned in the comments here:
$LRV (+3,62 %) (rare earths)
$TTEK (+0,62 %) (water management)
$BMI (-0,8 %) (water management)
$TSLA (+2,84 %) (Robotics)
🔍 Disclaimer: No investment advice - only my personal assessment. Everyone should do their own research!
Graphic: AI generated
The rapid development of AI has triggered a veritable boom in data centers. Companies such as OpenAI and DeepSeek are driving this revolution and the demand for high-performance servers is growing exponentially.
However, the increase in computing power is also accompanied by massive energy consumption, an issue that is leading to global discussions about infrastructure, efficiency and future investments [1].
At the same time, the question arises as to whether there is currently an overinvestment in computing power. The Chinese AI company DeepSeek, for example, has presented a model that works more efficiently than previous large language models (LLMs).
Does this mean that we will soon need less computing power?
Or will the Jevons paradox occur instead, i.e. the effect that more efficient technologies actually increase overall consumption in the long term? [2, 3]
In this article, I will focus on the key developments in the data center sector, the growing demand for energy, regional characteristics, current challenges and potential investment opportunities.
As always, the article is intended to shed light on the background to current events, provide food for thought and give impetus. The stocks mentioned do not, of course, constitute investment advice.
🤖 Data centers: the foundation of the AI revolution
The growing global demand for AI-supported software and digital applications requires powerful data centers. Goldman Sachs analysts forecast that the global demand for power from data centers will increase by 50% by 2027 and by up to 165 % could increase [1].
This chart below forecasts the energy consumption of data centers (in terawatt hours) by 2030, distinguishing between AI- and non-AI-based applications in the US and the rest of the world. Total consumption is expected to rise to over 1,000 TWh by 2030 [4].
Our analysts expect data center power consumption to increase by more than 160% by 2030
Source: [4], primary: Masanet et al. (2020), Cisco, IEA, Goldman Sachs Research
This data shows how AI applications will massively increase energy consumption. The rapid increase in the area of "US AI" and "Rest of world AI" is particularly striking.
The three main reasons for this increase are
New models such as GPT-5 or DeepSeek AI require more and more computing power. Training and operating these models requires trillions of calculations [1].
Companies are integrating AI into numerous applications: from search engines to personalized financial and healthcare services.
As digitalization progresses, the global demand for data storage and cloud services is increasing [1].
Which companies dominate the market?
On the demand side for data centers, large hyperscale cloud providers and other companies are building large language models (LLMs) that are capable of processing and understanding natural language. These models need to be trained on huge amounts of information using power-intensive processors [4].
On the supply side, hyperscale cloud companies, data center operators and asset managers are deploying large amounts of capital to build new high-capacity data centers.
These include, among others:
In addition, specialized data center providers such as Equinix $EQIX (+0,04 %) and Digital Realty $DLR (-0,42 %) as they supply physical infrastructure to the hyperscalers [6].
According to Goldman Sachs Research, demand for data center infrastructure will increasingly outstrip supply in the coming years.
The utilization rate of existing data centers is expected to rise from around 85% in 2023 to more than 95% by the end of 2026. However, the situation is expected to ease from 2027 onwards as new data centers are commissioned and demand growth driven by AI slows down (see chart below) [1].
Goldman Sachs currently estimates that the global power consumption of the data center market is around 55 gigawatts (GW). This is made up of cloud computing workloads (54%), traditional workloads such as email or data storage (32%) and AI (14%) [1].
For the future, analysts predict that electricity demand will increase to 84 GW by 2027. The share of AI is expected to grow to 27%, while the cloud share will fall to 50% and traditional workloads to 23% [1].
By the end of 2030, around 122 gigawatts (GW) of data center capacity will be online.
At this point, I asked myself as a layman how the units mentioned so far are to be understood, in my first graphic I speak of 1,000 TWh of energy consumption of all data centers by 2030 and now here is talk of 122 GW of data center capacity? In order not to go completely beyond the scope of the article, I have added a section at the very end in case some of you also feel like a layman and want to put the "units" into perspective.
... and now on with the article...
One central problem remains:
Where does all the energy come from?
⚡️Energieversorgung: Can the grid keep up?
According to estimates by Goldman Sachs, more than 720 billion US dollars will have to be invested in expanding the power grid worldwide by 2030 in order to supply the new data centers with sufficient energy [1].
Europe in particular, where electricity consumption was expected to decline for many years, is experiencing a veritable "demand shock" [1].
Which energy sources supply data centers?
Natural gas is seen as a realistic short-term solution to meet continuous demand. It serves as a bridging technology until renewable energy and storage solutions are further developed, as renewable energy is not available around the clock [4].
Wind and solar energy could cover around 80 % of demand in the long term, provided that sufficient storage solutions are integrated [4].
In practice, solar plants run on average only about 6 hours per day, while wind power plants run on average 9 hours per day. There is also a daily volatility in the capacity of these sources, depending on the radiation of the sun and the strength of the wind [4].
The graph shows the fluctuations in capacity factors for wind and solar energy in the USA in 2023. The capacity factor indicates how efficiently an energy source utilizes its maximum output throughout the year.
The graph illustrates that wind and solar energy can complement each other seasonally: While wind is more efficient in winter, solar energy provides the highest yields in summer. This shows how important a balanced energy mix is to ensure security of supply.
In addition to finding environmentally friendly energy sources to power data centers, technology providers can reduce emissions intensity through efficiency gains.
The following chart shows the development of the workload and energy consumption of data centers between 2015 and 2023. Although the workload almost tripled, energy consumption remained almost constant until 2019 thanks to efficiency gains. The efficiency gains then slowed down from 2020 onwards.
Source: [4], primary: Masanet et al. (2020), IEA, Cisco, Goldman Sachs Research
This chart supports the discussion on the Jevons paradox (see below). Efficiency gains could be offset or even exceeded in the long term by higher workloads and AI demand. This highlights the need to make data center energy sources more sustainable.
Meanwhile, governments are also becoming more supportive of nuclear energy on the whole. Switzerland is reconsidering the use of nuclear generators for its electricity supply, while nuclear energy enjoys bipartisan support in the US and the Australian opposition party has put forward plans to introduce nuclear reactors [4].
Participants at the COP28 conference at the end of 2023, an annual summit convened by the United Nations to combat climate change, agreed to triple global nuclear capacity by 2050 [4].
Nuclear energy is considered the ideal option for basic power supply as it provides a reliable and constant supply of energy.
As a result, more and more large tech companies such as Alphabet, Amazon and Microsoft are turning to small modular nuclear power plants (SMRs).
📊 Increasing efficiency & the Jevons paradox
With new technologies such as DeepSeek, AI could work more efficiently in the future. But does greater efficiency automatically mean that less computing power is required?
The Jevons paradox: More efficiency = more consumption?
The Jevons paradox describes the fact that increases in efficiency often do not lead to lower consumption, but to higher consumption overall.
-Example:
In the 19th century, more efficient steam engines did not lead to lower coal consumption; on the contrary, as the machines became cheaper and more versatile, coal consumption actually increased.
With cars: more fuel-efficient engines did not lead to less gasoline consumption, but to people driving more cars.
-Applied to AI:
As AI models become more efficient, the cost per computation decreases. This makes AI applications attractive in even more areas, which in turn leads to a higher overall demand for computing power.
🌎 Regional distribution and global expansion of data center infrastructure
Current distribution: Where are the data centers located today?
Today, most data centers are located in the Asia-Pacific region and North America. Well-known locations are:
North America:
- Northern Virginia
- San Francisco Bay Area
Asia: Beijing
- Beijing
- Shanghai
These regions are characterized by high computing power, intensive data traffic and strong demand from corporate campuses [1].
The chart also shows the historical development of data center capacity by region (North America, APAC, etc.) from 2017 to 2024. The figures illustrate how fast the infrastructure for the AI revolution is growing and underlines why the energy requirements of data centers are increasing so rapidly.
The increase in capacity from around 20 GW in 2017 to almost 60 GW in 2024 shows an enormous growth trend. This correlates directly with the increasing demand for AI applications and cloud computing.
How is supply growing?
Goldman Sachs Research estimates that global data center capacity will increase to around 122 GW by the end of 2030, as mentioned above. The share of hyperscalers and specialized operators will increase from the current 60% to around 70% [1].
The largest expansion of data centers has been recorded here in the past ten years.
The largest expansion of new data centers is planned in North America over the next five years.
📈 Investment opportunities: Some winners of the AI and data center revolution
US shares e.g.:
European stocks e.g.:
Japanese stocks e.g:
🧠 Conclusion: AI, data centers & energy as the trend of the century?
Although some analysts warn of possible overinvestment, the figures indicate that the demand for computing power and energy for AI data centers will continue to rise sharply.
The biggest winners are therefore:
In the long term, these companies could be among the biggest beneficiaries of the coming decades.
👨🏽💻 How do I position myself?
Personally, I think I am well positioned with the NASDAQ 100 $CSNDX (-0,32 %) (portfolio share of 23%), as the focus is on US technology and growth stocks. The ETF complements my All-World with a stronger weighting in innovative sectors such as AI and cloud computing.
In the near future, I will also take a closer look at Daikin Industrie $6367 (-0,64 %) share in order to increase the exposure to Japan and the share price offers an entry point at first glance.
In addition, AMD $AMD (-2,28 %) has also caught my attention, the reason being its positioning in the aforementioned interference market. Most of the capital is currently flowing into the expansion of new AI models. However, as soon as these become a "commodity" and everyone uses them, most of the capital will probably flow into the interference market (market for the application of AI models).
Furthermore, I have Siemens AG $SIE (-0,86 %) with approx. 2.3% portfolio share (still growing to approx. 4%), which I also see as well positioned for the future for the following reasons (in the context of the article):
Network stability
Data center control
Efficient building structure
Not directly cooling systems, but:
What is your opinion❓
Thanks for reading! 🤝
...Said digression follows after the sources...
__________
Sources:
[2] "The Coal Question"
http://digamo.free.fr/peart96.pdf
[3] https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons-Paradoxon
[5] https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai
[6] https://www.cbre.com/insights/reports/global-data-center-trends-2024
__________
🧭 Digression: on gigawatts and terawatt hours
In order to understand the relationship between the two figures, 122 GW (gigawatts) and 1,000 TWh (terawatt hours), it is important to clarify the units and their meaning:
Refers to the current average power capacity that data centers worldwide require to function. Power (measured in GW) describes the amount of energy consumed per second. This is therefore a snapshot of energy requirements.
This is an indication of energy consumption over a certain period of time, in this case one year. It describes how much energy is required in total in 12 months.
The forecast of 1,000 TWh is slightly below the value resulting from the calculation. The graph shows values slightly above 1,000 TWh; according to the calculation based on 122 GW of power capacity, energy consumption should be around 1,069 TWh.
Nevertheless, general reasons for deviations may be as follows:
This shows how much the demand for data centers and energy will increase due to AI and digitalization by 2030
__________
+ 2
It's a pity that my cryptos are not included here. Nevertheless, I think my shares have performed very well.
My strongest drivers were $TSLA (+2,84 %)
$MSTR (-6,26 %) and $NVDA (-0,68 %)
Which stocks did you buy in 2024 to profit from in 2025?
My bets are $DLR (-0,42 %)
$HODL (-1,18 %) and the big cloud providers $MSFT (-0,62 %)
$AMZN (+0,54 %) and $GOOG (+0,36 %)
Hello everyone,
today there is a long announced #offtopic from me.
It's about the question of what the planned reinvestment of my distributions is that I mentioned (especially in the reviews).
I want passive cash flow! I want the money to rain down from the sky, fully automated! And this money should also find its way back to the stock market fully automatically. Simply to keep feeding the passive income stream so that it gets bigger and stronger. This should work until one day I use the distributions to cover my living costs.
But how do I go about it?
In order to know how much I can reinvest each month at best, I first need to record all my incoming distributions, from which I can then calculate an average value for all monthly distributions per month. I compare this value with the previous year's values. This comparison enables me to obtain the increase in my income and thus estimate it for the new calendar year. The monthly return figure estimated here for the following calendar year is my planned reinvestment figure.
As I said before, I want to set up a fully automated system with the reinvestment that runs by itself. This also means that manual intervention on my part should not be necessary, although there may be exceptions.
So the question is: when do I actually have to intervene in the automated reinvestment of my distributions myself? Of course, this is only the case if the actual distributions received from my investments in a month are lower than the planned amount of my reinvestment. And for this scenario, I have two aces up my sleeve to avoid having to intervene after all. On the one hand, I leave distributions from particularly high-yield months for the weaker months so that the process can continue. If these reserves are not sufficient, I have a second ace up my sleeve. My current employer gives me half of the Germany ticket tax-free. I haven't included this bonus in my personal budget planning. This means that the money is not intended to cover expenses. So if there isn't enough available for the planned reinvestment, I'll use this allowance for that. And in the event that the allowance cannot be used, it goes into a provision for reinvestment.
The system I use is not complicated and has fortunately already proven itself in practice. Looking back on the first three quarters of 2024, my distributions were always large enough for everything to work fully automatically, except in January and February. For the two months affected, I was able to keep the engine running thanks to the provision. It's running like clockwork. Things are also looking good for October. So not only is the system running, I could even have planned more optimistically.
The follow-up question is certainly: how do I use my reinvestments, or more precisely: what do I invest my distributions in? There are two strategies that I pursue. On the one hand, I use the distributions to strengthen the savings plans from the net salary of my smaller-volume positions so that the positions can build up more quickly. On the other hand, I use some of the reinvestments to finance entire savings plans that I don't have to use my net salary for. This is the case for me, for example, with oil stocks such as $XOM (-3,86 %) and $CVX (-1,13 %) but also with others such as $DLR (-0,42 %) and $GSK is the case.
Conclusion: The system works as described and is simple. I only have to check a few days before executing the savings plans to see whether the clearing accounts are sufficiently filled. I can even increase the size of the planned reinvestments for the following year, which makes me very happy. $UPS (-0,64 %) and $HTGC (-0,42 %) will be included in the savings plans, starting this December. The snowball of passive income is thus getting bigger and bigger, making me increasingly free from active earned income. That makes me happy! I couldn't have imagined something like this at the zero hour of my wealth accumulation.
Hello everyone.
I started investing around 2017/2018, initially into common funds, just last few years into stocks and etfs.
Most transactions are not correctly registered time-wise as they some positions were bought in more transactions or too much time ago.
The portfolio is mainly exposed to wards the US market and the target is to keep adding/adding to dividend growth companies and keep a reasonable diversification even if that might imply lower growth.
Possible future additions (also depending on overlaps with the etfs and common fund):
$MA (-0,44 %)
$MCD (-1,25 %)
$MSFT (-0,62 %)
$JPM (+0,32 %)
$DLR (-0,42 %)
$CHD (-0,75 %)
Also will add more to the world common fund and both etfs.
Any recommendations on what I should be looking into?
PS: I am aware about $INTC (+1,23 %) being the odd one of the bunch, I am mostly interested in seeing what will happen to it in over an even longer time scenario.
Hi community,
I've been active here for just about a month, and started my investing journey on January.
Since I'm quite new to the investing world, I would like to have some feedback on my portfolio, and discuss my strategy and future plans too.
I read and learn a lot from you, especially the evergreens :)
I think it'll be a little bit of a read, but I'm writing this also as a reminder to my future self, in case I lose focus somewhere down the line :)
So, I'll start from me, my goals, strategy and then go into the reasoning behind the positions and then into plans.
About me
Almost 28, F, software developer. Own a small apartment bought and renovated in 2020-2021 with really really good mortgage rate and tax reimbursements in an city with a rich university presence .
This I bought and renovated as future asset (lots of young people needing apartments here to go to uni) and to not pay so much more in rent, as my mortgage payment is ~1/3 of a rent in a mostly shitty apartment for a single renter.
In the past 5 months I've been reading a lot on finance and markets as well as learning to screen stocks by analysing fundamentals, reading SEC's, white-papers and operational resumes of the companies I do research on and want to watchlist/buy.
Goals
My goals are really simple:
Strategy
As per goals, investment term is long term, mostly buy/hold.
To reach my goals, I want to follow a mixed strategy of value, growth and dividends. Yes, I know, young and dividends. But.
To reach my goals dividends are needed: for this year I'll be able to provide a good savings rate of 1500-2200 euros every 3 months in 2024, then it'll largely depend on how things go for 2025-2026. I'll have some known expenses and possibly some still uncertain, a couple of which could be big, so I need to preserve my cash allocation and saving rates could stop.
Enough dividends with a null/reduced saving rate can be used for some buying power or used for covering interest of loan/margin when free cash flow is unavailable or reduced, but rates need to go down for good before I can consider this.
Then again, the dividend compound effect will enable me to reach and sustain all my three goals eventually, but only if paired with value and growth options.
Positions and future possibile positions
Onto the portfolio I have built so far! Currently US heavy, will always be US heavy, but in the last section I have plans for that, you'll see.
The allocation is 60/40 ETF/Shares with +-10 tolerance accounted for.
ETF allocations:
Shares allocations go more by sector, region and value/growth/dividend ratio.
I'm actually investing a bit anti cyclically in Utilities ($NEE (+1,35 %) , $ENEL (+0,16 %) , $BEPC ), Solar/Solar related ($NEE (+1,35 %)
$ENEL (+0,16 %)
$BEPC
$NXT
$SHLS ) and Energy ( $NXE (-0,27 %) ) and ready to buy some dips in my current positions, or grow them if they please me with their performance.
Won't consider Oil and Mainstream by choice, except maybe for $PBR (-3,05 %) or $BIPC due to dividend.
$NXT and $SHLS are soaring right now, and are a really good combo of solid and innovation. (Cannot see the daily here on getquin tho)
$BEPC results compared to sector are solid, company strategy is very good, a little bit hated by market it seems. The same reasoning applies to $NEE (+1,35 %) , plus manatees! $ENEL (+0,16 %) also but without manatees and without good management (it's Italy after all), but still solid with a great moat and good div.
$NXE (-0,27 %) is super long term, I've read all the reports, primary concern is debt until building ops facilities is done and op can start for real. They are sitting on uranium next big thing and have good connection with the territory and authorities.
$HAUTO (+0,42 %) is actually filling the role of the best overall VGD stock, we will see after the div in March.
$BBVA (-0,33 %) really good bank and financial, my entry point in the financial sector at good value and also global.
$AMZN (+0,54 %)
$META (+0,05 %) and $NOVO B (-1,91 %) can speak for themselves as megacaps
Plans and ideas
So, after boring you for so long, the actual question/discussion section of this rant.
ETFs
Here I'm considering a possible 5% satellite, in the shape of Asia (ex-China)/Japan. I'll probably add one of $XMUJ (-1,12 %) , $DXJ (-0,99 %) or $V3PL (-0,64 %) , all distributing.
I like $DXJ (-0,99 %) maybe the most for its holdings but is sampled, $XMUJ (-1,12 %) good ter, phisycal full also, holdings a bit worse than $DXJ (-0,99 %) .
$V3PL (-0,64 %) seems to perform worse, but is more pan Asia, although not much value brought to the portfolio compared to the other two aside from region allocation.
Shares
In the short term, I want to add position for the REIT sector, as they are trading at a discount right now, and probably will shake off the priced in May FED cut that will in my opinion not happen (June I think more likely).
My watchlist consists of:
If you know some interesting ones or want to share some thoughts on some of those, it would help. Also, I have no idea of the possible allocations and will need to discuss it most likely.
Other things I'll closely watch to open a position will be:
First of all, thanks to you, who made it this far. And read all of this shit.
Every other suggestion is more than welcome of course, and I'd love to discuss further in the comments if you want to drop by!
Thanks :)
$O (-0,12 %)
$DLR (-0,42 %) I almost don't dare to post news about Realty anymore, but I want to get this out there, especially because it's one of my biggest single positions 😂.
@Kohlmeyse sorry 😅
Digital Realty and Realty Income establish joint venture to develop customized data centers
Meilleurs créateurs cette semaine