position at $AVGO (-0,04 %) further expanded.
13 years of stable upward trend, dividend growth is fantastic,
plus the tripling of the SaaS business
Postes
140position at $AVGO (-0,04 %) further expanded.
13 years of stable upward trend, dividend growth is fantastic,
plus the tripling of the SaaS business
$ASML (+0,93 %) is out, as I want to focus more on stocks with a healthy trend in the growth part of my portfolio. See the weekly chart.
At the moment I am running a 75/25 strategy with which I feel most comfortable, 15K divided as follows:
Growth 75%: $AVGO (-0,04 %)
$COST (-0,8 %)
$7011 (-1,27 %)
$MUV2 (+0 %)
$GOOG (-0,95 %)
$MUX (+0,93 %) (mutares is under observation by me) $2768 (-0,47 %)
Dividend 25%: $OBDC (-0,41 %)
$HTGC (+0,8 %)
$PSA (-0,75 %)
$JEGP (-0,1 %)
January is over. The first month of the year was relatively quiet for me: one hike and two ice baths in sub-zero temperatures. The investment knew what to do by itself. Time for a look back.
I present the following points for the past month of January 2025:
➡️ SHARES
➡️ ETFS
➡️ DISTRIBUTIONS
➡️ CASHBACK
➡️ AFTER-PURCHASES
➡️ P2P CREDITS
➡️ CRYPTO
➡️ AND OTHER?
➡️ OUTLOOK
➡️ Shares
After a strong month in December, my heavyweight among the individual stocks has $AVGO (-0,04 %) lost a bit of steam during the month, but is still up by over 250% overall. A performance that I did not expect when I selected my stocks.
On the other hand $NFLX (-2,01 %) and $SAP (+2,56 %) are performing well. Netflix with +179% and SAP now also in triple digits with +118%. Both are in 3rd and 4th place in terms of volume. $WMT (-0,98 %) now with +105%, also a doubler. It gets exciting behind them, the financial stocks are rising. $BAC (-0,11 %) ,$V (-0,65 %) and $MA (-0,16 %) continue to push forward. Is this now a sign that financial stocks will generally rise again? It's well known that profits are rising there. I suspect that the stock market will now price in Trump's deregulation of the sector.
The red lanterns will once again go to the usual suspects $NKE (+0,03 %) , $DHR (-1,55 %) and $CPB (+0,91 %) . All stocks are now performing even worse at -35%, -29% and -22%. They are among the smallest positions in my main equity portfolio with the $DHL (+0,3 %) . I'm not worried about the big drop yet, but I'm already taking a closer look. I would have expected Danaher in particular to be back in the black after the last split.
➡️ ETFs
ETFs are doing their thing as usual. What else can you say except the typical?
➡️ Distributions
I received 23 distributions on 12 payout days in January. I am grateful for this additional income stream. Everyone should build up their additional income this way.
➡️ Cashback
There was no cashback payment received in my accounts in January. The separation of REWE and Penny with Payback is making itself felt and I have to come up with a new system for continuing my "cashback pension". So far, I'm thinking about adding up the rebates on the receipts and transferring these amounts from the grocery account to the clearing accounts in order to invest them in one-off savings plans. However, I would only do this once a month because of the administrative effort involved. For DM, Payback continues as usual. But what I like about the REWE and Penny apps is that you can save the discounts in them, so I could use my old system there again. In the meantime, Kaufland is also coming back into focus for my weekly shopping.
➡️ Repeat purchases
There was a subsequent or new purchase of an ETF for my crypto successor portfolio, which was financed from a triggered BTC limit order. I invested in the $EXX5 (-0,07 %) .
➡️ P2P loans
With my last P2P platform, Mintos, there was a redemption payment in the cent range, otherwise the platform continues to hang on my leg like a ball and chain. I will gradually withdraw everything here and hopefully end my involvement in this asset class as soon as possible.
➡️ Crypto
January offered crypto investors a BTC ATH on Trump's inauguration on the one hand, but otherwise we are more likely to be dealing with a sideways market on the whole. As mentioned, I triggered a BTC sell limit order on the day of the inauguration. And it was even very close to the ATH. Around 1/3 of my total holdings have been sold since the beginning of November. I am still far from satisfied. But I need higher prices for further sales. Is my strategy working? Or is the bull market already over? I think it will continue, but not for much longer.
➡️ And what else?
Like many of you, I'm feeling the effects of the changes due to rising social security contributions and rising costs. My budget is set up so that my budgets and lump sums work on their own and I've managed well with my budget sizes too. The amount invested each month via savings plans was as large as possible. In the end, there was always an amount left over that went into my nest egg, the last bit, so to speak. This remaining €100 more than halved in January. On the one hand, it's not a problem, I could simply cut back on the savings plans, but I don't want to do that. I can't reduce my spending any further myself. I'm in a salary round, but it's very likely that I won't get a pay rise this year. I'm happy that my second income stream is growing steadily, even if it's not yet significantly noticeable. Now I'm thinking about how I can earn even more money, because taxes are set to rise further, not just social security contributions, the greedy state and greedy politicians are targeting our investment income and interpreting unfair taxation. Unfortunately, they are completely ignorant, because they do not understand that this is already taxed when it is taxed again for us investors (or has already been taxed twice - keyword withholding tax), or that social security contributions on it would mean a further entitlement to benefits from the funds for us as investors. And not just for us, but also for international investors. In contrast to rental income, for example, the deduction for capital income is immediate and not deferred. These are all considerations that are not taken into account by tax increase enthusiasts. Demanding tax increases in a high-tax country is proof of a lack of reality either way. For me, the entire state should continue to be slimmed down.
So you can see from the current political discourse that the state only wants to take away, instead of ensuring that citizens build up something for themselves with effort and sweat, which they then know how to look after and appreciate. However, a considerable promotion of private asset accumulation means that citizens may not need any or significantly fewer pension payments to ensure an adequate old age. I look with some envy at other countries that have much more sophisticated pension systems or sovereign wealth funds. I once wrote an article about the systems in Norway and Sweden.
➡️ Outlook
In February, I can expect reimbursements from the health insurance companies and the dental supplement, which I will invest in in the February review. Until then!
Links:
Social media links can be found in my profile, also feel free to check out the Instagram version of my review.
Building on my post from yesterday....
in this post I would like to write more about the transition from AI infrastructure expansion to the inference market, taking into account my personal assessment and using some sources. The stocks mentioned do not constitute investment advice. As always, the lines are intended to provide impulses to understand the potential winners of tomorrow.
In recent years and currently, a large proportion of investment has gone into building the infrastructure for artificial intelligence.
Tech giants and cloud providers have built huge data centers to enable the training phase of AI models such as GPT-4 or Gemini [1].
However, a paradigm shift is now emerging: the focus is shifting from expensive training to the inference market, i.e. the practical use and monetization of AI models, as general AI models will eventually become a "commodity".
When we say that AI is becoming a commodity, this means that artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming a standard technology that is readily available and accessible to many companies and industries, similar to electricity, the internet or cloud computing today.
Standardization and availability
Lower costs
Wide range of applications
Loss of competitive advantages
Long-term significance
In practice, this means that AI is no longer the exclusive domain of tech giants, but a tool that anyone can use to drive innovation.
📈 Why the shift to the inference market is inevitable
From training to inference: What's the difference?
Training:
AI models are trained with enormous amounts of data, a computationally intensive process that requires specialized hardware such as GPUs and TPUs. Companies such as Nvidia, AMD and Broadcom are benefiting greatly from the boom in data centers at this stage.
Inference:
Once training is complete, the models must be used in the real world, whether through chatbots, voice assistants or image processing. Efficiency is key here, as AI has to respond to millions of requests in real time.
Capital shift: the money follows the monetization
Infrastructure development completed:
Building training infrastructure is costly, but after a certain phase, the focus shifts to optimization and more efficient use over frugal training or specialized chips.
Energy efficiency and cost optimization:
Companies are looking for solutions that are not only powerful but also energy-efficient and cost-effective, a crucial factor in maximizing margins.
🔮 The growth market of the future
The inference market is expanding rapidly as AI applications penetrate more and more areas of life and work:
Automated customer service:
Chatbots and virtual assistants are replacing traditional call centers and offer round-the-clock support (e.g. IBM watsonx Assistant) [2].
Medical diagnostics:
AI-supported image analyses improve diagnostics and enable personalized therapies [3].
Language models & generative AI:
Applications such as ChatGPT or Google Bard are revolutionizing the field of generative AI.
Industry 4.0 & automation:
Smart factories and predictive maintenance increase efficiency in production [4].
🏆 The profiteers of the inference market - how are the Big Techs positioned?
📌 AMD
$AMD (+0,11 %) Nvidia's challenger in the inference sector
Technology:
Market outlook:
Nvidia $NVDA (-1,24 %) From training king to inference king?
Dominance in the training market:
Switch to inference mode:
Google
$GOOGL (-0,96 %) TPUs as the inference solution of the future
Own AI chips:
Range of applications:
Amazon
$AMZN (-0,61 %) The cloud giant with its own AI hardware
Inferentia chips:
Market penetration:
Microsoft
$MSFT (-0,71 %) Profiteer through OpenAI & Azure AI
Partnership with OpenAI:
Azure AI:
Future developments:
Broadcom
$AVGO (-0,04 %) The "hidden champion" for inference networks
Network technology:
Market Leadership:
Qualcomm
$QCOM (-0,12 %) Inference on the edge market
Edge Computing:
Smartphone applications:
🎯 Conclusion: the inference market could be the new AI gold rush
The AI boom is far from over, it's just shifting. While the expansion of infrastructure laid the foundation, the focus is now on continuous revenue from inference solutions.
The inference market has long been a reality and is not a short-term phenomenon.
❓Which companies do you see benefiting alongside the big players?
In yesterday's post, I briefly outlined my personal portfolio breakdown on the topic of the AI revolution.
Thanks for reading! 🤝
__________
Sources:
[1]
https://datacentremagazine.com/it/gartner-why-global-it-spending-will-hit-us-5-61tn-in-2025
[2]
[3]
https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/themes/whats-next-in-ai-and-healthcare
[4] https://www.deloitte.com/de/de/issues/innovation-ai/industrie-40.html
[5] https://www.amd.com/de/products/accelerators/instinct/mi300/mi300x.html
[6]
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/
[7]
[8]
Graphic: AI generated
The rapid development of AI has triggered a veritable boom in data centers. Companies such as OpenAI and DeepSeek are driving this revolution and the demand for high-performance servers is growing exponentially.
However, the increase in computing power is also accompanied by massive energy consumption, an issue that is leading to global discussions about infrastructure, efficiency and future investments [1].
At the same time, the question arises as to whether there is currently an overinvestment in computing power. The Chinese AI company DeepSeek, for example, has presented a model that works more efficiently than previous large language models (LLMs).
Does this mean that we will soon need less computing power?
Or will the Jevons paradox occur instead, i.e. the effect that more efficient technologies actually increase overall consumption in the long term? [2, 3]
In this article, I will focus on the key developments in the data center sector, the growing demand for energy, regional characteristics, current challenges and potential investment opportunities.
As always, the article is intended to shed light on the background to current events, provide food for thought and give impetus. The stocks mentioned do not, of course, constitute investment advice.
🤖 Data centers: the foundation of the AI revolution
The growing global demand for AI-supported software and digital applications requires powerful data centers. Goldman Sachs analysts forecast that the global demand for power from data centers will increase by 50% by 2027 and by up to 165 % could increase [1].
This chart below forecasts the energy consumption of data centers (in terawatt hours) by 2030, distinguishing between AI- and non-AI-based applications in the US and the rest of the world. Total consumption is expected to rise to over 1,000 TWh by 2030 [4].
Our analysts expect data center power consumption to increase by more than 160% by 2030
Source: [4], primary: Masanet et al. (2020), Cisco, IEA, Goldman Sachs Research
This data shows how AI applications will massively increase energy consumption. The rapid increase in the area of "US AI" and "Rest of world AI" is particularly striking.
The three main reasons for this increase are
New models such as GPT-5 or DeepSeek AI require more and more computing power. Training and operating these models requires trillions of calculations [1].
Companies are integrating AI into numerous applications: from search engines to personalized financial and healthcare services.
As digitalization progresses, the global demand for data storage and cloud services is increasing [1].
Which companies dominate the market?
On the demand side for data centers, large hyperscale cloud providers and other companies are building large language models (LLMs) that are capable of processing and understanding natural language. These models need to be trained on huge amounts of information using power-intensive processors [4].
On the supply side, hyperscale cloud companies, data center operators and asset managers are deploying large amounts of capital to build new high-capacity data centers.
These include, among others:
In addition, specialized data center providers such as Equinix $EQIX (-0,46 %) and Digital Realty $DLR (-1,59 %) as they supply physical infrastructure to the hyperscalers [6].
According to Goldman Sachs Research, demand for data center infrastructure will increasingly outstrip supply in the coming years.
The utilization rate of existing data centers is expected to rise from around 85% in 2023 to more than 95% by the end of 2026. However, the situation is expected to ease from 2027 onwards as new data centers are commissioned and demand growth driven by AI slows down (see chart below) [1].
Goldman Sachs currently estimates that the global power consumption of the data center market is around 55 gigawatts (GW). This is made up of cloud computing workloads (54%), traditional workloads such as email or data storage (32%) and AI (14%) [1].
For the future, analysts predict that electricity demand will increase to 84 GW by 2027. The share of AI is expected to grow to 27%, while the cloud share will fall to 50% and traditional workloads to 23% [1].
By the end of 2030, around 122 gigawatts (GW) of data center capacity will be online.
At this point, I asked myself as a layman how the units mentioned so far are to be understood, in my first graphic I speak of 1,000 TWh of energy consumption of all data centers by 2030 and now here is talk of 122 GW of data center capacity? In order not to go completely beyond the scope of the article, I have added a section at the very end in case some of you also feel like a layman and want to put the "units" into perspective.
... and now on with the article...
One central problem remains:
Where does all the energy come from?
⚡️Energieversorgung: Can the grid keep up?
According to estimates by Goldman Sachs, more than 720 billion US dollars will have to be invested in expanding the power grid worldwide by 2030 in order to supply the new data centers with sufficient energy [1].
Europe in particular, where electricity consumption was expected to decline for many years, is experiencing a veritable "demand shock" [1].
Which energy sources supply data centers?
Natural gas is seen as a realistic short-term solution to meet continuous demand. It serves as a bridging technology until renewable energy and storage solutions are further developed, as renewable energy is not available around the clock [4].
Wind and solar energy could cover around 80 % of demand in the long term, provided that sufficient storage solutions are integrated [4].
In practice, solar plants run on average only about 6 hours per day, while wind power plants run on average 9 hours per day. There is also a daily volatility in the capacity of these sources, depending on the radiation of the sun and the strength of the wind [4].
The graph shows the fluctuations in capacity factors for wind and solar energy in the USA in 2023. The capacity factor indicates how efficiently an energy source utilizes its maximum output throughout the year.
The graph illustrates that wind and solar energy can complement each other seasonally: While wind is more efficient in winter, solar energy provides the highest yields in summer. This shows how important a balanced energy mix is to ensure security of supply.
In addition to finding environmentally friendly energy sources to power data centers, technology providers can reduce emissions intensity through efficiency gains.
The following chart shows the development of the workload and energy consumption of data centers between 2015 and 2023. Although the workload almost tripled, energy consumption remained almost constant until 2019 thanks to efficiency gains. The efficiency gains then slowed down from 2020 onwards.
Source: [4], primary: Masanet et al. (2020), IEA, Cisco, Goldman Sachs Research
This chart supports the discussion on the Jevons paradox (see below). Efficiency gains could be offset or even exceeded in the long term by higher workloads and AI demand. This highlights the need to make data center energy sources more sustainable.
Meanwhile, governments are also becoming more supportive of nuclear energy on the whole. Switzerland is reconsidering the use of nuclear generators for its electricity supply, while nuclear energy enjoys bipartisan support in the US and the Australian opposition party has put forward plans to introduce nuclear reactors [4].
Participants at the COP28 conference at the end of 2023, an annual summit convened by the United Nations to combat climate change, agreed to triple global nuclear capacity by 2050 [4].
Nuclear energy is considered the ideal option for basic power supply as it provides a reliable and constant supply of energy.
As a result, more and more large tech companies such as Alphabet, Amazon and Microsoft are turning to small modular nuclear power plants (SMRs).
📊 Increasing efficiency & the Jevons paradox
With new technologies such as DeepSeek, AI could work more efficiently in the future. But does greater efficiency automatically mean that less computing power is required?
The Jevons paradox: More efficiency = more consumption?
The Jevons paradox describes the fact that increases in efficiency often do not lead to lower consumption, but to higher consumption overall.
-Example:
In the 19th century, more efficient steam engines did not lead to lower coal consumption; on the contrary, as the machines became cheaper and more versatile, coal consumption actually increased.
With cars: more fuel-efficient engines did not lead to less gasoline consumption, but to people driving more cars.
-Applied to AI:
As AI models become more efficient, the cost per computation decreases. This makes AI applications attractive in even more areas, which in turn leads to a higher overall demand for computing power.
🌎 Regional distribution and global expansion of data center infrastructure
Current distribution: Where are the data centers located today?
Today, most data centers are located in the Asia-Pacific region and North America. Well-known locations are:
North America:
- Northern Virginia
- San Francisco Bay Area
Asia: Beijing
- Beijing
- Shanghai
These regions are characterized by high computing power, intensive data traffic and strong demand from corporate campuses [1].
The chart also shows the historical development of data center capacity by region (North America, APAC, etc.) from 2017 to 2024. The figures illustrate how fast the infrastructure for the AI revolution is growing and underlines why the energy requirements of data centers are increasing so rapidly.
The increase in capacity from around 20 GW in 2017 to almost 60 GW in 2024 shows an enormous growth trend. This correlates directly with the increasing demand for AI applications and cloud computing.
How is supply growing?
Goldman Sachs Research estimates that global data center capacity will increase to around 122 GW by the end of 2030, as mentioned above. The share of hyperscalers and specialized operators will increase from the current 60% to around 70% [1].
The largest expansion of data centers has been recorded here in the past ten years.
The largest expansion of new data centers is planned in North America over the next five years.
📈 Investment opportunities: Some winners of the AI and data center revolution
US shares e.g.:
European stocks e.g.:
Japanese stocks e.g:
🧠 Conclusion: AI, data centers & energy as the trend of the century?
Although some analysts warn of possible overinvestment, the figures indicate that the demand for computing power and energy for AI data centers will continue to rise sharply.
The biggest winners are therefore:
In the long term, these companies could be among the biggest beneficiaries of the coming decades.
👨🏽💻 How do I position myself?
Personally, I think I am well positioned with the NASDAQ 100 $CSNDX (-0,74 %) (portfolio share of 23%), as the focus is on US technology and growth stocks. The ETF complements my All-World with a stronger weighting in innovative sectors such as AI and cloud computing.
In the near future, I will also take a closer look at Daikin Industrie $6367 (-0,89 %) share in order to increase the exposure to Japan and the share price offers an entry point at first glance.
In addition, AMD $AMD (+0,11 %) has also caught my attention, the reason being its positioning in the aforementioned interference market. Most of the capital is currently flowing into the expansion of new AI models. However, as soon as these become a "commodity" and everyone uses them, most of the capital will probably flow into the interference market (market for the application of AI models).
Furthermore, I have Siemens AG $SIE (+0,92 %) with approx. 2.3% portfolio share (still growing to approx. 4%), which I also see as well positioned for the future for the following reasons (in the context of the article):
Network stability
Data center control
Efficient building structure
Not directly cooling systems, but:
What is your opinion❓
Thanks for reading! 🤝
...Said digression follows after the sources...
__________
Sources:
[2] "The Coal Question"
http://digamo.free.fr/peart96.pdf
[3] https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons-Paradoxon
[5] https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai
[6] https://www.cbre.com/insights/reports/global-data-center-trends-2024
__________
🧭 Digression: on gigawatts and terawatt hours
In order to understand the relationship between the two figures, 122 GW (gigawatts) and 1,000 TWh (terawatt hours), it is important to clarify the units and their meaning:
Refers to the current average power capacity that data centers worldwide require to function. Power (measured in GW) describes the amount of energy consumed per second. This is therefore a snapshot of energy requirements.
This is an indication of energy consumption over a certain period of time, in this case one year. It describes how much energy is required in total in 12 months.
The forecast of 1,000 TWh is slightly below the value resulting from the calculation. The graph shows values slightly above 1,000 TWh; according to the calculation based on 122 GW of power capacity, energy consumption should be around 1,069 TWh.
Nevertheless, general reasons for deviations may be as follows:
This shows how much the demand for data centers and energy will increase due to AI and digitalization by 2030
__________
+ 2
Moin moin
new month and therefore fresh 12k available for new investments. Here are my current open limit orders for week 6 ...
Everything between 2% and 10% below the current level. Let's see if there is a dip or two. I am still waiting with additional purchases, as I actually want to have a few new positions first.
$$P1KG34
$HSY (+1,73 %)
$AMT (+1,23 %)
$AVGO (-0,04 %)
$8001 (+0,01 %)
No buying advice or recommendation to buy
The financial markets have provided us with some exciting developments this week. Today's newsletter brings you the most important events in a compact and understandable way:
From DeepSeekthe Chinese AI start-up that has surprised the technology sector with an innovative approach, to the latest interest rate decisions of the central banks, to the mixed quarterly quarterly figures from Tesla - it was a week full of headlines.
Enjoy reading!
DeepSeek: China's new AI player and its consequences
The Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek has caused quite a stir with its new model DeepSeek R1. The AI chatbot, launched on January 20, is now one of the most downloaded apps worldwide. In the USA, it currently occupies 1st place in the iPhone app storeeven ahead of ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. The app is also one of the top downloads in Germany. Users can chat with the AI, upload files or carry out web searches - and the basic version is free.
What makes it special: DeepSeek's chatbot is said to require significantly less computing power than comparable models from large US companies such as OpenAI or Google $GOOGL (-0,96 %) . According to reports, around 2,000 Nvidia H800 graphics processors were used to train DeepSeek-R1, resulting in costs of around 6 million US dollars. By comparison, OpenAI invested around USD 100 million in the development of GPT-4 in 2023. This efficiency calls into question the previous assumption that high-performance AI models necessarily require investments in the billions and specialized high-performance chips. If these figures prove to be true, this could increase the pressure on US companies to rethink their cost structures and investment strategies.
This surprising development and the associated uncertainty triggered a significant reaction on the stock market on Monday. The US tech index Nasdaq 100 lost around 3%, and Nvidia in particular $NVDA (-1,24 %) - the leading provider of chips for AI applications, which has benefited enormously from the AI trend in recent years - fell by almost 17%. Companies such as Broadcom $AVGO (-0,04 %) , AMD $AMD (+0,11 %) , ASML $ASML (+0,93 %) and Microsoft $MSFT (-0,71 %) also came under pressure in the meantime. Most tech stocks stabilized somewhat over the course of the week. This is because some experts are questioning the transparency of DeepSeek's data from China and are urging caution when assessing the actual performance and efficiency of the model. It is already becoming apparent that DeepSeek's actual cost advantages could be lower than initially assumed - further developments remain to be seen.
What you as an investor can learn from the DeepSeek turmoil:
Interest rate decisions: What the ECB and Fed mean for the market
This week there were two landmark interest rate decisions - one in Europe, one in the USA.
A brief reminder: Developments and expectations regarding key interest rates are a decisive factor for the stock market. Falling interest rates make loans cheaper and boost investment and consumption. This often causes share prices to rise. Rising interest rates, on the other hand, slow down growth and make alternative investments such as bonds more attractive - this can put pressure on shares.
Hot phase of the reporting season for many companies in the S&P 500
We are currently in the middle of the phase in which many US companies publish their figures for the last quarter. The following chart from Fundstrat provides an overview of the results so far and how they have been received by the market:
As of Wednesday this week, 103 of the 500 companies in the S&P 500 have reported their quarterly results for Q4 2024. 79% of the companies have beaten exceeded earnings estimateswhich indicates an overall strong operating performance. The positive surprise factor of 6.1% shows that companies are performing better than analysts had expected. The S&P 500 is up 3.2% since 12/31/2024, also indicating positive market sentiment. The solid earnings season so far therefore appears to be boosting investor confidence in corporate earnings.
The reports and forecasts of some heavyweights such as Meta $META (-0,09 %) , ASML $ASML (+0,93 %) , Netflix $NFLX (-2,01 %) , Mastercard $MA (-0,16 %) and Intuitive Surgical $ISRG (-0,97 %) were well received by investors mostly well well received by investors. Microsoft $MSFT (-0,71 %) on the other hand, showed a rather subdued share price reaction to the results presented and the short-term outlook. Tesla Tesla $TSLA (-6,5 %) a company in my portfolio, also presented its figures this week for Q4 2024 with mixed results. The most important findings are summarized here in a compact and understandable way:
To put things in context: The company is 2024/25 in a transition phase between two growth cycles. The first phase began at the end of the 2010s with the scaling of electric cars, while a new boost is expected from 2026/27/28 due to the introduction of autonomous driving and humanoid robots.
Finally, some noteworthy quotes from the earnings call from Elon Musk - as always, to be interpreted with caution. Tesla's current high valuation is not based on measurable sales and earnings growth, but above all on ambitious plans for the future, which are fraught with uncertainty:
I bought my last Tesla shares in August 2024 at €196 - I only plan to buy more when the valuation becomes more realistic and attractive again. I consider a fair valuation to be a price/sales ratio in the range of 8-12x (currently 13x), below that an entry would be much more interesting.
Thank you for reading.
Stay informed and invest wisely.
$META (-0,09 %)
$AVGO (-0,04 %)
...starting with ranking and recommendation inference for ads and organic content. By 2025, they plan to extend MTIA to training workloads, aiming to cut reliance on $NVDA (-1,24 %) GPUs.
Meta is also stretching server lifespans to 5.5 years to lower CapEx and depreciation costs. Meanwhile, $NVDA is down 5%, as this move could hit future data center GPU sales.
Hiring is focused on technical talent, with 90% of YoY headcount growth in R&D. They’re prioritizing infrastructure, monetization, Reality Labs, and generative AI, while business function hiring stays limited.
Meilleurs créateurs cette semaine