1Año·

Hello dear community,

I would like to save in a Nasdaq 100 ETF and have stumbled across $ANAV (+2,46 %) because it is the cheapest one I have found. And since it is a full replication of the index, it makes sense to look for a low TER, right?

I'm still relatively new to this and would like to hear your opinion on the ETF.

Thanks in advance.

4 Comentarios

Luffy@Luffy3D2Y

1Año

I also still look at the fund size and the actual performance over the last few years as an indication of whether it manages to regularly beat other funds on the index. But the latter is just pure optimization. It is important that it has a good fund size so that it is also worthwhile for the provider to keep this ETF running in the long term. I took a look at the ETF and it has a reasonable size and is already pretty cheap :)

•

sydev@sydev

1Año

@Luffy3D2Y Yes, I also looked at the fund volume and I thought it was big enough at just under 800 million.

In terms of duration and comparison with other ETFs on the Nasdaq 100, $ANAV is still too young. I was only able to compare the performance of one year with the other ETFs, and it is even slightly ahead.

•

Ella M.@DividendenWaschbaer

1Año

@sydev That's just a lot of math.
The tracking difference to the iShares $CSNDX is simply high. I think the $ANAV is at -0.46, while the iShares is at -0.19 or so.

On the other hand, the iShares has a TER of 0.33 again

Whether this really makes much difference in practice and whether it will remain so in the future is of course questionable. Starting next month, I'll be saving with $CSNDX because it's simply the biggest and I like iShares. That's it 🤷🏻‍♂️😅

•

Luffy@Luffy3D2Y

1Año

@sydev Yes, I've seen it. For being quite young, it already has an enormous volume. Probably because it is very popular due to its low TER. I'd take it too. I don't care about the BigPlayer names as long as the key data is right and for me everything is right so far.

•