5Lun·

Fund domicile: Luxembourg vs Ireland

Hi Community, I am hesitating between the following two ETFs $LCUW and $MWRD (-0,25 %) to finally replace my savings plan on the Uniglobal $U1IH (+0,11 %) savings plan.

Both ETFs track the MSCI World and are issued by Amundi, but one is domiciled in Ireland and the other in Luxembourg.

Should I even be interested in this? If so, why?


Edit: I have just found this article from @Dividendenopi (thanks for that!) https://getqu.in/qTHc5O/. Regardless, I'm still interested in the above question ;)


Thank you,

Your Brokémon

attachment
3
13 Comentarios

Yes, it makes a difference where the fund is domiciled, especially for US equities. Ireland's tax treaty is much more favorable for physically replicating ETFs than in other European countries. I have picked out a link for you:

https://www.justetf.com/de/news/etf/us-quellensteuer-sparen-mit-den-richtigen-etfs.html
5
Ver todas las 6 respuestas adicionales
Imagen de perfil
For US equities and physically replicated Ireland due to tax benefits
2
Imagen de perfil
As @Divy rightly said, one vote from me for Ireland. And one against Aumundi. I also had an ETF on the Russell 2000 from them, the emphasis is on had.
1
Imagen de perfil
IE.

No WHT from them to my country.
Makes my declaration more simple. Doesn't change the amount I must pay (sadly)
Imagen de perfil
Colleague, please take a look at what is about to happen to $LCUW and think about it again
Imagen de perfil
@user03 Colleague, please read the article to the end.
Imagen de perfil
@Brokemon Colleague you made an "edit" that wasn't there when I wrote my comment
Únase a la conversación