1Yr·

Hello all,

I am thinking about buying a property as an investment.


What is your opinion on the subject of real estate?


Specifically, I want to create an outperformance of alternatives ( ALL WORLD ETF ( 6% ).


In Berlin I have an offer for an apartment (100 sqm) old building for 5100€qm.


that is m.E. a very good price for the location etc... and nevertheless I come just in such a way (13€ rent presupposed) on a net yield of around 6%...

clear if you add a value increase of about 1.24% it gets a little better.


basically I do not understand how people invest profitable in real estate.


Who of you invests in real estate and what return are you looking for? Is there anything I am missing?


thank you 😘

9
102 Comments

profile image
The investment is absolutely uninteresting - the rent is too low for the purchase price - the risk is too high because of the old building - you have to submit to the decisions of the other owners with one residential unit - fix & flip will probably not work - holding for 10 years and then selling is unprofitable because the costs are too high and the rent is too low - holding for the long term is also unprofitable and the risk is far too high with the figures mentioned - an object in which I would never invest. In principle, you can achieve very good returns with real estate above the performance of an etf. This is simply due to the leverage of the borrowed capital, or leverage effect. It doesn't matter if interest rates are high or low, it just depends on the offer. What you should say goodbye to is the thought "I don't have any work with that". Real estate is work. Tenants make work. If you don't feel like it and don't want to deal with the subject yourself, it's not for you.
11
profile image
Your feeling is quite right, but hardly anyone outperforms with real estate investments. If you don't have some unique selling point, such as your own craftsman's business that carries out renovations at cost price, or huge cash reserves with which you can buy absolute hype locations or luxury properties, you don't outperform the stock market, apart from merely temporary exceptions, such as Munich/Berlin/Hamburg over the last 10 years.

In my view, the good reputation of concrete gold is solely due to the fact that real estate loans are almost the only form of investment that forces the average German to regularly invest at a high savings rate over the long term and regardless of the economic situation. And a property financed over 30 years with a long-term return of 2-3% beats the active savings bank fund, which is sold in a panic in a stock market crash, and also the savings book. However, it certainly does not beat a world ETF that has been saved over 30 years.
10
profile image
@PassiveAggressive Too bad actually exactly what I thought. Do you have an approach to diversify better. Everything in stocks increasingly bothers me.
profile image
@JKTaurus etf? You can sleep very calm when you know you have a 200.000€ world etf :)
profile image
@Kronos_ you're better built than I am. I would not like to have more than 30% in shares in any form.
profile image
@JKTaurus I could also recommend you bonds and tangible assets :)
1
profile image
@JKTaurus Unfortunately, I don't know of anything better in terms of the risk/return ratio. Apart from the nest egg, I am 100% invested in shares myself. A future owner-occupied property could still come - but only for the lifestyle and definitely not for the return. You can, if you want to diversify over other asset classes, of course (government) bonds. They bring a little more stability, but reduce the return compared to 100% equities. To get even more out of the passive equity approach, you can also use smart beta factors. This way you will get at least statistically a few more basis points over the long term (far beyond 15 years). However, it remains roughly with the passive and rule-based world ETF. Everything else with excess return potential (self-founding, stock picking, crypto, market timing,...) unfortunately has no historical "guarantee of success", no matter how hard you try.
1
profile image
@JKTaurus You can of course add gold, bonds, time deposits and crypto. Whether you're better off with that, don't know.... But actually, the logic behind a world ETF is simple: it goes up when the world economy goes up. Since every government and almost every company in the world has an interest in growth, you can assume that everything will be done so that the world economy will continue to grow. And if that should no longer be the case, we will probably have completely different problems or no problems at all. And then your world ETF doesn't matter.
3
profile image
@PassiveAggressive Thank you for the beautiful and apt wording. Especially the last paragraph is pure gold!
profile image
@DonkeyInvestor that with the world ETF is clear to me and also my thesis. I am just looking for other values / investments that are comparable in terms of return and the effort if rewarded with. There seems to be as you already noted nothing like that.
profile image
@JKTaurus What do you think is wrong with a share of > 30%?
profile image
@KevinC you probably mean against a share size to 30%
View all 4 further answers
So fiscally, real estate can be very very interesting, so I would definitely advise you to see a good tax advisor. I bought three small apartments 3 years ago. All apartments have one thing in common - the sellers were well-disposed towards me and I was the first and only one to view the apartments. Speed is therefore insanely important. My target return after taxes is 13 percent (return on equity) p.a. - and that's at normal rental prices. But one cannot speak of passive income - rather entrepreneurship. Last week is almost before the purchase of another apartment - unfortunately, the seller then but still canceled. But the market has become more difficult - I visit significantly fewer apartments - now only those where private individuals are offered. But 510 K for 13 euros per square meter rent I find now not so good. So at the current interest rates, I would like to pay a maximum of 20 annual rents (in Stuttgart). Many greetings and a nice evening 🖖
3
profile image
@Moneymoney 13% is of course fantastic. So do I have to reduce the purchase price extremely or do you get there through some tax tricks?
profile image
@Moneymoney and I thought you were from Heidelberg. So from the name. Learned something again 👍
4
@JKTaurus probably both. But I don't know the real estate market in Berlin in detail. I would say that in Munich, for example, it is impossible to buy an apartment for 20 annual rents. For my apartment I have paid between 22-24 annual rents - but for that I have an average interest rate of 1.2 percent. The profit is in the purchase. I bought all the apartments furnished. The furniture can be depreciated well and quickly. Our income is not mega high - just above the average in Stuttgart - but we already have the top tax rate - the higher the tax rate, the more you can deduct. On the subject of taxes, I'll give you a few keywords that you can google and ask your tax advisor. Unsecured private loans from family members, spousal swing - immocation is a good YouTube channel for this topic - even if in my view they clearly exaggerate the scope for negotiation.
2
profile image
@Moneymoney top, thank you. Immocation I have seen on Google looks extremely unserious to me. 😅 but maybe I need to open up more.
@JKTaurus really. Nah immocation is really good 👍🏻...they just massively exaggerate on the negotiating leverage. It must be said that the average real estate purchase is probably really bad. But if you actually find a favorable object - for whatever reason (personal contact or sympathy) then a deal is worthwhile. Important are a good credit rating, high tax rate, a good tax advisor and you must not remain in his investment . Of advantage are also craftsmanship- but I also do not have. 😂
profile image
I bought in 2015 in Chemnitz 75sqm bj 1995 for 89,000. Initial rent was 380€ cold now 490€ cold. Until now the return was good but I prefer to make shares. Immos are not so easy to maintain
3
profile image
@MiIliardenmehling did you have a thesis regarding rent increases and or a target return on purchase?
profile image
@JKTaurus I calculated the return on equity beforehand. annual net cold rent -costs / capital employed*100 In my case, that was "only" 15% with which my capital earns interest. I had to bring 25,000€ EK, but no matter. The return grows with rent increases and paying off the loan because less interest year after year. Also the loan devalues itself by the money inflation. Wages increase yearly about 3% while the loan amount stays the same. Interest is at 1.77% so the loan is more or less free.
profile image
@MiIliardenmehling A very good 15% is really respectable. 25,000 EK and there are then also the costs for notary and land transfer tax etc. in it? Sounds relatively little to me at first. 
profile image
@JKTaurus yes, ancillary costs included. In Saxony, by the way, the land transfer tax is only 3.5%.
profile image
The advantage of real estate is that you don't get a daily price, like with stocks or an ETF. That lets most Germans sleep better...
2
profile image
I started, almost 20 years ago, with one-room apartments. Then umgeschichtetet on 2-3 room apartments. since two years everything is sold. apartments have advantages and disadvantages, which one must be aware! I could work with the leverage the real estate offer well. One must use the tax advantages. With "debts" calmly sleep to be able. And after 10 years sell and again new buy. Quickly become rich is not given, completely on the contrary evtl. Much work. If you are aware of that it is ok. Normally a full-length topic. And not a three liner.
2
profile image
@Hodlinvestor Why are you currently selling everything? Do you no longer see any increase in the value of the property? I read a forecast for Berlin that said 1.24% per year for the next 30 years.
profile image
I bought a 54m² new apartment in 2017 for about 400,000 € including utilities. 130,000 € were equity, the rest is financed at just under 2% (rate 1,280 €). With house money (about 360 €) and personal reserves (200 €) results in a warm rent of 1,280 €, that I have to contribute about 560 € per month. But this is planned on purpose, quasi as a mandatory savings rate. If I then add the additional costs, the tax depreciation and the advertising costs, it comes out altogether on a scarce red zero. Of course I don't have a positive cash flow until the loan is paid off (unless I increase the rent), but after that I have a paid-off condo and all income remains with me. I calculate with about 800€ per month after taxes, appreciation and rent increases left out of the equation. There is definitely work involved in renting: finding tenants, owners' meetings, ... If this is not your thing, an administrator can do it for you, but then your return suffers a lot. P.s. Apartment is in the Speckgürtel of Munich, so the rent is even fair and not expensive. I am one of the cheapest landlords in the entire Komolex.
1
profile image
@Chefkoch256 basically means you're not doing this for a return aspect? What is your motivation behind it? 
profile image
@JKTaurus not in the short term. Once the loan has been repaid, I will increase my salary and later my pension by around €800 net per month. That's almost €10,000 a year, and in addition I still have the equivalent value of the apartment up my sleeve. Thanks to index rent, this adjusts to inflation, so I can neglect that. I would rather compare it to a dividend strategy, where you also rely on cash flow, but with an apartment you have much less fluctuation in terms of the value of the apartment and the amount of rent. A regularly paying tenant as a prerequisite, of course.
profile image
@Chefkoch256 If I see this correctly, you are then somewhere around two maybe 3% yield, right?
profile image
@JKTaurus All in all, a very positive calculation: very low risk with a very secure return, and that after taxes and inflation... In addition, there is still a lot that can be done via the tax, key words depreciation and income-related expenses.
profile image
I must confess; I have not read through all the answers, but real estate investments have a different way of yield... On the one hand, of course, interest (rent) and "price gains" (property / house increases in value). Since rarely jmd buys an apartment or a house cash, but ~20% cash reinschießt and the rest with FK (until 22 easy, now rather less) financed. This gives you a direct leverage on your equity + renovation costs / interest costs reduce your tax payable on the lease (+ after 10 Jahrwn is also the profit on the sale of the object tax free). You see, as always, it is not as simple as it is spoken. This "yes you would have just 1990 instead of 100k (20k EK and rest FK) in an apartment to put just 20k in the Dax geballert. Loans for securities are, to my knowledge, not particularly happy to grant and if then at far worse conditions ...
1
profile image
@tAdel I just have to look at this tax savings issue, I think. So far, I do not see how to get a return on it. After all, I have to spend money beforehand to be able to deduct them from taxes.
profile image
I wouldn’t invest in german real estate, so many stupid laws. Returns aren’t comparable to stocks…
1
profile image
I have invested in a property in Vienna and would do it again at any time.
1
profile image
@Aktienhengst are you from austria or have you invested abroad???
profile image
@JKTaurus no, I live in Vienna
profile image
Renovation, new heating, management...
profile image
@Portfoliopferd Yes, that's why I'm still so averse to making such an effort for 6% at the moment.
profile image
13 Euro rent for an apartment with 5100€/m2 and then also old building ? I feel really sorry for you in Berlin. Well then earn determined also accordingly.
profile image
@KleinviehmachtMist Maybe you could ask for more rent, but I prefer to be conservative in my calculations.
profile image
Real estate is in my opinion the heaviest investment what there is for private investors, with the current interest rates and prices there is anyway no more investment because you can not ask so much rent or the people can not pay. I myself rent for 13 years and that is almost a side job. I personally get me no more, with the conditions in this crazy country and the even crazier EU it is no longer fun, you are gutted like ne Christmas goose.
profile image
@Phily that is also the point that puts me off. renting is everything, but not passively earned money. That's why I'm invested exclusively in the stock market. Bought at the right time, properties are of course much more attractive, but the work remains. You have to want to do that and I have respect for every good landlord.
profile image
@Phily the point with the amount of rent. In relation to purchase price I also see. Regarding the attitude to EU and Germany, which I do not at all with. I think that here in Germany you are still offered much better opportunities than in most other countries. I think we have a theme here with constant complaining and everything is always bad there is a lack of doer quality. I personally also have no problem at all with paying taxes . Even if I would of course wish these would sometimes be a little lower, but at the end of the day you support the infrastructure that you use every day. 
profile image
@JKTaurus with Germany and the EU I meant, this Sanierungszwang and all other things where the two interfere in the private market economy and ruins the lives of many.
Deleted User
1Yr
Comment was deleted
profile image
@Djokovic_GOAT then you have been lucky so far.
1
profile image
@Djokovic_GOAT I am currently on a finca (rent). In so far 6 days defective: air conditioning in 2 rooms, a bed collapsed. In my professional apartment is within 11 months 3x the heating in the bathroom completely failed, 2x dripped SOMETHING from the apartment above me through the ceiling, etc. I have some landlords in my family and can say that there are very many tenants who are very - to put it mildly - demanding (not to say "severely delayed paying", constantly in dispute with other residents of the house, rent nomadism, etc.).
profile image
@KevinC is that something you possibly get around with a certain price. So for example from 15 € the square meter you no longer have quite so bad?
profile image
@JKTaurus I think yes you can, have all the apartments I had so far (4) after the purchase immediately core renovated the youngest apartment bj98 and then rented accordingly expensive because then also comes a completely different clientele to rent, most of the problems I had with tenants were in my first apartment, which I could only renovate where the were outside. Small tip: rent nomads default insurance, is also liable for damages.
With 13€/m² you have with a 100% financing not even the interest of 4%.
A rented apartment and a 4 family house. Return good, but more headaches and effort than stocks, for example. Didn't think it would keep me so busy mentally. Various government decisions, gas crises, debt, etc. But nothing comes from nothing! 😅
View all 2 further answers
If real estate, then finance in such a way that the cash flow is positive and the real estate does not pay for itself. With the current interest rates and prices difficult, but not impossible. Whether increases in value are interesting, I'll tell you in 10 years.
Show answer
profile image
Small comparison between apartment and plant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xj8UF8mTaKg&t=336s
I had four apartments and am in the process of getting rid of them because the stress with the tenants is taking over my entire private life. There's always something going on, and as a landlord you can't do anything about it. Example: New tenants move into an apartment where there have never been complaints about anything. After two years there is mold in the bathroom (I have to pay for it), the repairman says that the tenants are clearly to blame, but he doesn't want to put it in writing because he doesn't want to go to court. Lawyer says, you would have to spend a lot of money on an expert opinion, but not worth it, because the courts rarely decide 100% for the landlord). Next example: Within 2 years, three window panes had cracks. Landlord says "Oh yes, the statics here in the house is so bad, that happens in all apartments". Inquiry with the administration, no, such a thing had never happened before. Lawyer: You can't do anything, you can't prove that it was the tenant, the window company doesn't want to give anything in writing because they don't want to go to court. Other apartment: Tenants moved out, were not Messis, just "normal" careless people, repair costs: 10,000 euros. Holes in room doors, charges of damage to property. Court: "These are normal damages caused by use". Always only trouble and no rights as a landlord.
Show answer
profile image
If you get a good loan, you definitely beat the stock market. Why? For two reasons: Reason 1: Leverage For a normal financing 80/20 (+you bear additional costs) you have a leverage of just under 2, so you get a return of around 12% in your case. Reason 2: Taxes If you hold the property for at least 10 years you can sell it tax free. The stock market would have to make about 16% over ten years to keep up with that. With various financing tricks or business design can be vllt still some assets rauskitzeln. Of course, real estate also involves risks (vacancy, maintenance) and some expense. But in the average case real estate beats shares. As I said, there should be no major risks and the financing must be on good terms.
profile image
Comment was deleted
View all 6 further answers
Deleted User
1Yr
Comment was deleted
View all 21 further answers
Deleted User
1Yr
Comment was deleted
View all 10 further answers
Join the conversation