3Sem.·

Feeding the beast

07.07

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Acheté x74 à 13,45 €

995,45 €

10 Commentaires

DerDanner@Therapeut

Can you explain to me what the negative aspects are here?
I find over 10% return per year as distributions, even paid out monthly, extremely good.
I would like to utilize my lump sum

••

Cekay@CMustermann

@Therapeut Capped upside, only limited capped downside. It's an experiment for me - so far quite good and it's currently available at a good price

•

DerDanner@Therapeut

There are better ones on TR, some only run at 6-8%

••

Cekay@CMustermann

@Therapeut Sorry, do you mean that as a question? If so, feel free to point it out. I haven't found any better CC ETFs yet. It's very difficult to evaluate them anyway, the return is actually irrelevant, but you don't want to make too much of a loss either, as that indicates a distribution from the substance.

••

DerDanner@Therapeut

@CMustermann $JEPQ this one, for example, only has 6%, is the display missing or what is the difference?

••

Cekay@CMustermann

@Therapeut do you think it's simply because it's only been running since the beginning of the year?

••

DerDanner@Therapeut

@CMustermann yes, I think more data is missing here.
Does the ETF consume itself? Will the ETF rise? Or will it stay sideways and fall?

••

Cekay@CMustermann

@Therapeut That's where it gets spongy for me. The CC Etfs were heavily hyped, but that has clearly subsided. This is in addition to the normal market movements due to tariffs and so on. I think in bad times they will have to eat themselves in order to maintain the return %.

•

Aurélie@LuxequityAurelie

@Therapeut there has been one of these in the USA since 2013. unfortunately the chart is very frightening... But I am invested in it myself, the problem is, as already mentioned, its upward performance is very limited because it is "called out" by the constant options... In the event of heavy losses, it takes losses with it and takes all the longer to rise again. So in sideways or upward phases it is certainly quite solid with the monthly premiums. Let's see... 😉

•

Cekay@CMustermann

@LuxequityAurelie With the distribution yield, performance is rather secondary, it is more interesting whether it performs the same over 5 years with distributions as the normal index...

••