LoginSignup
image de profil
Fortunus
@Quiny
1Sem.·

$WINC vs. $JEGP

I'm interested to know why many $JEGP (+0,42 %) in the portfolio, although there is also the $WINC (-0,13 %) which pursues a similar strategy but has a higher return and higher distribution so far.

2
18 Commentaires
image de profil
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
1Sem.
The two have very different profiles. One is strongly oriented towards the MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index (JEPG). The other is based instead on the classic MSCI World with its usual composition (WINC). I don't need that in my portfolio, for example. It would be too redundant for me. That's why JPM's active approach is more interesting for me.
•
7
•
image de profil
GeldGenie@GeldGenie
1Sem.
Benchmarking function needed? 👍 The ETFs are practically the same, but differ in performance depending on the section, logically due to the reference value. Soooo I can't quite understand your point.
•
1
•
image de profil
Fortunus@Quiny
1Sem.
@GeldGenie Equal is definitely something else for me.
+10,4% != +4,3%
••
image de profil
GeldGenie@GeldGenie
1Sem.
@Quiny Sooo in CHF at least it was the difference I quoted. If there was a PN I could show it 😅
••
image de profil
Banana M.@Banana_Millionaire
1Sem.
I honestly believe that most people are only interested in the monthly payout 😂
•
1
•
image de profil
Fortunus@Quiny
1Sem.
@Banana_Millionaire This is even higher at $WINC.
••
image de profil
Banana M.@Banana_Millionaire
1Sem.
@Quiny I mean the frequency. The $WINC distributes in January, April, July and October. The $JEGP every month.
It's completely banal, but many people have developed a fetish for it.
•
1
•
image de profil
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
1Sem.
@Banana_Millionaire you will probably be right
••
image de profil
Patrick@PaFl
1Sem.
The $WINC is "relatively" just under 18 months, I think. The volume of the ETF has been rising well since then $JEGP has been around for longer and is also better known. If you are purely interested in the distribution and less in the composition, I would give $WINC a chance.
•
1
•
image de profil
CieloAzul@Cieloazul
1Sem.
The Winc is the same as the Bali in the USA, isn't it?
•
1
•
image de profil
Saschko@WarrenamBuffet
1Sem.
@Cieloazul sure? But yes, it looks very similar...
•
1
•
image de profil
Yieldrology@Yield-Ahead
1Sem.
Not quite. $INCU corresponds $BALI
•
2
•
image de profil
Stefan@Da_Fischi
1Sem.
Because of the volatility, you can see the difference between the two very well in April.
••
image de profil
Oleg@ScorpionfromBW
1Sem.
Perhaps because of the TER, which is more than twice as low, and the fund volume, which is more than 10 times higher? In addition, the values and the breakdown are already different
••
image de profil
Saschko@WarrenamBuffet
1Sem.
@ScorpionfromBW the display here is not correct, both have TER 0.35
•
1
•
image de profil
Oleg@ScorpionfromBW
1Sem.
@WarrenamBuffet ok, I didn't know that.
••
image de profil
Saschko@WarrenamBuffet
1Sem.
@ScorpionfromBW yes that annoys me about getquin, some of the data is old or simply not correct
•
2
•
image de profil
Beleggen M.@fund_whisperer_1682
1Sem.
I agree, but better safe then sorry, got them both in my portfolio
••
Participez à la conversation
S'inscrireConnexion