3Sem.
The review is always wild. It always feels like I'm worse than the benchmark. Only once do I remember that I was better than the S&P. In March, when the S&P slumped, I even did without the Rewind. Maybe better for business and panicky investors 😂
Performed worse than the S&P again. But if I benchmark myself YTD or 1Y with Getquin, I'm about 6% better off 😅
Performed worse than the S&P again. But if I benchmark myself YTD or 1Y with Getquin, I'm about 6% better off 😅
•
22
•3Sem.
@SchlaubiSchlumpf Correction: 9.5% better than the S&P YtD. 5.9 YTD versus the S&P. If I had taken the Rewind to heart, I would have doubted my strategy far too often. As you can see, unfounded. Recency bias, if I understood correctly, you would also have to compare currency hedged. And why should you hedge the currency...
•
11
•
@SchlaubiSchlumpf
I think many people are too influenced by the Rewind.
They immediately panic when they do worse for a month or two. And then constantly change their strategy as a result.
I think many people are too influenced by the Rewind.
They immediately panic when they do worse for a month or two. And then constantly change their strategy as a result.
•
11
•
2Sem.
@SchlaubiSchlumpf My benchmark for August is again significantly better than the Rewind. How does this difference arise?
••
2Sem.
@Redfox77 I think the Rewind takes the index, the backtest the ETF? Then the index would presumably be calculated in dollars, but you would backtest against euros. The result would be two quite different results. But that's my guess. But it would be logical.
•
11
•