spread is what TR earns money with. How else can they offer order costs of €1 and still keep the business running?
It has to come from somewhere.
What's more, Vici probably doesn't have that much liquidity flowing in, especially not in EUR.
You can also change brokers. You'll have higher fees, but the spread will be better.
It has to come from somewhere.
What's more, Vici probably doesn't have that much liquidity flowing in, especially not in EUR.
You can also change brokers. You'll have higher fees, but the spread will be better.
•
1818
•
@DividendenWaschbaer My point is that there is no transparency at all. Tomorrow they can add x% without it being even remotely comprehensible. I have no problem with TR's business model. But not if the spread runs indiscriminately or always extremely in favor of the provider.
••
@trade_commander_2498 So I had a savings plan execution of MSFT today. According to getquin (price from L&S) the price at 16:43h was 441,775€. Executed at TR for 441,75€.
So in any case a very small spread. But liquidity is high there. Spread is mostly/often based on liquidity demand. I don't know of any normal brokers who a) keep their spreads constant (except for offers) and b) make them public.
As I said, I suspect that there was simply no demand at VICI and that's why the spread was so high. This is the case with some smaller stocks.
Try buying $UKW. Or $SSW
There's very often this warning when buying individually that the spread is over 1%.
So in any case a very small spread. But liquidity is high there. Spread is mostly/often based on liquidity demand. I don't know of any normal brokers who a) keep their spreads constant (except for offers) and b) make them public.
As I said, I suspect that there was simply no demand at VICI and that's why the spread was so high. This is the case with some smaller stocks.
Try buying $UKW. Or $SSW
There's very often this warning when buying individually that the spread is over 1%.
•
11
•@DividendenWaschbaer Thank you for your answer. 👍🏻
••