Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF debate on position

Hi all, I'm keen to understand your thoughts on the following. When would you consider $FGEQ (+0,11 %) instead of $VWRL (+0,15 %) as the core of a portfolio? What would be the benefit of one above the other? I used to have $VWRL (+0,15 %) as core, but have switched over to $FGEQ (+0,11 %) with $TDIV (+0,54 %) on the side and a little of $IAPD (+1,06 %) .

I know they track different indexes, as $FGEQ (+0,11 %) track high quality companies from developed markets, while $VWRL (+0,15 %) tracks stocks from both developed and emerging countries.

$FGEQ (+0,11 %) while lacking emerging countries, still has decent growth.

Would you consider $FGEQ (+0,11 %) vs $GGRP (+0,34 %) or go for a more quality oriented ETF such as $IS3R (-0,2 %) to try to grab a little more return?

I'm reconsidering my positions and wondering if I should move some of them around and/or back to where they came from. I've done some DYOR, which has for now lead me to the conclusion to keep $FGEQ (+0,11 %) as the main position and expand a bit into $IS3R (-0,2 %) on the side.

Wondering what your thoughts are :)

ShufStiX@ShufStiX

8Mo

I‘m having both. Even added further ETF to get a monthly dividend and still get nice growth

•

$VWRL $FGEQ $GGRP $TDIV $JEGP $FYEQ

S@ThePower

Thanks for the advice. In my 2025 plan i've decided to continue to expand the $FGEQ position and use $IS3R for exposure to momentum with a higher return. $TDIV remains te dividend ETF and $VHYL had been sold and absorbed into it. For now $GGRP remains but likely will move that into the $FGEQ position as well. Let's see how that goes.

Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF - debate on position.