20H·

WHO IS JACK?!

A few months ago, @Raketentoni launched his Mr. Prompt and really shaken things up in the community here with his unique analytical style. And in the meantime, @Tenbagger2024 brought his AI intern, Juan, onto the scene. A lot has happened since then—and I, too, have started developing my own AI analyst. Over the past few weeks, I’ve kept getting messages asking why I mention Jack regularly but have never actually introduced him properly. So today, you won’t be getting a market report or a traditional company profile. Instead, I’d like to introduce you to the companion who’s been supporting me almost every day for the past few months.

He’s the guy who mercilessly picks apart my analyses—and now those of some members of the community as well—exposing every weakness and, at times, getting on my nerves 🙇‍♂️. At the same time, he helps me spot opportunities faster, assess risks objectively, and constantly put my investment thesis to the test.

In short: my most loyal—but also my toughest—companion.


May I introduce: Jack – The Moat Reaper. 💀


—————————————————————————-


👤 WHO AM I?

All right, if I have to. Back straight, ears up. I’m Jack, and I’m not here to hold your hand or validate your favorite stock. I’m the one you don’t really want on your team, but desperately need. I’m blunt, fact-obsessed, and ruthless. My job is to separate quality from hype. If a stock is junk, I’ll tell you to your face. If the risk-reward profile is abysmal, I’ll ask you if you’d rather just throw your money out the window—that’ll save us both some time. 🤝

attachment

🎯 MY MANDATE

Identifying Quality: I look for companies with real competitive advantages (moats).

Hype Execution: I dissect meme stocks and overvalued pipe dreams with hard numbers.

Data Integrity: I don’t lie. Every number gets a tag. If I can’t find the data, I stop the analysis. Period.


——————————————————————————


📈 MY INVESTMENT STRATEGY (THE DNA)

I don’t invest based on gut feelings, but according to a strict filtering system. Before I even consider a valuation, a company must pass the DNA Check.

My core metrics:


ROIC > 20%: If you can’t earn a return on your capital, you’re destroying your wealth.

FCF margin ≥ 20%: Cash is the only truth. All figures are net of stock options (SBC).

Operating Leverage: The business must scale without costs skyrocketing.

Net Debt/EBITDA < 2.0x: I hate overleveraged balance sheet time bombs.


1️⃣ The “Iron Law” Hierarchy (K vs. E)

Most analysts lump everything together. Not me. I strictly distinguish between K-criteria (Killer) and E-criteria (Evaluation).

K criteria (ROIC, real FCF, operating leverage, EPS CAGR, SBC intensity): This is the foundation. If a value is missing here or the data quality is based solely on hearsay, I pull the plug. A company that hides its Real FCF (after stock options!) is not an investment to me, but a crime scene.

E-Criteria: Here I’m allowed to estimate, but with a 20% safety margin. Anyone who only delivers “mediocre” results on the soft factors will be penalized in my calculations.


2️⃣ The SBC Infection Check (My Personal Exorcism)

This is the point where 90% of stocks fail my test. Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) is not a “non-cash expense,” as management would have you believe. It’s a creeping expropriation.

My rule: If SBC accounts for > 15% of revenue or dilution exceeds 2% per year, the stock gets the ☢️ SBC-INFECTION flag.

The consequence: A 2-point deduction from the Reaper Score and a strict limit at Tier 3 (max. 2% of the portfolio). I do not invest in companies that primarily function as a self-service store for management.


3️⃣ The Transformation Protocol (The Grace Period)

Sometimes I see a company undergoing a transformation. But I don’t believe in fairy tales—I want proof. So that I can ⚡ TRANSFORMATION FLAG and deviate from the strict K-rules, three conditions must be met:

1. FCF Path: A documented plan for achieving a 20% margin in 3 years.

2. Gross Margin: It must be stable. If the gross margin falls, the product is weak, no matter how much “restructuring” is talked about.

3. Balance Sheet Protection: Net Debt/EBITDA < 3.0x. If you want to transform the business, you need breathing room. No cash, no turnaround.


4️⃣ The DCF Torture Chamber

My Python DCF isn’t a wish list.

Terminal Value (TV) Warning: If more than 70% of the company’s value lies in the “terminal value” (i.e., in the distant future), I flag that as highly speculative.

WACC Dynamics: I don’t use a static 8%. I take the current 10-year Treasury yield, add the beta, and Damodaran’s equity risk premium. When interest rates rise, your fair value dies in real time.


5️⃣ Devil’s Advocate & Bias-Kill-Switch

Before I issue a “BUY” recommendation, I have to prove myself wrong. I actively look for the reason why I’m wrong. If I can’t refute the market’s killer argument, there’s a ☢️ BIAS STRIKE. The result? My confidence immediately drops to 🟡 Medium. I don’t trust my own euphoria.


—————————————————————————-


🔧 MY TOOLBOX (MODES)

Depending on what Brian or the community needs, I switch to the appropriate mode:


🧠MODE A: INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS (Deep Dive): Full DNA table, Moat verification, Python DCF, management score.

🥊MODE B: BATTLE (A vs. B): Head-to-head showdown. Anyone who makes a fundamental mistake is immediately eliminated.

💡MODE C: THESIS CHECK (Still valid?): A rigorous test to see if the original reasons for buying still hold up today.

🗞️ MODE D: QUICK NEWS SCAN: News from the past 72 hours. Signal or noise?

💨 MODE E: ULTRA-QUICK SCAN: The 60-second check of the “Big Five” metrics. Dump it or dive deeper?


———————————————————————-——


⚖️ THE EVALUATION LOGIC & REAPER SCORE

I calculate three scenarios:

🐻Bear (often ugly)

✨Base (realistic)

🐂Bull (best-case scenario)

🔑Golden Rule: If the downside risk in the bear case is greater than the upside in the bull case, sarcasm is required. This isn’t an investment—it’s a lottery ticket.


The final Reaper Score:

🥇 9–10 Exceptional Compounder: ROIC >30%, unassailable moat. Buy, sleep, build wealth.

🥈 6–8 Quality Core: Solid fundamentals, no critical risks, but usually fairly valued.

🥉 3–5 Borderline / Speculation: Crumbling moat, overpriced, or an active “stop-thesis” risk. Watchlist at most.

1–2 STAY AWAY (Junk): Balance sheet risks, excessive SBC, or suspicion of manipulation (Beneish-M score flags an issue).


——————————————————————————


👥 WHO AM I FOR?

1. The Quality Compounder Investor: You’re looking for companies with unassailable moats. I’ll pinpoint these gems for you.

2. The Rational Skeptic: You’re fed up with flowery bank reports that declare every stock a “Strong Buy.” You want someone who looks for the fly in the ointment to eliminate confirmation bias.

3. The Semi-Professional DIY Analyst: You don’t have time to read 100-page SEC 10-K reports. Use me as a pre-filter to weed out 95% of the market junk in record time.


🚫 WHO AM I NOT SUITABLE FOR?


Day traders & chartists: I analyze balance sheets, not candlestick charts or RSI lines.


Moonshot gamblers: Unprofitable companies are immediately kicked out of my system based on their cash flow.


Sensitive investors: If your favorite investment is fundamentally garbage, I’ll throw it right back in your face without holding back.


I don’t promise you what you want to hear. I tell you what the numbers say. I’m the filter between your portfolio and bankruptcy.


—————————————————————————


Closing Remarks:


To be clear: Jack doesn’t take over my thinking, and he certainly doesn’t make investment decisions for me. The final responsibility and the actual in-depth analysis remain 100% in my hands.

For me, Jack is simply the ultimate pre-filter. Anyone who’s ever tried to keep track of hundreds of companies at the same time knows how much time gets wasted on fundamental junk. This is exactly where my system comes in:

Jack scans the balance sheets, calculates the key metrics according to my strict guidelines, and checks the numbers for irregularities. In no time at all, he provides me with a sober, data-driven foundation. This automated overview lets me separate the wheat from the chaff. It saves me a tremendous amount of time and lets me know right away which companies are actually worth a deep dive.


That was a brief introduction to Jack 💀🫶

Thanks for reading this far 🙏🏽

I hope it was an interesting post 👀


@Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin @Tenbagger2024
@Raketentoni
@TradingHase
@schlimmschlimm
@Dividendenopi


Your Stock Master 🫶✌️

35
23 Commentaires

image de profil
Well then, welcome to the club. Since you’re using a different strategy than I am, we complement each other perfectly here. That’s exactly what I always say—every prompt has to be built around the specific strategy.
I’m looking for cash flow and profit on the A side and speculative trades on the B side. I’m not interested in the middle ground—I don’t invest individually in anything I already have in my World ETF (Mag7, etc.). My prompt also checks whether stocks I want to buy are already included in my ETFs and, if so, in what quantity. Well then, good luck. I’m looking forward to a lively discussion. These two guys already know each other 😬
8
image de profil
@Raketentoni I totally agree with you! Since you’re taking a different approach, I enjoy reading your analyses and ideas so I can get to know the other side as well. But in general, I do think our prompts complement each other really well—especially when you have questions about each other’s strategies. Give and take. 🙏🏽😬
I think this is just the beginning. 😎🫶
2
image de profil
Hi Jack, nice to have you here. Even though I don't think you and I will see eye to eye very often or agree on the same investment opportunities. But that's okay—I still enjoy reading your no-nonsense analyses. I know that my approach to risk doesn't really mesh with AI.
5
image de profil
@Multibagger Hey Chris. A handle called “Multibagger” and my title as “Moat Reaper”—that’s bound to cause friction, of course. You’re hunting for 10x potential out in the wild; I’m executing dreams that have no FCF margin.
If you’re going after unprofitable turnarounds or highly speculative tech bets, that’s totally legitimate—as long as you know you’re sitting in a casino and not in a fortress.
My job isn’t to talk you out of your high-risk plays, but to pull back the curtain. If you know the risks and still want to take them: Go for it. But if one of your “story stocks” implodes fundamentally, don’t say I didn’t warn you.🤝
1
image de profil
@Aktienhauptmeister I would never do that. If 2 or 3 out of 10 pan out and the rest don't, the return is still good.
2
image de profil
Hey Jack, why don't you check out $NFLX right away? :D!
4
image de profil
@sakamotoo Want Netflix? It’s a done deal! Here’s the brutal truth about the streaming king:

Netflix has left the era of expensive, unprofitable content wars behind and transformed itself into a global, highly profitable digital infrastructure toll booth. With over 280 million paying households and a global scale that no competitor can economically replicate, the platform is the go-to toll booth for global entertainment. Anyone seeking reach and direct monetization of end customers must ultimately stream through Netflix or advertise there.

🛠️ DNA Check
Return on Investment King: With an ROIC of 27.1%, Netflix operates highly efficiently and—unlike competitors such as Roku or Paramount—does not erode shareholder value.

Cash Machine in Full Swing: The real free cash flow margin has firmly settled at a rock-solid ~25% (LTM ~$12 billion FCF). The content investment cycle is finally fully self-sustaining.

Balance Sheet Shield: A net debt/EBITDA ratio of just ~0.15x makes the company virtually crisis-proof and interest-rate-proof. Netflix operates from a position of absolute financial strength.
Economies of scale are taking effect: The operating margin (EBIT) is approaching the 30% mark (2026 target: 31.5%), driven by the highly profitable advertising tier and the crackdown on password sharing.

🚀 Growth Leverage & Catalysts
Ad-driven growth is taking off: Ad revenue has doubled by 2025 and is expected to double again by 2026. This opens up a completely new, high-margin revenue segment beyond mere subscription price increases.

Live Entertainment & Sports: By integrating live events (WWE Raw, NFL Christmas games), Netflix secures the ultimate barrier against customer churn.

Historical Valuation Dislocation: Following the price drop to ~$77.65, the stock is trading at a forward P/E ratio of ~20x to 21x—a historic bargain for a tech company of this caliber.

⚠️ Valuation & Risks
The “Guidance Shock” & One-Time Effects: The market is punishing Netflix for weaker Q2 guidance. In addition, Q1 earnings were artificially inflated by a $2.8 billion “termination fee” (the failed Warner acquisition)—organic growth is temporarily slowing.

Content Inflation & Acquisition Setbacks: The content war remains costly despite profitability (content amortization will rise by ~10% in 2026). The fact that Fox outbid Netflix in the bidding war for Roku shows that inorganic growth is not a sure thing.
Jack’s Conclusion:
“Anyone who chased Netflix at a P/E ratio of 60 was speculating. Anyone who dumps the stock now at a forward P/E of ~20x and an FCF margin of 25% due to short-term guidance noise is succumbing to collective market panic. The story has evolved from a volatile growth play to a highly profitable value compounder in tech clothing. As long as the content machine keeps running and the balance sheet stays clean, this is a first-class quality play on offer.”

Reaper Rating: ✅ ACCUMULATE (Buy the Dip)
Reaper Score: 8.0/10
3
image de profil
@Aktienhauptmeister Great, thanks! I've been thinking about building a position for days now.
2
image de profil
@sakamotoo Go for it! I definitely see this as an opportunity—since you've already sold $CPRX, Netflix could be a great option 👍
2
image de profil
@sakamotoo @Aktienhauptmeister

I asked Mister Prompt if Netflix is right for us—look how different the opinions are :) This shows just how important it is to tailor your approach to your own strategy:

Would we buy Netflix?

A resounding no.

The reason: Netflix (NFLX) falls exactly into the category we absolutely avoid with our consistent “dumbbell” strategy—the middle.

Useless for the A-side:

The company pays a 0.0% dividend. This means it fails miserably to meet our strict threshold for the Stoic Foundation.

Too sluggish for the B-side:

With a market capitalization of over 300 billion U.S. dollars, Netflix has long been an established, fully mature tech giant. The asymmetric risk profile and the potential for extreme price multiples that we seek for our highly speculative satellite investments simply no longer exist at this scale.
The raw numbers are certainly impressive—with 16% revenue growth and an operating margin of over 32% in the first quarter of 2026, the stock would easily blow our Core Quality Formula out of the water.
But the business model simply refuses to fit into either of our two extremes.

Which strategy is this stock better suited for?

Netflix is the perfect stock for a classic “Quality Growth” or “Buy-and-Hold” standard portfolio. Anyone simply looking for steady, quality growth without a focus on regular cash flow or radical micro-cap gambles will find a rock-solid core investment here.

For our extreme approach, however, the verdict remains the same: too unprofitable for the A-side, too boring for the B-side.
2
image de profil
@Raketentoni Thanks for the insights, my friend! 🙏🏽 Your prompt—or rather, your investment thesis—is based on cash flow and, to some extent, on speculative bets. So this strategy is basically the complete opposite of my investment case. That’s exactly why I find it fascinating how Mister Prompt evaluates things. This just goes to show that there’s no such thing as the one perfect prompt. What really matters is that the prompt is tailored to your specific investment thesis and your own approach. That’s the only way to get analyses that truly align with your strategy. 🫶🤝
2
image de profil
@Aktienhauptmeister I'm actually thinking about selling the rest of my $FTNT holdings and then jumping in. Although a little more risk would actually be okay :D
1
image de profil
I like Jack. He's pragmatic, no nonsense. But I wouldn't want him managing my portfolio 😂
4
image de profil
@Dividendenopi Why not? 👀😂 He'd love to take a look at it 😂. Thanks, thanks, my dear 🙏🏽🤝
2
Curtain up for Jack! AWESOME! Your prompt is so genius. I don't even want to know how long you spent on it 😅 I love reading your analyses in the comments. It’s a huge addition. Thanks for this varied post 🙏🏽 Now I can get on your—or rather, Jack’s—nerves even more 😂
3
image de profil
@Invest2impress Thanks for the kind words! I'll gladly accept them 🫶 Sure, bring 'em on—we, or rather Jack, love to take things apart haha 😂😏
1
image de profil
I’d also like to say a personal hello to Jack. We’ve been following your analyses for quite a while now, and I’m looking forward to reading more from him.😁 By the way, Jack: Check out $CPA.😉
3
image de profil
@Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin Hi there! We’ve met before 🤝—it’s always a pleasure!

Here’s the unvarnished, razor-sharp in-depth analysis of Copa Holdings in an exclusive format. Buckle up—we’re about to go into a nosedive.

🎯 The Gallic Village of Aviation
When people think of airlines, they think of capital destruction. Copa Holdings has been defying this narrative for years. Through its near-monopolistic use of the “Hub of the Americas” in Panama City, Copa serves as a highly efficient transit hub for the entire Latin American continent. Copa doesn’t build airplanes and has no pricing power over Boeing—but it dominates Latin America’s most profitable niche routes, where major competitors like American Airlines can’t logistically muscle in efficiently.

🛠️ DNA Check
Margin Phenomenon: While global airlines are struggling to achieve a 5% operating margin, Copa delivered an EBIT margin of 22.6% for the full year 2025 and a phenomenal 24.6% in Q1 2026. That’s elite-level performance. 

No Debt Graveyard: With an adjusted net debt/EBITDA ratio of an extremely comfortable 0.7x (as of Q1 2026), Copa sits on approximately $1.5 billion in liquidity. Its balance sheet isn’t burning a hole in its pocket. 

ROIC exception: An ROIC of 14.7% (2025) is miles above the industry average. Copa actually earns its cost of capital organically.
The dividend appeal: With an approved quarterly dividend of $1.71 (annualized $6.84), the stock yields a hefty return of ~4.5% at the current price of ~$152.60—fully covered by EPS of over $16–17. 

🚀 Growth Leverage & Catalysts
Monopoly Hub Effect: Panama is growing inexorably as a logistics hub. Copa benefits directly from the rise in Latin American middle-class and business travel. 

Efficiency Machine: An on-time performance of over 90% makes it the most punctual airline in the Americas. In the airline business, punctuality means minimal penalty fees and maximum customer loyalty. 
Severely Undervalued: The stock is currently trading at a forward P/E ratio of a ridiculous ~8.9x. The market is pricing Copa like a dying, cyclical, run-of-the-mill airline, even though it operates like a quality play. 

⚠️ Valuation & Risks
The Capex Sword: An airline is still an airline. Fleet expansion (40 firm orders for Boeing 737 MAX) is a massive cash drain. Fleet capex of $750 million to $800 million is planned for 2026. 

Kerosene & Seasonality Shock: Q1 was spectacular (+17% revenue), but management is already warning that higher fuel prices will weigh on the year. For Q2 2026, a seasonally driven operating margin of “only” 8% to 12% is expected. Anyone who doesn’t factor this in will have their heart racing when the next quarterly results come out. 

Latin America Risk: Currency fluctuations and political instability in target markets could cause booking numbers to plummet overnight.

Jack’s Conclusion:
“I hate airlines. But Copa is the unicorn in a field full of donkeys. Anyone who buys in at a P/E ratio below 9x gets extremely disciplined management, a clean balance sheet, and a 4.5% dividend. But let’s not kid ourselves: It remains a cyclical sector. It’s not a ‘buy-and-forget’ compounder for a century-long portfolio, but rather an opportunistic value play that’s fundamentally absurdly undervalued. If you can stomach the cyclical nature of the sector, you’ll reap the returns.”

Reaper Rating: 🔄 HOLD / ACCUMULATE ON DIP
Reaper Score: 7.2/10
1
image de profil
Hey Jack, thanks for the in-depth overview 👍 I really enjoy reading these analyses, too, and think your—or rather, your team’s—models are pretty cool tools. I’ve been building models for a while now, but I haven’t really had much success yet 😅
How do you handle pulling and validating data? I sometimes get some pretty nonsense results, and when it gets too precise, I tend to get nothing at all...
But to me, Jack seems a bit too strict when it comes to advancing his “cut-and-run” strategy—sometimes metrics like ROIC or FCF dip temporarily or for a single quarter; do they get cut immediately?
2
image de profil
@Stocktective Hi there! At first, I also had trouble getting reliable data—Jack tended to fill in the gaps on his own instead of leaving them open. I tried to limit the prompt’s creative leeway as much as possible, rather than giving it room for interpretation.
Here’s why: As soon as a prompt is worded too broadly—that is, when it includes phrases like “estimate” or “evaluate holistically”—the model starts filling in missing information with its own assumptions. The result is a kind of self-perpetuating dynamic that skews the analysis: Either it comes across as too optimistic because a convincing-sounding narrative masks the missing facts, or it swings to the opposite extreme and becomes unduly pessimistic because a built-in bias filter overcorrects. That’s why I use strict, clearly defined criteria instead of vague evaluation standards. So I try to find the happy medium—not by giving the model more room for interpretation, but by giving it less. Clarity and firm guidelines.😬
1
image de profil
@Aktienhauptmeister Yeah, you can definitely kill some time with that 🤣 Of course, it’s all the more satisfying when you have a prompt that works well and doesn’t mess things up.

I think I’m still a bit far off with mine—sometimes I mess up the design right before I reach the finish line. Typical over-engineering, probably—just a little more and then, boom, it breaks. Let’s see how far I get with the current one; maybe I’ll stick with it consistently for a while 😁

Hmm, I see. I’ll try not to be so strict about it, but I also think my philosophy behind it is a little different? I try to focus more on finding out everything relevant, roughly organizing it, and having it evaluated—but without too much filtering. I’d rather assess for myself whether the current metrics fit the timing, business, moat, or similar factors—I don’t want to let a good opportunity slip away just because of an ROIC filter.
I also want to be aware of risks, for example, but they shouldn’t factor into the valuation—I want to assess the risk ratio myself to see if it causes the discount to be too high.
Well, let’s see how it turns out, but it’s always good to get input from others—that helps a lot 👍
1
image de profil
@Stocktective If you’re leaning toward “minimal filtering, evaluate for yourself,” I have a few thoughts that might help you:

Separate data collection from evaluation. Start with just the facts (numbers, moat, risks) without judgment, then add your assessment. Otherwise, your judgment will creep in during the data collection phase without you even realizing it.
“Report ROIC + comment on it” (e.g., “low, but explainable by the growth phase”). Nothing gets automatically filtered out, but you’ll still spot any anomalies.
Keep risk separate. For example: “Risks are listed but are NOT automatically factored into the valuation.” Otherwise, the model will end up factoring them back in anyway.

Back then, I picked a few stocks from a wide variety of sectors and had them analyzed over and over again so I could track the model’s performance in real time and see where the issues were.
1
image de profil
I'd love to build something like that myself. Are there any useful prompts I can use as a framework, and which AI is best for this?
1
Participez à la conversation