1Sem.·

AI doesn't need less software, it needs more! But ...

I've picked up a few really exciting thoughts over the last 2-3 days that I wanted to share. The current software sale is part of a rotation that has been going on for a while now


The thesis: HALO instead of Asset Light 😇 Josh Brown (The Compound) put it aptly: for years, "asset light" (software, data, consulting) was the non plus ultra. High margins, no physical ballast. Today, that's exactly the risk. If your product consists only of information, an LLM can replicate it. The flight is now into HALO (Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence) - companies that own "real" things that can't just be prompted away.


SAAS - Is the "per seat" model dead?

Nate (super exciting guy) posits the thesis: AI needs software. AI doesn't just replace $CRM (-0,08 %) or $SAP (-0,29 %) & CO. That's nonsense. But that's what SaaS is struggling with. AI replaces people >>> The "per seat" business model, the non-plus-ultra of the SaaS world, is faltering.


Interesting sectors according to Dan Ives (Sell Side - has funds himself, bias!!!)


Enterprise AI: Palantir ($PLTR (-0,84 %))

"The first address" for AI applications in government and companies. He sees the path to a trillion-dollar valuation here.


Cybersecurity: CrowdStrike $CRWD (+0,46 %) & Palo Alto $PANW (-0,02 %)

AI makes attacks more dangerous, so every company needs better defenses.


Data layer: Snowflake $SNOW (+0,46 %) & MongoDB $MDB (+0,23 %)

Before an AI can work, the data must be cleanly structured. These companies are the "garbage collection and sorting system" for AI data.


Platform giants: Microsoft $MSFT (+0,23 %) & Salesforce $CRM (-0,08 %) or $SAP (-0,29 %)

He sees Salesforce as massively undervalued (P/E ratio of approx. 15), as the market is ignoring the potential of "Agentforce" (AI agents).


AI models are worthless without context. The big SaaS players are sitting on the companies' historical data. Whoever has the data controls the AI agents that access it. That's the reason why, according to Ives, they are not simply "prompted away".


Sources:

Okay Computer Podcast (Dan Ives / Dan Nathan)

The 200-line prompt that killed $285B (NoteGPT/Anthropic Analysis)

What Are Your Thoughts / Animal Spirits (Josh Brown & Michael Batnick)

11
3 Commentaires

image de profil
I spoke to a managing director of a larger software company yesterday and our exchange was similar.
It can be assumed that the number of software developers is shrinking on the one hand, but the number of classicAm users is also shrinking. New billing models need to be developed here.
3
image de profil
Don't forget the infrastructure. $SU (I have one myself), Eaton, Vertiv, Siemens (Energy) etc.

I agree about Enterprise AI with Palantir. That's why I have it too. Big head start.

Platform too. Even Microsoft in the portfolio.

The other sectors also conclusive. I have no opinion or in-depth knowledge of specific companies.
1
image de profil
@NoBobble In a podcast, an analyst was asked about the highest conviction: He named electricity infrastructure as his highest conviction, because de-globalization in the USA will come in any case.

According to this source, the power grid has been flat for the last 20 years in terms of capacity!!!! So no increase in power!
Participez à la conversation