World Quality Aristocrats vs All others

K · 2025-07-12T08:52:17.630631Z

I took a few interesting screenshots comparing $QDEV with other popular indexes $IWDA , $CSPX , $FGEQ and $VWRL It is about the annualized 10-year total return (price + dividends) World Quality Aristocrats: ≈15% MSCI World: ≈11% S&P500: ≈13% FTSE All-World: ≈10% Fidelity: ≈11%

Tenbagger2024@Tenbagger2024

3Sem.

What bothers me is the high Apple weighting.
But fortunately Tesla is not included.

•

2

•

TotallyLost@TotallyLost

3Sem.

@Tenbagger2024 Fun fact: Tesla is NOT included in any ETF that tracks the quality factor, not even in any value ETF.

Believe me, I currently have over 9 different ETFs and actively managed funds where Tesla is included in the investment universe and not a single one is invested in Tesla. Not even in the momentum strategies. 😅

•

3

•

TotallyLost@TotallyLost

3Sem.

I have just seen that my previous statement is not quite correct... thanks to the 3xGTAA from @Epi I have a 3x QQQ in my portfolio... thanks @Epi you have brought $TSLA into my portfolio.
And that 3x leveraged. 🖕😂🖕

•

6

•

Epi@Epi

3Sem.

@TotallyLost Sorry! 🖕😁✌️

••

K@TechNav

3Sem.

@Tenbagger2024 The Apple weighting displayed here at getquin is incorrect.

Apple is only weighted at 4.4% in the ETF, i.e. the 8th largest position.

https://www.ssga.com/fr/en_gb/intermediary/etfs/spdr-sp-developed-quality-aristocrats-ucits-etf-acc-qdev-gy

•

1

•

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

3Sem.

@TotallyLost A small Tesla short could compensate for this 🤥

•

2

•

BamBamInvest@BamBamInvest

3Sem.

Should still be relatively small with 30 million, is there also a bigger brother of ishares ? 😁 How did you track the performance, it shouldn't have been around for long (2024)? Or is there an index that you used? (I haven't done much research now) 😁

•

1

•

K@TechNav

3Sem.

@BamBamInvest The index was only recently launched (end of 2024). StateStreet's ETF is currently the only one that tracks it and is still relatively small.

The performance can be viewed retrospectively directly from the index provider S&P Global, not via the ETF.

•

1

•

BamBamInvest@BamBamInvest

3Sem.

@TechNav thanks for the info, sounds exciting 👍.

••

TotallyLost@TotallyLost

3Sem.

@Iwamoto I actually have puts at 200 and 100$ that expire at the end of 2026. 😁

•

2

•

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

3Sem.

@TotallyLost rationally speaking, it should work

••

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

3Sem.

Thank you :)

••

K@TechNav

3Sem.

@Iwamoto I have corrected 😜

•

1

•

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

3Sem.

@TechNav Me too 🤪

•

1

•

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

3Sem.

Since its launch, it has even beaten my $EQQQ. 😮 (of course, this is too short a period to consider)

•

1

•

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

3Sem.

@TechNav How did you actually find this ETF?

••

K@TechNav

2Sem.

@Iwamoto I became aware of the index through news on the S&P website and then took a closer look at it. The methodology convinced me, and to be honest I am not bothered by State street's current low fund volume. I've been investing via DCA since January and completely liquidated my Nasdaq in February and reallocated into it. I then added a larger tranche during the 🍊crisis in April. This world and its US brother are now my largest positions. I am also convinced that they will increase in volume in the coming years.

•

1

•

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

2Sem.

@TechNav I'm thinking about adding it to my portfolio. There are overlaps again, but I like the approach very much. May I ask why you took both and not just the global one?

•

1

•

K@TechNav

2Sem.

@Iwamoto I think it's a good decision. For two reasons: The US performs better in the long term (16.6% per year over the last 10 years) and I want to consciously keep my US exposure above 70%.

••

TotallyLost@TotallyLost

3Sem.

@TechNav can you explain briefly and concisely what criteria are used to select the companies... I'm too lazy to look up the methodology of the index right now. 😅

••

K@TechNav

3Sem.

@TotallyLost they must have generated positive cash flow over 10 years.
Large FCF margin % and large ROIC %.

Explained simply here:
https://www.ssga.com/fr/en_gb/intermediary/insights/weekly-etf-brief-17-12-2024

•

4

•

Kate🦋@Iwamoto

3Sem.

@Stullen-Portfolio A very interesting ETF, in my opinion. What is your opinion?

••

Stulle 🥪@Stullen-Portfolio

2Sem.

@Iwamoto
I see it exactly the same way as you, dear Kate. ✅ Very interesting 🤜🏻🤛🏻 Or actually very, very, very interesting ✌️🤙
...I like concepts like this - you're quite right. Thank you so much for tagging me.

I'll take a closer look...also to see if it could become a building block in the Stullen portfolio 🤷🍀😎

Greetings
🥪

•

2

•

Thesaurus@Thesaurus

3Sem.

comparing the annualized return of a developed country with an All World makes no sense in my opinion.

Of course the ETF with 2000 fewer positions has a higher beta and you are simply rewarded for the higher risk.

••

K@TechNav

3Sem.

@Thesaurus I have compared the popular ETFs that many here have in their portfolio (e.g. also SP500 which is not a world ETF).

If you like you can only look at $IWDA which has only developed countries and +1500 positions for comparison.

•

1

•

Jason M.@JasonMcMillen

2Sem.

@TechNav is practically not a global ETF, but Meta, for example, generates more turnover worldwide than within America. Microsoft is also such a candidate. It is also questionable whether, in the event of a crash within America, Europe would be better advised despite the scarcity of resources and socialist policies. But everyone has to know for themselves, or even EM. Many All Worlds are 60% American, i.e. overweighted anyway, while some MAG7s are practically more globally active.

•

1

•

K@TechNav

2Sem.

@JasonMcMillen is 59.25% USA and the rest in developed countries from Europe or Japan, Israel, Hong Kong, Australia, etc. For me, that is enough regional diversification. An MSCI world ETF $IWDA has 71% USA. A world quality $IS3Q has 76% USA. Even the FTSE All world $VWRL has 3% more with 62.5% USA.

••

World Quality Aristocrats vs All others 🥊