1J·

World Quality Aristocrats vs All others 🥊

7
24 Commentaires

image de profil
What bothers me is the high Apple weighting.
But fortunately Tesla is not included.
2
image de profil
@Tenbagger2024 Fun fact: Tesla is NOT included in any ETF that tracks the quality factor, not even in any value ETF.

Believe me, I currently have over 9 different ETFs and actively managed funds where Tesla is included in the investment universe and not a single one is invested in Tesla. Not even in the momentum strategies. 😅
3
image de profil
I have just seen that my previous statement is not quite correct... thanks to the 3xGTAA from @Epi I have a 3x QQQ in my portfolio... thanks @Epi you have brought $TSLA into my portfolio.
And that 3x leveraged. 🖕😂🖕
5
image de profil
@TotallyLost Sorry! 🖕😁✌️
image de profil
@Tenbagger2024 The Apple weighting displayed here at getquin is incorrect.

Apple is only weighted at 4.4% in the ETF, i.e. the 8th largest position.

https://www.ssga.com/fr/en_gb/intermediary/etfs/spdr-sp-developed-quality-aristocrats-ucits-etf-acc-qdev-gy
1
image de profil
@TotallyLost A small Tesla short could compensate for this 🤥
2
image de profil
Should still be relatively small with 30 million, is there also a bigger brother of ishares ? 😁 How did you track the performance, it shouldn't have been around for long (2024)? Or is there an index that you used? (I haven't done much research now) 😁
1
image de profil
@BamBamInvest The index was only recently launched (end of 2024). StateStreet's ETF is currently the only one that tracks it and is still relatively small.

The performance can be viewed retrospectively directly from the index provider S&P Global, not via the ETF.
1
image de profil
@TechNav thanks for the info, sounds exciting 👍.
image de profil
@Iwamoto I actually have puts at 200 and 100$ that expire at the end of 2026. 😁
2
image de profil
@TotallyLost rationally speaking, it should work
image de profil
Thank you :)
image de profil
@Iwamoto I have corrected 😜
1
image de profil
@TechNav Me too 🤪
1
image de profil
Since its launch, it has even beaten my $EQQQ. 😮 (of course, this is too short a period to consider)
1
image de profil
@TechNav How did you actually find this ETF?
image de profil
@Iwamoto I became aware of the index through news on the S&P website and then took a closer look at it. The methodology convinced me, and to be honest I am not bothered by State street's current low fund volume. I've been investing via DCA since January and completely liquidated my Nasdaq in February and reallocated into it. I then added a larger tranche during the 🍊crisis in April. This world and its US brother are now my largest positions. I am also convinced that they will increase in volume in the coming years.
1
image de profil
@TechNav can you explain briefly and concisely what criteria are used to select the companies... I'm too lazy to look up the methodology of the index right now. 😅
image de profil
@TotallyLost they must have generated positive cash flow over 10 years.
Large FCF margin % and large ROIC %.

Explained simply here:
https://www.ssga.com/fr/en_gb/intermediary/insights/weekly-etf-brief-17-12-2024
4
image de profil
@Stullen-Portfolio A very interesting ETF, in my opinion. What is your opinion?
image de profil
comparing the annualized return of a developed country with an All World makes no sense in my opinion.

Of course the ETF with 2000 fewer positions has a higher beta and you are simply rewarded for the higher risk.
image de profil
@Thesaurus I have compared the popular ETFs that many here have in their portfolio (e.g. also SP500 which is not a world ETF).

If you like you can only look at $IWDA which has only developed countries and +1500 positions for comparison.
1
image de profil
@TechNav is practically not a global ETF, but Meta, for example, generates more turnover worldwide than within America. Microsoft is also such a candidate. It is also questionable whether, in the event of a crash within America, Europe would be better advised despite the scarcity of resources and socialist policies. But everyone has to know for themselves, or even EM. Many All Worlds are 60% American, i.e. overweighted anyway, while some MAG7s are practically more globally active.
1
image de profil
@JasonMcMillen is 59.25% USA and the rest in developed countries from Europe or Japan, Israel, Hong Kong, Australia, etc. For me, that is enough regional diversification. An MSCI world ETF $IWDA has 71% USA. A world quality $IS3Q has 76% USA. Even the FTSE All world $VWRL has 3% more with 62.5% USA.
Participez à la conversation