Very boring overall, but if that's the way you want it, then it's ok. Do you have any arguments for the individual stocks you mentioned? Why Pepsi, for example? What is the opportunity with Novo? And what is this -99% stock in the end? I also find a digitalization ETF difficult. Especially because the world indices are already mostly tech anyway. So if you want to go the boring route, just go for the classic world ETF, the other stuff doesn't make sense to me. But at 31, you could actually take a bit more risk..... You should only ever invest what you don't need anyway. Or you can do it partly. However, I think it's usually a shame and a waste of time to go for ETFs and dividend stocks, but that's just my opinion.
•
33
•
3Mo
@PikaPika0105 Thank you for your feedback!
I am consciously pursuing a long-term core-satellite strategy:
60% core ETFs, 30% satellites (individual stocks with fundamentals), 10% opportunity satellites
The selection may seem "boring" to some - but that's exactly my goal: stability, diversification and long-term wealth accumulation.
For me, Pepsi is a defensive dividend stock with a strong market position, stable cash flows and high pricing power - that suits my satellite share.
Novo Nordisk is still under review, but I find it exciting (obesity, GLP-1, strong moat).
The digitalization ETF is deliberately staying in - despite the tech component in the MSCI World. It focuses more strongly on future trends and complements my core investment in a targeted manner.
And the -99% share: There is currently nothing in my portfolio in this area, perhaps there was a misunderstanding or transposed figures?
It's okay that you prefer more risk. I prefer to be solid and consistent. I have deliberately limited small "gamble positions" to 10%.
In the end, it's the same as always: everyone has their own strategy - mine is long-term, rational and disciplined.
I am consciously pursuing a long-term core-satellite strategy:
60% core ETFs, 30% satellites (individual stocks with fundamentals), 10% opportunity satellites
The selection may seem "boring" to some - but that's exactly my goal: stability, diversification and long-term wealth accumulation.
For me, Pepsi is a defensive dividend stock with a strong market position, stable cash flows and high pricing power - that suits my satellite share.
Novo Nordisk is still under review, but I find it exciting (obesity, GLP-1, strong moat).
The digitalization ETF is deliberately staying in - despite the tech component in the MSCI World. It focuses more strongly on future trends and complements my core investment in a targeted manner.
And the -99% share: There is currently nothing in my portfolio in this area, perhaps there was a misunderstanding or transposed figures?
It's okay that you prefer more risk. I prefer to be solid and consistent. I have deliberately limited small "gamble positions" to 10%.
In the end, it's the same as always: everyone has their own strategy - mine is long-term, rational and disciplined.
••
••
3Mo
@PikaPika0105 I don't see -99% but +35%. Possibly a display error on your end?
I'll check again but I think it's more of a display error. Have you ever looked at the share?
I'll check again but I think it's more of a display error. Have you ever looked at the share?
••
@Laro Is probably not K33 AB?
••
3Mo
@PikaPika0105 I think I know what the problem is. Have you set your chart to max?
Because when I go to the daily, weekly or monthly chart, I see a plus. I also see a plus for YTD and 1Y.
Because when I go to the daily, weekly or monthly chart, I see a plus. I also see a plus for YTD and 1Y.
••
@Laro so really K33? Yes, I set it to Max to get an overall picture. Has something happened to them or is that not true?
••
3Mo
@PikaPika0105 That's already true. They changed their name at the end of 2024. They were previously listed on the stock exchange under a different name. I just can't think of it at the moment.
And when I saw them, I thought €4 as "play money" for 234 shares wouldn't hurt when they were gone 😅.
That's why I'm not adding any more, just letting it run and seeing what happens. As you can see, the price has risen considerably in the last week.
That's more in the category of if it works it's great, if it backfires it's just that 😅.
And when I saw them, I thought €4 as "play money" for 234 shares wouldn't hurt when they were gone 😅.
That's why I'm not adding any more, just letting it run and seeing what happens. As you can see, the price has risen considerably in the last week.
That's more in the category of if it works it's great, if it backfires it's just that 😅.
••
@Laro but what's the story behind it? I think you can leave €4 alone. Even if they increase a hundredfold, you only have €400.
••
@PikaPika0105 I don't buy anything under €50.
For €4, I'd rather treat myself to a drink in the sun and enjoy life.
I'm also with you on the willingness to take risks.
But that's the exciting thing about how differently people invest their money or how willing they are to take risks.
For €4, I'd rather treat myself to a drink in the sun and enjoy life.
I'm also with you on the willingness to take risks.
But that's the exciting thing about how differently people invest their money or how willing they are to take risks.
••