2Année
Step 6 is absolutely unnecessary, so set 6!
And for everything else: far too serious!
But thanks for your contribution to the community. 🥴🥸 Kiss on the donkey nut!
And for everything else: far too serious!
But thanks for your contribution to the community. 🥴🥸 Kiss on the donkey nut!
••
@InvestmentPapa I actually see it differently.
1) Absolute amounts arouse greater interest in the community, precisely in order to compare the thickness of the eggs. At least that's my assumption, without having a scientific study to back it up.
2) It makes a difference whether I have 3,000 positions in my portfolio with an equivalent value of 10k or 10 euros each
3) Absolute figures are easier to interpret on GetQuin. With absolute figures it is relatively easy to see the weighting. With relative numbers you have to click additionally for the weighting.
All in all, absolute numbers should attract more feedback, which is why I would still recommend absolute numbers.
1) Absolute amounts arouse greater interest in the community, precisely in order to compare the thickness of the eggs. At least that's my assumption, without having a scientific study to back it up.
2) It makes a difference whether I have 3,000 positions in my portfolio with an equivalent value of 10k or 10 euros each
3) Absolute figures are easier to interpret on GetQuin. With absolute figures it is relatively easy to see the weighting. With relative numbers you have to click additionally for the weighting.
All in all, absolute numbers should attract more feedback, which is why I would still recommend absolute numbers.
•
22
•2Année
@DonkeyInvestor To 2. it does not. Because other investments (outside of Geqtuin) are not taken into account, real estate (which the person presenting the portfolio may not want to disclose) or life circumstances (which should also not be disclosed) are unknown. Pure strategy and risk considerations do not require absolute figures. For gold donkeys, €100 per position may be a lot, but for crypto donkeys the fun only starts at €5k per position. So if I look at the portfolio allocation as an outsider, I can very well say whether 90% Bitcoin in a defensively managed portfolio is too much. However, I cannot say that 10k Bitcoin is too much for a portfolio value of 100k, but I can say that 10% in BTC can provide a return in a defensively oriented portfolio, but should not be weighted higher. So the 10k is absolutely irrelevant.
As for your curiosity... Donkeys and ungulates are flight animals, so no curiosity! They do run! When they're not bucking. 😛
The argument about the number of positions is the only one I can subscribe to. But even that's debatable in times of savings plans.
As for your curiosity... Donkeys and ungulates are flight animals, so no curiosity! They do run! When they're not bucking. 😛
The argument about the number of positions is the only one I can subscribe to. But even that's debatable in times of savings plans.
••
@InvestmentPapa With 2. it was precisely about the number of positions. Every share requires continuous engagement with the company. It makes a difference whether I spend 2 hours every week on a company in which I have invested 10k or whether I only have 10 euros in it. Of course, the size of a position is irrelevant for the portfolio itself as long as you know the ratio. However, in order to give the questioner holistic feedback, it is important to look at more than just the portfolio. At least that's my aim.
••
2Année
@DonkeyInvestor Well, the cost/benefit/time ratio should be made clear to everyone at the beginning. But who are we to judge whether someone earns €1 an hour or €100? What do some people always say here? This is my hobby. And time can also cost money... I agree with you on whether that is logical, of course, and I repeat this myself with portfolios where I see absolute values and assess them... but again, argumentatively:
For one person, positions with €1000 are just as uninteresting to maintain and track as someone with a €100 position might spend the whole day on fundamental analysis and 10-year forward fair value analysis... Albert once said: "Time is relative." That fits quite well here. ☺️
Holistic feedback also sounds a bit esoteric.😇😅
For one person, positions with €1000 are just as uninteresting to maintain and track as someone with a €100 position might spend the whole day on fundamental analysis and 10-year forward fair value analysis... Albert once said: "Time is relative." That fits quite well here. ☺️
Holistic feedback also sounds a bit esoteric.😇😅
•
11
•@InvestmentPapa The esoteric ending almost cost you a thumbs up. But today I'm in a merciful mood. From tomorrow it's back to giving care and living longer!
••
2Année
••
@Kundenservice Why do I actually see more helpful information, such as the percentage distribution of assets, when I click directly on a profile than in a portfolio feedback with relative values?
••
@DonkeyInvestor You can also see the relative distribution via the portfolio feedback by scrolling down a little.
Both in the web app and in the mobile app.
Both in the web app and in the mobile app.
••
@Kundenservice but I don't want to scroll down
••
@DonkeyInvestor Then you need a larger screen.😉
•
11
•