1Année·

Roast me



The shares were except $AKH (+3,91 %) largely bought at the end of 2021 and are held, TA I learned there and applied only to short trades....stupidity.


Part of the investment thesis has also always been that hype potential exists in the stocks.

That's why lithium recycling $AMY (-1,94 %) , "green" lithium mining $VUL (+1,74 %) , $ACC (+3,87 %) speaks for itself, etc.

Cosmos is a bet on the crypto hype.


Jewelery are 2 watches (high 3 digits)


The call has already been sold, but since Scalable doesn't update if nothing new is bought it is still in there.

I'm still studying, returns are in the background for me while studying, learnings for afterwards are the goal; as well as >4% a year.


My complete intention and purchase times of the pile that calls itself depot can be found here:

https://app.getquin.com/activity/lfIsHTKEvm




attachment
Jetez un coup d'œil à mon Tableau de bord maintenant !
9
72 Commentaires

image de profil
Polygon is one of your high performers in percentage terms, I can save myself the roasting, your portfolio does that by itself 😅
24
image de profil
@RoronoaZoro leave him alone 😅
1
image de profil
@RoronoaZoro poa that was hard
1
image de profil
@Koenigmidas As long as you do not wear a helmet I let me say anything here 😂
1
image de profil
Not necessary to roast you. You already do that quite well yourself with the depot 😘
10
image de profil
@DonkeyInvestor YOU WILL ALL SEE me go broke
4
image de profil
@leveragegrinding Just like Silicon Vally Bank
image de profil
@Stewie no I will not let myself be bought
image de profil
@leveragegrinding Stay Strong
image de profil
1Année
When I was young, I also wanted to get rich quickly with shares... Today, I am smarter and try to invest modestly and consciously.
7
image de profil
@GHF good boy
3
image de profil
@GHF i never wanted to get rich quick with stocks
1
image de profil
I've been around for some time and @leveragegrinding is one of the biggest puzzles on gq for me. Never was the potency of the postings and depot success further apart. I think you are a kind of Elon Musk who has to fail before he can really take off. Here is an appropriate quote: "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that don't work." Thomas A. Edison
7
image de profil
@TopperHarley my excuse is: there's always a bit of luck involved. I don't have that I'll do it until I don't need luck anymore, I don't care
2
image de profil
For so much opinion in other portfolio roasts very little idea as I see😉 Joking aside, to each his own 👍
4
image de profil
@NZFinance 🙃 Would rather call it alternative search But is probably more of an excuse
1
image de profil
So your depot looks like mine, only my green stuff is greener and your red stuff is redder💀
3
image de profil
Well, what can I say. My strategy looks different, but I'm not a student anymore 😉 Assuming that as a student your absolute numbers are not quite so high, then you can not burn as much in young years, as you can learn for your stock market life. And one thing you seem to have learned already, all-in is not the way to go. 31% cash is already a good basis to take advantage of upcoming bargains 👍
2
image de profil
No $UKW 😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒🙂🙃🙃😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒
1
image de profil
@Der_Dividenden_Monteur yes such a trash not even I buy
image de profil
@Kundenservice can you ban Moritz for a week for lese majeste?
1
image de profil
@Der_Dividenden_Monteur hey let that I get 2 notifications 😂
1
image de profil
So how do you get to Aker and Vulcan? 😄
1
image de profil
@Hannes_SK Vulcan I find incredibly exciting in the future because green lithium in Germany and am but because of the valuation only with a smaller sum pure. Was stupid. today I know; in downward trend is not invested. and ACC will boom, provided that they have quickly enough reached a large scale, otherwise they will remain only small market participant. Aker Horizon belongs to ACC to 50% and they have some other exciting investments.
image de profil
@leveragegrinding
Very speculative on the way, my dear friend. 😄
image de profil
@Hannes_SK the more manageable use. thought process is this: how likely is it that crypto will go to 0? as long as there are people like BTC Oli, I estimate the danger to be very low. They will keep buying the stuff and going all the way, we are already too far to go back. How likely is it that there will be another hype of morons who think it is the next money? Probably enough, mankind is not getting smarter. Only ecologically more conscious, therefore no BTC. what are they oriented to? old highs. how far away are they? over 100%+ So which coin? Cosmos, because I understand that (internet of blockchains, connection between others) and this is more oriented to ETH than to BTC or others. so if the next hype comes in the next 10 years, such a trash depot beats all world buyers by lengths. and in the worst case I lose the stake, I can cope. :)
image de profil
@leveragegrinding That's not what I meant. I meant the two "chemistry" values above. I have no idea about cryptos. My IT knowledge is limited to Tia, S7 and C++ in its basics. 😅😂 But in principle I also made it so that I have a reasonable contribution in cryptos that I can cope with, even in case of total loss.
1
image de profil
@Hannes_SK ah, the thought process for stocks was similar. solid ideas with hype potential and executives who are able to implement something are bought.
image de profil
@leveragegrinding
I say yes, very speculative on the road, my dear. 😄 I now only buy things that I can subjectively assess well and also know the market very well. Previously only ETF and some Bitcoin. Has then yes over the Corona years worked out great and sold everything on time December 21 and now I'm gradually building my dream portfolio. 😄
2
image de profil
@Hannes_SK ey after all know more IT than I have, with me it is limited to Ctrl C and Ctrl V 😅😂
image de profil
@Lehman_Brothers12 That's why we're here in this community. Everyone can do something very well, but other things not at all. In my opinion, it should be primarily about the exchange of knowledge, because we can all gain from it. 😄
1
image de profil
@Hannes_SK I agree with you completely
1
image de profil
Why $ATOM and not $DOT or $QNT when it comes to interoperability of blockchains? I see the Overledger from Quant as superior in the medium term, because with all blockchains unlimited compatibility while Cosmos the blockchain must already be built on the Cosmos SDK. No fun no idea I'm still looking for a suitable investment case and crypto value for me to gamble and I'm focused on $QNT. There I met Cosmos only also 😉 but I would still be interested why Cosmos
image de profil
@Fabzy because higher marketcap Hope I🥴
1
image de profil
image de profil
@TradingMelone tell that to the chart
1
image de profil
@leveragegrinding Wait a minute😄
1
image de profil
@TradingMelone I do, you can see the position in my profile
image de profil
@TradingMelone ok, why? Both solve a similar problem just in different ways for different audiences in my opinion. Quant is aimed more at companies that have already built their blockchains and connects everyone together. I find MultiChainApps super exciting. Cosmos is aimed more at developers who want to build their blockchains with Cosmos. With Quant, I find the bridge to the current world (as it sounds) and Blockchains interesting and see as a solution for all cases, while Cosmos will only ever play in its yes Cosmos. I'm grateful for any other perspective on it, so knock yourself out ;)
image de profil
@Fabzy Cosmos connects blockchains and bridges are as we all know - dirty - also I know many big projects, funds and banks find Cosmos interesting. Developer Activity is high, nice Price Action, everything in Cosmos is very user friendly and easy for the end consumer. BNB is based on Cosmos and also other projects like DYDX or similar are migrating.
1
image de profil
@TradingMelone ok, yes NBB is a flagship. But what would you criticize about QNT that you say ATOM > QNT?
image de profil
@Fabzy I meant above with the market cap: by the less large admittingness of QNT there is also less interest from all sides, which is first a disadvantage. See completely stupid comparison: BTC has ultra many quirks. But because it is the best known in its field, everyone buys it.
image de profil
@Fabzy QNT has similar sectarian traits for me similar to XRP. That is for me nen blatant ab turn. In addition, I limit myself to very few projects and think little of diversify in Crypto. Here rather quality instead of quantity and there hass with me now times Atom reingeschafft. In addition, I hardly researche new projects meanwhile. I invest in my big players and swing trade the rest. Would like to say that QNT can be quite crass have a few good contacts who are also big in there - I just do not feel so 100 percent.
1
Voir toutes les 2 autres réponses
image de profil
Am curious how the portfolio looks in 10 years 😊 Very speculative can also bring a lot of return 😁 So from me you have a thumb 👍🏼 Everyone has his strategy ♟️ Would never let me be influenced by others so always nice to pull through 💪🏼
image de profil
@Andi_GER if I have held the -40% goes also wetier :) is only "play money"
1
image de profil
all fake without real numbers. just a wish or nightmare. Who posts here every day should not have such a bad portfolio. Feedback is not an attack.
Voir toutes les 4 autres réponses
TA has start-up difficulties!
image de profil
There is an all-world missing 😏
Voir toutes les 3 autres réponses
image de profil
Jaja I also make my underperformance for the Learnings 🤡 Also nice that you indicate how big approximately your Jewelery Posi is, so that one can still guess how much there is now in each 🌚 But where is the bike gone?
Voir toutes les 5 autres réponses
image de profil
I believe with every other user the SOS Emojis would hail only in such a way. I know no share of it must I confess, insinuate you however that you know yourself with it and did not buy blindly. For me the whole would be too risky, if I may practice thus also criticism at your strategy, a core would be missing to me with which little can go wrong, and/or missing with value shares.
Afficher la réponse
image de profil
🅱️ro, what is that?! Landfill is more like it
Utilisateur supprimé
1Année
Le commentaire a été supprimé
Afficher la réponse
Participez à la conversation