1Sem.·

3xGTAA – July 2026 Monthly Review

July was another month to hang in there. Here’s the update:


Asset Performance 07/26 (June 30–July 31, according to Wikifolio)

3xUSDEUR: -2.3%

3xQQQ: -16.0%

3xEU50: +4.3%


3xGTAA Portfolio (June 30, according to Getquin)

June 30, 2026: €136,040

July 31, 2026: €124,540


Wikifolio Certificate (June 30, mid-market rate according to Wikifolio)

June 30, 26: €211.60

July 31, 26: €193.70

Month: -8.5%

YTD: +18.7%


Review 07/26


With a loss of -8.5%, 3xGTAA has posted another month of losses. This time, the losses were driven by the Nasdaq 100. In particular, the high volatility there is taking a significant toll on leveraged ETFs, which reset their leverage to 3 every day. The USD and Euro STOXX 50 are trading virtually unchanged after minor fluctuations.


Outlook 08/26


The markets seem to be slowly shifting their focus to U.S. interest rates, as already suggested in the last update. While the price of oil is rising significantly again, interest-rate-sensitive growth stocks are losing ground. WTI is trading above the SMA150 again and, due to its higher momentum, is once more taking the place of USDEUR.


The allocation for 8/26 is therefore:

2xWTI

3xQQQ

3xEU50


Report from the 3xGTAA Workshop


The price movement of WTI clearly illustrates the systematic risk of a rule-based momentum strategy. Right at the turn of the month, the price hits an interim low and then rises again. In the meantime, 2xWTI is up 60%. What conclusions can be drawn from this? The answer is: none. Why?

Across most asset classes and regions, the momentum effect is only measurable over a time horizon of at least one month. Below that, other effects dominate, such as mean reversion or political factors. From a momentum perspective, the fact that the WTI price turns right at the start of the month is therefore unpredictable and thus likely a coincidence. The backtests and model parameters have already factored this coincidence in. Perhaps next month an asset will turn to “sell” just in time before it drops significantly? We don’t know, and we don’t need to. And it’s not worth getting upset about.


Incidentally, this presents a certain psychological challenge: continuing to follow the rules and trusting the model, even when it occasionally generates signals that, in hindsight, do not seem optimal. This challenge is likely also a major reason why momentum strategies have not yet gained widespread acceptance. Trust in momentum is lacking because understanding is lacking. That’s why it’s not enough to cobble together a few parameters for a model that look good in backtesting—understanding the asset basket, the chosen parameters, and momentum in general is essential for long-term success. Otherwise, you’ll change your strategy at the first sign of volatility or abandon it entirely—just before it starts performing again. Therefore:


May the understanding of momentum be with you!

Yours, Epi


EDIT: Due to the sharp decline, WTI is trading well below the signal line as of August 1. So the July allocation remains in effect.


$DE000LS9U6W1 (+0,79 %)

https://www.wikifolio.com/de/de/w/wf03x0gtaa

previw image
53
24 Commentaires

Last month’s volatility was probably toxic for all momentum strategies, especially those using leveraged ETFs. My model also switched from commodities to the NASDAQ and now wants to switch back... but understanding why this happens really helps in assessing the situation and enjoying the roller coaster ride. Thanks for sharing and explaining, @Epi.
6
image de profil
@erbsinator
When it comes to momentum, whipsaws are the main issue—see WTI in the post. Volatility drag is standard for the 3x ETF anyway.
1
image de profil
1Sem.
@Yoshika Exactly, those sawtooth patterns are a nightmare for momentum!
That's why, in my opinion, you shouldn't rely 100% on momentum models. It's too stressful.
2
image de profil
2
image de profil
By the way, did you also test the final version separately using out-of-sample data?
1
image de profil
@Epi @Yoshika
Forward is Wikifolio. I was referring to before that. Was there a separate OOS block before the parameters were finalized? The time period, CAGR, and MaxDD after fees would be interesting to see.
image de profil
1Sem.
@Yoshika The main problem with the backtests was Bitcoin. It wasn’t really possible to test it reliably until 2018. On top of that, leveraged ETFs haven’t been around for very long.

Once the parameters were set, I tried to backtest the model synthetically—excluding BTC—from 2017 back to 2008. The CAGR was then around 35%, and so was the maxDD. For this very same synthetic model, there were comparable results for 2018–2024 as well. From this, I concluded that the real model would have behaved similarly in 2008–2017 as it did in 2018–2024. 🤷
1
image de profil
Attention Attention - Listen what Mama always told you: “STAY TUNED”
1
image de profil
1Sem.
@MozartsGeist Never ignore your Mama!
image de profil
I got a 10% loss warning from comdirect a few days ago. Apparently, they have to do that for this product because of MiFID. But it’s actually a nice reminder to buy more :D
1
image de profil
1Sem.
@CMustermann I'd buy more if the momentum turns upward again...
image de profil
Glad to see you're still alive 👍
1
image de profil
1Sem.
@DonkeyInvestor It's great that you're already alive.
image de profil
@Epi You just want my money
image de profil
1Sem.
@DonkeyInvestor What do you mean by "your" money? 🤷
image de profil
@Epi There are still quite a few things you don't have yet
image de profil
Ah, 18.5% YTD. The YTD target return is now well above the current YTD return again. So I guess I can go all in now. 🚀

Since my limit order was triggered quite early in July, my next purchase will be in August at 174 euros—or, if that price isn’t reached, at the end of August at whatever price.
1
image de profil
1Sem.
@DonkeyInvestor Don't scare me! 🫣
image de profil
Given the situation with Iran, WTI prices can change significantly practically every day.
1
image de profil
@Epi You were invested 3x in USDEUR, not 5x (since it's not that liquid).

And has the signal changed yet regarding WTI, or is the switch still to come?
1
image de profil
1Sem.
@AxoWallStreet Right, 3x in USDEUR—I've corrected it.

The canceled trade in WTI is already mentioned in the EDIT. The buy signal was negated today on the reference date. -8% turned out to be too much after all. 😬
image de profil
What do you think about the current situation with gold? Are you sticking with your "buy and hold" strategy—or are you not holding on?
image de profil
1Sem.
@Simon_n The plan was to significantly reduce the gold/silver allocation from over 40% to below 20% in 2026. There were some sales and price declines. Right now, I'm at 25%. The rest will follow over the course of the year. 👍
1
Participez à la conversation