8Mo·

Jan 14 / Enterprise Software — Same Cycle, Very Different Quality

Salesforce vs. Atlassian vs. ServiceNow


Enterprise software has been out of favor for a while now, but last week in particular was painful. The main concern, once again, is AI. And yet, business quality remains unchanged for many of the heavy hitters. Balance sheets look rock-solid and contracts haven’t suddenly “heard of AI.” Currently, I hold all three of the big names in the SaaS space: Salesforce, Atlassian, and ServiceNow. However, they play very different roles in my portfolio, and my conviction levels are no longer equal.


Let’s start with positioning. Salesforce sits at roughly 3.3% of my portfolio. ServiceNow is slightly smaller at ~2.8%, while Atlassian is the largest of the three at ~4.5%. Yes — from a pure business-quality standpoint, ServiceNow is clearly the best company here.


ServiceNow is not just another SaaS tool. It’s enterprise workflow infrastructure. IT, HR, security, governance — once ServiceNow is embedded, it becomes organizationally impossible to rip out. This is not about switching software; it’s about rewiring how a company functions. In downturns, enterprises cut tools, not their workflow backbone. Add AI to that equation, and ServiceNow becomes even more valuable. Structured workflow data is exactly what enterprise-grade AI needs to function reliably, and products like Now Assist are additive rather than disruptive.


Financially, this quality shows. ServiceNow consistently delivers ~20% revenue growth, ~30% free cash flow growth, FCF margins around 34%, and a Rule of 40 score of ~54. The stock currently trades at an FCF yield of ~3.5%, expanding toward ~5.7% on FY27 estimates. It’s expensive, no doubt — but deservedly so. I genuinely love this company and, long term, I want it to be my largest enterprise software position. My only hesitation right now is timing and valuation, not quality.


Salesforce is a different story. It remains mission-critical at its core, but the CRM empire arguably has to rethink its pricing approach. AI here is more defensive than transformative, but Agentforce is growing at a respectable pace. That said, Salesforce throws off enormous cash. Revenue growth sits closer to ~10%, but the company trades at a 6–6.5% FCF yield today, expanding toward ~9.5% on FY27 estimates, with a Rule of 40 around 43. Salesforce increasingly behaves like a mature software compounder rather than a growth engine. I’m comfortable holding it around current levels, and I’m not trimming it into this software downturn. I’m betting this cycle is temporary.


Then there’s Atlassian. Deeply embedded with developers, culturally loved, and clearly one of the more interesting turnaround candidates in enterprise software right now. Jira and Confluence remain powerful products, and Atlassian is probably at the forefront of a sentiment-driven rebound if software multiples re-rate. Revenue growth is still projected around ~20% annually, with a current FCF yield of ~6%, expanding toward ~9.5% on FY27 estimates, and a Rule of 40 close to 49.


At the same time, this is where my concerns are highest. Seat-based pricing, exposure to hiring freezes, and direct AI substitution risk are real. Task tracking and documentation are exactly where AI copilots excel, and Atlassian’s AI monetization remains weak so far, with Rovo largely bundled. The valuation already reflects part of that risk, which is why I’m not rushing to sell. But this is a medium-term turnaround bet (30–50% upside) not a multidecade compounder at any price.


So the conclusion is clear. I want to concentrate more, not diversify more, over the long term. ServiceNow is my highest-conviction play structurally. Atlassian and Salesforce, however, are more interesting cyclical opportunities right now. The forward selloff across enterprise software looks massively overblown, and fundamentally, these businesses show no signs of real weakness.

attachment

$CRM (+2,71 %)
$NOW (+1,38 %)
$TEAM (-1,88 %)
$MSFT (-1,94 %)

6
Participez à la conversation