image de profil
A performance of 57% in 8 years is not exactly good, so I'm willing to accept higher taxes for a better performance
1
image de profil
@Slucks87 Of course, you must not forget the approx. 4% payouts and approx. 7% dividend increase. On the other hand, it is a good addition to an e.g. $FGEQ
3
image de profil
I have a similar view.
I personally find the performance/dividend ratio appropriate.
Without reigniting the old discussion between value / growth strategies, I think the $TDIV is great, especially in combination with $VHYL.
I think if you combine them in 1/3 to 2/3 (with 2/3 the $VHYL), you get a solid combination of performance and dividend as a value investor.
2